No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 August 2021
I want to thank the reviewers for engaging so thoughtfully with my book and for raising such a variety of important points. I cannot hope to address more than a selection of them here.
1 Bétant, E. A., ed., Correspondance du Comte Capodistrias, président de la Grèce (4 vols., Geneva and Paris, 1839), I, pp. 297–8Google Scholar.
2 Against the older notions of ‘the modernization thesis’, scholars now argue that the combination of enlightenment and anti-revolution was the rule, not the exception, an idea already put forward by Franco Venturi in his monumental Settecento riformatore (5 vols., Turin, 1969–90). See also Robertson, John, ‘Franco Venturi's enlightenment’, Past & Present, 137 (1992), pp. 183–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Dijn, Annelien de, ‘The politics of enlightenment: from Peter Gay to Jonathan Israel’, Historical Journal, 55 (2012), pp. 785–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Robertson, John, Enlightenment: a very short introduction (Oxford, 2015), p. 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Conrad, Sebastian, ‘Enlightenment in global history: a historiographical critique’, American Historical Review, 117 (2012), pp. 999–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Reill herself offers a masterful perspective of this kind in her new book: The Fiume crisis: life in the wake of the Habsburg empire (Cambridge, MA, 2020).
7 Elisavet Papalexopoulou is completing her Ph.D. thesis on a subject along these lines: ‘Women of letters in the Greek cultural space, 1800–1832’ (European University Institute, Florence).