Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:46:45.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE COAL QUESTION BEFORE JEVONS

Part of: Malthusian Moments Special Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2019

FREDRIK ALBRITTON JONSSON Open the ORCID record for FREDRIK ALBRITTON JONSSON [Opens in a new window]
FREDRIK ALBRITTON JONSSON*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
*
Department of History, University of Chicago, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the early nineteenth century, political economists, politicians, and geologists debated the size and duration of the British coal supply. For mineral Malthusians, the argument about a dwindling supply sharpened anxieties about population pressure, fuel demand, and limited resources. They introduced a new sense of geological limits and long-term obligations into the theology of atonement. But for cornucopian liberals, the shift to a mineral energy regime supplied a powerful refutation to the Malthusian forecast. Inexhaustible coal promised growth without end.

Type
Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 63 , Special Issue 1: Malthusian Moments , February 2020 , pp. 107 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Alison Bashford, Shailaja Fennel, and Duncan Kelly for the invitation to take part in this special issue and the opportunity to present an early version of the paper at the conference on ‘Malthus: food, land and people’ at Jesus College, Cambridge, in 2016. For their very helpful feedback, I am also indebted to Dipesh Chakrabarty, Emily Osborn, Julia Adeney Thomas, and the other participants in the Neubauer workshop on Planetary History at the University of Chicago. Finally, I want to express my deep gratitude to the peer reviewers at the Historical Journal for their many questions and comments.

References

1 Auerbach, Eric, The Great Exhibition of 1851: a nation on display (New Haven, CT, 1999), pp. 92, 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The official descriptive and illustrated catalogue of the Great Exhibition (3 vols., London, 1851), i, p. 119Google Scholar.

2 The official descriptive and illustrated catalogue, i, pp. 115–16; De la Beche, Henry T. in Lectures on the results of the Great Exhibition (London, 1852), pp. 35–6Google Scholar; Auerbach, The Great Exhibition, p. 90. De la Beche called the exhibits ‘illustrations’ – drawing attention to the new visual language of geology.

3 Daunton in Matthew, Colin, ed., The nineteenth century: British Isles, 1815–1901 (Oxford, 2000), pp. 42–3Google Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, A mad, bad, and dangerous people? England, 1783–1846 (Oxford, 2008), p. 630Google Scholar.

4 Rudwick, M. J. S., ‘Poulett Scrope on the volcanos of Auvergne: Lyellian time and political economy’, British Journal for the History of Science, 7 (1974), pp. 205–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rashid, Salim, ‘Political economy and geology in the early nineteenth century: similarities and contrasts’, History of Political Economy, 13 (1981), pp. 726–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hilton, Boyd, The age of atonement: the influence of evangelicalism on social and economic thought, 1785–1865 (Oxford, 1988), pp. 148–52Google Scholar; White, Michael, ‘In the lobby of the energy hotel: Jevons's formulation of the postclassical “economic problem”’, History of Political Economy, 36 (2004), pp. 227–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Madureira, Nuno Luis, ‘The anxiety of abundance: William Stanley Jevons and coal scarcity in the nineteenth century’, Environment and History, 18 (2012), pp. 395–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wrigley, E. A., Energy and the English Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sieferle, Rolf Peter, The subterranean forest: energy systems and the Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, 2001)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Timothy, Carbon democracy: political power in the age of oil (New York, NY, 2011), p. 234Google Scholar; Cavert, William, The smoke of London: energy and the environment in the early modern city (Cambridge, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Hume quoted in Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, xvii (17 May 1833), p. 1360. Christopher Otter sketches a political and environmental history of coal and wheat in his brilliant essay ‘Liberty and ecology: resources, markets and the British contribution to the global environmental crisis’, in Vernon, James and Gunn, Simon, eds., Peculiarities of liberal modernity in imperial Britain (Manchester, 2011), pp. 182–98Google Scholar.

6 Jonsson, Fredrik Albritton, Enlightenment's frontier: the Scottish Highlands and the origins of environmentalism (New Haven, CT, 2013), pp. 181–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; [Malthus, T. R.], An essay on the principle of population (London, 1798)Google Scholar; Malthus, T. R., Principles of political economy: variorum edition, ed. Pullen, John (2 vols., Cambridge, 1989), i, p. 577Google Scholar; for mineral exhaustion in Malthus, see ‘Malthus diary of a tour of the Lake District’, in Pullen, J. M. and Parry, Trevor Hughes, eds., T. R. Malthus: the unpublished papers in the collection of Kanto Gakuen University (2 vols., Cambridge, 2004), ii, p. 40Google Scholar; James, Patricia, ed., The travel diaries of T. R. Malthus (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 111–12, 115Google Scholar; Ricardo, David, On the principles of political economy and taxation, in Sraffa, Piero, ed., The works and correspondence of David Ricardo (11 vols., Indianapolis, IN, 2004), i, pp. 169, 331–2Google Scholar; Ricardo discussed the value and labour of steam engines with McCulloch in 1820, see Ricardo, The works and correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. Sraffa, viii, pp. 171, 192, 389–90.

7 Chalmers, Thomas, An enquiry into the extent and stability of natural resources (Edinburgh, 1808), pp. 25–6Google Scholar; Brown, Stewart J., Thomas Chalmers and the Godly commonwealth in Scotland (Oxford, 1982), pp. 36–7Google Scholar.

8 Slaney, Robert A., Essay on the beneficial direction of rural expenditure (London, 1824), pp. 9, 19–22Google Scholar, quotation on p. 22; Richards, Paul, ‘R. A. Slaney, the industrial town, and early Victorian social policy’, Social History, 4 (1979), pp. 85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 McCulloch, John Ramsay, Principles of political economy: with a sketch of the rise and progress of that science (Edinburgh, 1825), pp. 119, 124, 136, 150–1Google Scholar; O'Brien, D. P., J. R. McCulloch: a study in classical economics (London, 1970), p. 280Google Scholar; E. A. Wrigley, ‘The supply of raw materials in the Industrial Revolution’, Economic History Review, n.s., 15 (1962), p. 3.

10 Velkar, Aashish, Markets and measurements in nineteenth-century Britain (Cambridge, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Flinn, Michael, The history of the British coal industry, ii: The Industrial Revolution (Oxford, 1984), pp. 283–5; on 7 Mar. 1828Google Scholar, a committee of representatives of the Northumberland Collieries, which included Buddle, decided to lobby both houses of parliament regarding domestic and foreign duties, see North of England Mining and Mechanical Engineers Institute, Buddle Atkinson papers, box 5, fo. 41.

11 Report from the select committee of the House of Lords appointed to take into consideration the state of the coal trade in the United Kingdom (London, 1830), pp. 39–40, 48Google Scholar; Orde, Anne, ed., Letters of John Buddle to Lord Londonderry: 1820–1843 (Woodbridge, 2013), pp. 183–4Google Scholar.

12 Report from the select committee of the House of Lords appointed to take into consideration the state of the coal trade in the United Kingdom, pp. 77–8.

13 Ibid., p. 102.

14 Select committee of the House of Lords appointed to take into consideration the state of the coal trade (Newcastle upon Tyne, 1829); McCulloch in Edinburgh Review, Apr.–July 1830, pp. 190–2; McCulloch, Observations on the duty on sea-borne coal (London, 1831).

15 Report of the select committee on the state of the coal trade (London, 1830), pp. 231, 233, 236, 238Google Scholar.

16 Buckland, Geology and mineralogy considered with reference to natural theology (2 vols., London, 1836), i, p. 554. For Buckland's natural theology, see Rudwick, Martin, Bursting the limits of time: the reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution (Chicago, IL, 2005), pp. 610–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the concern with glut in Liberal Tory ideology, see Hilton, Age of atonement, p. 118. On the synchronicity of Thomas Chalmers's Malthusian political economy and Buckland's geology, see Rupke, Nicholas, The great chain of history: William Buckland and the English School of Geology, 1814–1849 (Oxford, 1983), pp. 256–7Google Scholar. This article leaves to the side the question of how Malthusian thought may have shaped Buckland's understanding of population checks in the economy of nature.

17 Report of the select committee on the state of the coal trade, pp. 241–2, 244. Buckland and Buddle arranged to meet to discuss the ‘probable duration of our coal-field’ on 5 May 1830, the day before Buckland's testimony to the select committee; see Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Buckland papers, box 4, section 3, fo. 60.

18 Report of the select committee on the state of the coal trade, pp. 244–5, 247. While Buckland's Bridgewater treatise would cast geology in an explicitly religious frame, Buckland did not mention providence in his testimony but spoke instead of the position of coal beds as the ‘accidental and successive accumulations of drifted vegetables’; cf. ibid., p. 247.

19 Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, ii (11 Feb. 1831), p. 415; Parliamentary Debates, Third Series (1 July 1831), pp. 595–7; for Hume and the abundance of coal, see Barrow, John Henry, The mirror of parliament for the third session of the eighth parliament, iii (London, 1829), p. 1725Google Scholar; the ‘coal interest’ also included Wharncliffe, Ravensworth, Londonderry, Russell, and Bell, see North of England Mining and Mechanical Engineers Institute, Buddle Atkinson papers, vol. 5, fo. 55; on Hume's ideology, see Huch, Ronald K. and Ziegler, Paul R., Joseph Hume, the people's M.P. (Philadelphia, PA, 1985)Google Scholar; for Warburton's geological interests, see Lews, Cherry and Knell, Simon J., The making of the Geological Society of London (London, 2008)Google Scholar. For Conybeare's section, see Report of the select committee on the state of the coal trade, p. 394.

20 Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, xxiv (2 July 1834), pp. 1084, 1087; Taylor, Richard Cowling, Statistics of coal (Philadelphia, PA, 1848), p. 266Google Scholar; Thomas, David Alfred, The growth and direction of our foreign trade in coal during the last half century (London, 1903), p. 7Google Scholar.

21 Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, xxv (25 July 1834), pp. 533–4; reprinted in The speeches of the Late Right Honourable Sir Robert Peel … (4 vols., London, 1853), ii, pp. 862–3; for Buckland and Peel, see Hilton, Age of atonement, pp. 23, 78 n. 23, 150–1; idem, A mad, bad, and dangerous people?, p. 340. Buckland advised Peel on economic questions and matters of science regularly, see for example British Library (BL), Add. MS 40403, fo. 83; BL, Add. MS 40429, fos. 4, 49; BL, Add. MS 40504, fo. 387; BL, Add. MS 40560, fo. 40. See also the Peel–Buckland correspondence in the Beinecke Library, Osborn d61. For conservative protectionism more generally, see Gambles, Anna, Protection and politics: Conservative economic discourse, 1815–1852 (Woodbridge, 1999)Google Scholar.

22 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the revolution in France (London, 1790), pp. 47, 69, 144Google Scholar; Wrigley, E. A., Continuity, change and chance in the English Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. One of Peel's early speeches in parliament, regarding the function of the speaker of the House of Commons, defined the office as a bond between the past and the future, whose performance affected ‘even the remotest posterity’, see The speeches of the Late Right Honourable Sir Robert Peel, i, p. 107.

23 Parliamentary Papers, Third Series, xxv (1 Aug. 1834), pp. 907–8; Barrow, The mirror of parliament for the second session of the eleventh parliament, iv (London, 1834), p. 3185. Warburton allied with Lyell rather than Buckland in the Geological Society of London disputes, see Lyell, Mrs, Life, letters, and journals of Sir Charles Lyell, Bart (2 vols., London, 1881), i, p. 38Google Scholar.

24 Barrow, Mirror of parliament, iv, p. 3185; Church, Roy, The history of the British coal industry, iii: 1830–1913: Victorian pre-eminence (Oxford, 1986), p. 65Google Scholar.

25 McCulloch, Observations on the duty on sea-borne coal, pp. 4–5; idem, The statistical account of the British empire (2 vols., London, 1837), i, p. 89; cf. Mackenzie, Aeneas, Historical, topographical and descriptive view of County Palatine Durham (Newcastle upon Tyne, 1834), p. cxiiiGoogle Scholar. In later life, McCulloch changed his mind and embraced export duties; see O'Brien, J. R. McCulloch: a study in classical economics, p. 126.

26 Scrope, George Poulett, Principles of political economy deduced from the natural laws of social welfare and applied to the present state of Britain (London, 1833), pp. 265, 272–3Google Scholar; M. J. S. Rudwick, ‘Poulett Scrope on the volcanos of Auvergne’, pp. 205–42; Rashid, ‘Political economy and geology in the early nineteenth century’, pp. 726–44; Hilton, Age of atonement, pp. 153–4; Stack, David, ‘The “secret concatenation” in the mid-nineteenth century: the case of George Poulett Scrope, a still neglected political economist’, History of Political Economy, 32 (2000), pp. 553–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Quarterly Review, 56 (1836), Scrope, ‘Geology considered with reference to natural theology’, pp. 36, 39, 64; Scrope, George Poulett, A plea for the rights of industry in Ireland … (London, 1848), pp. 39–40Google Scholar.

28 Buckland, Geology and mineralogy considered, i, pp. vii, 1–4, 66–7, 536–8; Buckland collected a great deal of material on coal in preparation; see Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Buckland papers, ‘Notes for the Bridgewater Treatise’, box 2 and box 4; Topham, Jonathan, ‘Science and popular education in the 1830s: the role of the “Bridgewater Treatises”’, British Journal for the History of Science, 25 (1992), pp. 397–430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; on the theology of nature, see Topham, Jonathan, ‘Science, natural theology, and the practice of Christian piety in early nineteenth-century religious magazines’, in Cantor, Geoffrey and Shuttleworth, Sally, eds., Science serialized: representations of the sciences in nineteenth-century periodicals (Cambridge, MA, 2004), pp. 37–66Google Scholar.

29 Diary of Thomas Sopwith 1828–79, Newcastle University Library, Special Collections, microfilm, journal 26, p. 256; journal 27, pp. 293–4, journal 30, 1842, pp. 43–5; Turner, S. and Dearman, W. R., ‘Thomas Sopwith's large geological models’, Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 44 (1982), pp. 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, lxiii (14 June 1842), pp. 1576–7; Greg, J. R., Observations on the proposed duties on the exportation of coals (London, 1842), p. 17Google Scholar; Milner, Thomas, The gallery of nature (London, 1846), p. 691Google Scholar; cf. Fyfe, Aileen, Science and salvation: evangelical popular science publishing in Victorian Britain (Chicago, IL, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Daily News, 31 Oct. 1849; Richie, J. Ewing, About London (London, 1860), p. 35Google Scholar.

30 Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, clvii (9 Mar. 1860), pp. 247–330 (debate about coal exports in Cobden–Chevalier treaty); Hull, Edward, The coal fields of Great Britain: their history, structure and resources (London, 1861)Google Scholar; Report of the thirty-third meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at Newcastle-upon-Tyne in August and September 1863 (London, 1864), pp. lii–lvGoogle Scholar; Jevons, William Stanley, The coal question: an inquiry concerning the progress of the nation and the probable exhaustion of our coal mines (London, 1865), pp. 213, 215Google Scholar; Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, clxxxiv (12 June 1866), p. 241 (Vivian's motion for a Royal Commission); Report of the commissioners appointed to inquire into the several matters relating to coal in the United Kingdom (2 vols., London, 1871); Daunton, Martin, Trusting Leviathan: the politics of taxation in Britain, 1799–1914 (Cambridge, 2001), p. 120Google Scholar; Madureira, ‘The anxiety of abundance’.

31 Xenos, Nicholas, Scarcity and modernity (London, 1989), p. 35Google Scholar.