Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:24:36.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE CAREER OF SIR JOHN HYNDE COTTON (1686–1752)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2003

GABRIEL GLICKMAN
Affiliation:
Pembroke College, Cambridge

Abstract

This article examines the character of John Hynde Cotton, a leading tory opponent of Sir Robert Walpole, who played a particularly puzzling role in the conspiracies behind the Jacobite rebellion of 1745, and the parliaments of George II. Entering a coalition ministry in 1744, he was immersed at the same time in intrigue with the exiled Stuart court, and at one stage pledged to use resignation from government as the signal for rebellion. The article explores the background to his career, tracing the intellectual, professional and kinship networks into which he was pressed, and their impact on his political commitments. Cotton's views on government and society were the product of a man caught up in a conflict between image and reality, torn between a set of different identities: robust doyen of rural squiredom, political and commercial ‘insider’, scholar, and ideologue shaped profoundly by the politico-religious crises of the previous century. The article aims to stimulate a new analysis of the facts of a tory-Jacobite career, and so enhance a debate that is in danger of appearing stale. It aspires to reach a deeper understanding of the meaning and principles of eighteenth-century toryism, beyond the mere counting of ‘Jacobite’ or ‘Hanoverian’ heads.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article grew out of a B.A. dissertation written in 2001. For his supervision of this, and his comments on subsequent drafts, I am indebted to Dr Mark Goldie. I would also like to thank Professor Howard Erskine-Hill for his help with an earlier draft, and his assistance with the study of Jacobitism more generally, and Dr Eveline Cruickshanks for initially suggesting that I return to Sir John Hynde Cotton. I am grateful to the anonymous readers of the Historical Journal, for their comments on my original submission, and acknowledge permission to quote from the manuscripts of Her majesty the Queen.