Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
A problem of crucial importance confronted the British labour movement in the 1920s. The working class - those who earned their livelihood by selling their labour power, as well as their dependents - constituted a majority of the population. To the left it seemed manifest that their interests lay in ending a social system which exploited them and putting socialism in its place. Yet during the decade only a minority of British voters committed themselves to socialism, even at the minimal level of voting for the Labour party. As Philip Snowden lamented, ‘the very people for whom [the socialist] works and sacrifices are often indifferent and seldom show any gratitude’. Why did the British working class lack class consciousness?
1 The faith of a democrat (London, 1928), p. 3Google Scholar.
2 MacDonald, Ramsay, A policy for the Labour party (London, 1920), p. 181Google Scholar.
3 Snowden, , Twenty objections to socialism (London, 1920), p. 16Google Scholar.
4 MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution (Manchester, 1919), p. 103Google Scholar; A policy for the Labour party, p. 183Google Scholar.
5 Burns, Emue, Capitalism, Communism and the transition (London, 1933), p. 81Google Scholar.
6 Griffiths, Dan, The real enemy and other socialist essays (London, 1923), pp. 19, 21Google Scholar.
7 Paul, William, Communism and society (London, 1992), p. 79Google Scholar.
8 Pankhurst, Sylvia, ‘A reply to Philip Snowden’, Workers' Dreadnought, 6 Mar. 1920Google Scholar.
9 Millar, J. P. M., ‘Ten minutes talks with new students’, Plebs, xii (1920), p. 195Google Scholar.
10 Bukharin, and Preobrazhensky, , The ABC of Communism (London, 1922), p. 44Google Scholar.
11 Angell, Norman, ‘Capturing the workers' will’, New Leader, 9 Nov. 1923Google Scholar.
12 Bell, Thomas, Editorial, Communist Review, Iv (1924), 507Google Scholar; Dutt, , Marxism after fifty yean (London, 1933), p. 9Google Scholar.
13 Paul, William, The State: Its origin and functions (Glasgow, 1917), p. 187Google Scholar.
14 Hayward, C. H. and Langdon-Davies, B. N., Democracy and the press (Manchester, 1919), p. 4Google Scholar.
15 Editorial, Daily Herald, 31 Oct. 1924Google Scholar; Ibid. 27, 28, 31 Oct. 1924.
16 ‘Notes of the Month’, Labour Monthly, vi (1924), p. 714Google Scholar.
17 Advertisement for the Herald in Labour Magazine, v (Aug. 1926); MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution, p. 27Google Scholar.
18 MacDonald, , Daily Herald, 25 Oct. 1924Google Scholar.
19 Paul, William, ‘Race riots and revolution’, Socialist, 10 July 1919Google Scholar.
20 ‘Broadcasting babble machine’, Labour Monthly, XIII (1931), 191Google Scholar.
21 Workers' Weekly, 26 Dec. 1924Google Scholar.
22 See especially Martin's, The British public and the General Strike (London, 1931)Google Scholar.
23 Paul, William, ‘Capitalism, labour and the press’, Labour Monthly, VII (1925), 565Google Scholar.
24 Pallister, Minnie, ‘Labour women confer’, New Leader, 5 June 1925Google Scholar.
25 ‘Workers' Sport’, Communist, III (1928), 461Google Scholar
26 ‘The press’, in Lees-Smith, H. B., Encyclopaedia of the Labour movement (London, 1928) III, 60Google Scholar.
27 Parliament and revolution, p. 65Google Scholar; and reported at the 1921 Conference of the I.L.P. in Labour Leader, 31 Mar. 1921.
28 Laski, Harold, Socialism and freedom (London, 1925), p. 5Google Scholar.
29 Socialism: Critical and constructive (London, 1921), p. 234Google Scholar.
30 Snowden, , Labour and the new world (London, 1921), p. 51Google Scholar.
31 Hayward, and Langdon-Davies, , Democracy and the press, pp. 59–60Google Scholar.
32 The tradition is discussed with respect to MacDonald by Barker, Bernard in his introduction to Ramsay MacDonald'spolitical writings (London, 1972)Google Scholar, and by Barker, Rodney, Education and politics 1900–1951. A study of the Labour party (Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar, ch. I.
33 ‘Socialism and human nature’, Socialist Review, xxrv (1924), p. 182Google Scholar.
34 MacDonald, , Socialism: Critical and constructive, p. 283Google Scholar.
35 Lansbury's, George address from the chair, Labour Party Conference Report 1928, p. 150Google Scholar.
36 MacDonald, , Socialism: Critical and constructive, p. 2Google Scholar; Parliament and revolution, p. 8Google Scholar.
37 MacDonald's, address from the chair, Labour Party Conference Report 1924, p. 110Google Scholar.
38 A policy for the Labour party, p. 67Google Scholar.
39 ‘The Socialist Way’, Forward, 10 Sept. 1917.
40 ‘The Review outlook’, Socialist Review, xvi (1919), 208Google Scholar.
41 MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution, p. 6Google Scholar.
42 Allen, Clifford, ‘A victory that leads to victory’, New Leader, 7 Nov. 1924Google Scholar; Neft, R. in Griffiths, Dan (ed.), What is socialism? A symposium (London, 1924), p. 57Google Scholar.
43 Ponsonby, Arthur, ‘Democracy and the mob’, Socialist Review XXII (1923), 60Google Scholar.
44 Forward, 21 Dec. 1918Google Scholar.
45 MacDonald, , ‘The Review outlook’, Socialist Review, XVII (1920), 9Google Scholar.
46 My three revolutions (London, 1969), p. 247Google Scholar.
47 Forward, 8 Nov. 1924; Egan, Michael, ‘Arace for safety’, Socialist Review, XXIV (1924), 171Google Scholar.
48 Allen, Clifford, Socialism and the next Labour government (London, 1924), p. 6Google Scholar.
49 Scurr, John, ‘The dictatorship of the proletariat’, Labour Leader, 29 Jan. 1920Google Scholar; Griffiths, Dan, The real enemy, pp. 12–13Google Scholar.
50 Bevin, Ernest, ‘Straight on through the wilderness’, Labour Magazine, x (1931), 347Google Scholar; Lansbury, George, preface to Gerald Gould, The coming revolution in Great Britain (London, 1920), p. ixGoogle Scholar.
51 Welsh, J. C., The king and the miner. A contrast (London, 1925), p. 6Google Scholar.
52 Dodd, James J., If Labour wins (London, 1922), p. 77Google Scholar.
53 MacDonald, , Parliament and revolution, p. 103Google Scholar.
54 Allen, Clifford, Putting socialism into practice (London, 1924), pp. 16–17Google Scholar.
55 Wallas, Graham, Human nature in politics (London, 1908), p. 45Google Scholar.
56 Eden, and Paul, Cedar, Labour Leader, 17 Jan. 1918Google Scholar.
57 This term was derived from Tressel's, Robert book, The ragged trousered philanthropists (London, 1914)Google Scholar, and also became common currency.
58 Shaw, , ‘Are we Bolshevists?’, Labour Leader, 24 Apr. 1919Google Scholar; Tawney, , ‘Christianity and the social revolution’, The Attack and other papers (London, 1935), p. 163Google Scholar; Tillett, , Daily Herald, 31 Oct. 1924Google Scholar.
59 The Attack, p. 163Google Scholar. Ross Terrill explores Tawney's use of Dubb, Henry in R. H. Taximey and his times. Socialism as fellowship (London, 1973), pp. 178, 195–6Google Scholar.
60 Gascoyne, James in, ‘The coming crash’, Communist, 12 Aug. 1930Google Scholar.
61 Eden, and Paul, Cedar, ‘Socialist education’, Workers' Dreadnought, 10 Aug. 1918Google Scholar.
62 Motler, L. A., ‘Dubb dialogues’, Workers' Dreadnought, 16, 23 Aug. 1919Google Scholar.
63 Jackson, T. A., review of Ragged trousered philanthropist, Sunday Worker, 18 Sept. 1927Google Scholar.
64 Socialist, 24 Dec. 1919Google Scholar.
65 (London, 1892), pp. xvii–xviii.
66 (London, 1926), ch. VIII; ‘Imperialism and t he split in t he Labour movement’ (1916), Lenin on Britain (London, 1934), p. 142Google Scholar. Collected works, vols. XXII, XXIII, no. See Hobsbawm's, E. J. discussion of the theory in Revolutionaries. Contemporary essays (London, 1973), PP. 121–9Google Scholar.
67 Rothstein, Theodore, From Chartism to Labourism. Historical sketches of the English working class movement (London, 1973), p. 266Google Scholar.
68 Shields, J., ‘The struggle of the Indian masses’, Communist Review, new ser., iv (1932).76Google Scholar.
69 Dutt, J.R. Palme, Modern India (London, 1927), p. 172Google Scholar; Fox, Ralph, ‘A Communist replies to Philips Price’, Socialist Review, new ser., VIII (Sept. 1926), 41Google Scholar.
70 Esp. pp. 255–66.
71 ‘Self-study syllabus’, Communist, II (1927), 284Google Scholar.
72 Leckie, Jack, ‘Draft programme of the C.P.G.B. to the Comintern criticised’, Communist Review, v (1924), 185Google Scholar.
73 Incorrigible rebel (London, 1960), p110Google Scholar.
74 ‘The concept of the Labour aristocracy’, Popular politics and society in late Victorian Britain (London, 1968), p. 61Google Scholar. For a contrary view see Hobsbawm, E. J., ‘The Labouraristocracy in late Victorian Britain’, Labouring men: Studies in the history of Labour (London, 1964), pp. 272–315Google Scholar.
75 The I.L.P. and the Third International (London, 1920), p. 17Google Scholar.
75 Price, M. Philips, ‘Impressions of the General Election’, Communist International, XXIV (1923), 37Google Scholar; see also Burns, Emile, Communism and the transition (London, 1933), p. 91Google Scholar.
77 Barton, Alfred, A world history for the zuorkers (London, 1922), p. 95Google Scholar.
78 Brailsford, , Socialism for to-day (London, 1925), p. 51Google Scholar.
79 ‘The principle of empire’, Olives of endless age (New York, 1928), p. 283Google Scholar.
80 Labour Party Conference Report 1921, p. 208Google Scholar.
81 Haden-Guest, L., The Labour party and the empire (London, 1926), p. 7Google Scholar. For discussion of this group see Gupta, Partha Sarathi, Imperialism and the British Labour movement 1914–1964 (London, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
82 Quelch, Tom, ‘The opposition to the social revolution in Britain’, Communist International, III, 16–17 (1922) 99–100Google Scholar.
83 Dutt, R. Palme, ‘Notes of the month’, Labour Monthly, VI (1924), 528–3Google Scholar.
84 Dowbrett, , ‘Immediate demands’, Communist Review, v (1924), 255Google Scholar.
85 ‘Marxism’, Socialist, 6 Jan. 1921Google Scholar.
86 ‘The I.L.P.: a Marxist study’, Socialist Review, XVII (1920), 86Google Scholar.
87 Editorial, Communist Review, v (1924), 313Google Scholar.
88 ‘A Query and an answer’, Communist Review, VII (1926), 339Google Scholar.
89 Bernard, A., ‘Marxist-Leninist education’, Communist Review, VII (1926), 378Google Scholar.
90 Labour Monthly, VIII (1926), 323–36Google Scholar.
91 Twenty objections to socialism, p. 16Google Scholar.
92 The aims of Labour (London, 1918), pp. 9–10Google Scholar.
93 When Labour rules (London, 1920), p. 8Google Scholar.
94 Labour Party Conference Report 1923, pp. 178–9Google Scholar.