Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:37:19.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND INDIAN INDEPENDENCE, 1945–1947

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2003

NICHOLAS OWEN
NICHOLAS OWEN
Affiliation:
The Queen's College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article examines the reasons for the failure of the Conservative party to offer effective opposition to the independence of India in 1947. It is argued that until the last moment the Conservative stance on Indian independence was much more hostile than is usually recognized. That this opposition did not evolve into a full-scale revolt is explained less by the conversion of Conservatives to acceptance of the Attlee government's Indian policy than by the party leaders' beliefs that it would be hard to sustain a coherent campaign against it. The inability of unreconciled Conservatives to challenge this tactical decision as they had done in the early 1930s resulted from the erosion and disappearance of many of the organizational advantages they had then enjoyed and of the rapid pace of events in India.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 403 - 436
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Ross McKibbin and other participants in the Oxford Nineteenth and Twentieth Century British History seminar for an opportunity to try out these ideas, and to Vernon Bogdanor, John Darwin, Robert Holland, David Omissi, Philip Williamson, and the anonymous referees of this journal for comments on an earlier draft.