Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:48:49.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archbishop Abbot and the problem of ‘puritanism’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Susan Holland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is a study of Archbishop Abbot's attitude to puritan nonconformity. It contends that the accusations of laxness levelled against him by Laudian apologists such as Heylin and Clarendon can be discounted as the inevitable consequence of the very different standpoint from which they judged him. It was not laziness that led the primate to turn a blind eye to certain types of nonconformity, but rather a detached attitude – not shared by his anti-Calvinist opponents – which allowed him to differentiate between mild cases of conscience-induced ceremonial nonconformity which posed no danger to the status quo, and the factious high-profile stance of those who undermined the authority of the established church. By taking a very hard line against separatists and their ilk, Abbot felt he could justify the degree of tolerance he granted to those peaceable and orthodox preaching pastors with scruples over certain adiaphora, whose role was so crucial in the unremitting battle against popery to which he dedicated his life.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 23 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hyde, E., The history of the rebellion and Civil Wars in England, (7 vols., Oxford, 1849), I, 125–6Google Scholar. cf. also Sanderson, W., A complete history of the lives and reigns of Mary Queen of Scotland, and her son… James VI, King of Scotland; and… King of Great Britain …the First (London, 1656), pp. 550, 531Google Scholar. Heylin, P., Cyprianus anglicus (London, 1671), Part 1, 59, 161, 229–30.Google Scholar

2 Holland, S. M., Archbishop George Abbot: a study in ecclesiastical statesmanship (unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, 1991).Google Scholar

3 Fincham, K., Prelate as pastor (Oxford, 1990), pp. 248–76Google Scholar. The circle included John King, Arthur Lake and Thomas Morton.

4 Holland, S. M., ‘George Abbot: “the wanted archbishop”’, Church History, LVI (1987).Google Scholar

5 Lake, P., Anglicans and puritans? Presbyterianism and English Conformist thought from Whitgift to Hooker (London, 1988), pp. 242–3.Google Scholar

6 Fincham, K. and Lake, P., ‘The ecclesiastical policy of King James I’, Journal of British Studies, XXIV (1985), 171–181.Google Scholar

7 Heylin, , Cyprianus anglicus, Part 1, 59Google Scholar. Fincham, , Prelate as pastor, pp. 212–31, 303.Google Scholar

8 Lake, , Anglicans and puritans, pp. 244–5.Google Scholar

9 For Abbot's anti-popery cf. Holland, , Archbishop Abbot, pp. 114–71Google Scholar. In July 1610 Bancroft warned King James not to trust the earls of Northampton, Suffolk and Worcester since they were ‘reputed to be among the Catholics’ and were ‘never seen to assist at the service of the communion supper’: Spain and the Jacobean Catholics, ed. Loomie, A. J., Catholic Record Society, LXIV (1973), 157Google Scholar. For Bancroft's suspicions of John Howson (later bishop of Oxford), John Buckeridge (later bishop of Rochester) and Benjamin Carier (who converted to Rome in 1613) cf. Public Record Office (P.R.O.), S.P.14/80/113 (p. 122). Cobbett, W., Complete collection of state trials, ed. Howell, T. B. (33 vols., London, 1809–28), II, 817Google Scholar. British Library (B.L.) Burney MS 363 fo. 25.

10 Abbot, G., An exposition upon the prophet Jonah, ed. Webster, G. (2 vols., London, 1845) I, 40.Google Scholar

11 Lambeth Palace Library (L.P.L.), Abbot's Register, I–III, passim. Russell, C., Parliaments and English politics, 1621–9 (Oxford, 1979), p. 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Abbot's defence of the 1604 Canons cf. P.R.O., S.P. 14/56/9; Proceedings in parliament 1610, ed. Foster, E. R. (2 vols., New Haven and London, 1966), II, 234, 102.Google Scholar

12 Fincham, , Prelate as pastor, pp. 223, 228.Google Scholar

13 Fincham, , Prelate as pastor, pp. 229, 238Google Scholar. Abbot, G., Articles to be enquired of in…the diocese of Lincoln (London, 1613), sig., A2VGoogle Scholar. G. Abbot, Articles to be enquired of in…1616, printed in Cardwell, E., Documentary annals of the Reformed Church of England (2 vols., Oxford, 1844), II, 170Google Scholar. Prynne, W., Canterbury's doom (London, 1646), p. 97.Google Scholar

14 Fincham, and Lake, , ‘The ecclesiastical policy of James I’, Journal of British Studies, XXIV, (1985), 179.Google Scholar

15 Fincham, , Prelate as pastor, p. 230.Google Scholar

16 Ibid. pp. 231–47.

17 P.R.O., S.P.14/67/58, 14/77/90.

18 British Library (B.L.), Additional MS 6178 fo. 208.

19 Dr Williams Library (Dr W. Lib.), Morice MS J (Lives of Eminent Persons), III, 1625–95. Life of Arthur Hildersham, sub 1631, 8–12. P.R.O., S.P.14/67/58. Historical Manuscripts Commission (H.M.C.) 78. Report on the MSS of R. R. Hastings, II, 55.

20 Dr W. Lib., Morice MS J III, Life of Hildersham, 12–14.

21 H.M.C. 78, II, 55.

22 Dr W. Lib., Morice MS J, III, Life of Hildersham, 12–18.

23 Dr W. Lib., Morice MS J, III, Life of John Dod, sub 1645, 4. P.R.O., S.P. 14/67/58, 14/77/90.

24 Dr W. Lib., Morice MS J, III, Life of Dod, 4. Clarke, S., A general martyrology…whereunto is added the lives of thirty-two English divines (London, 1677), pp. 170–1Google Scholar. Collinson, P., The religion of protestants (Oxford, 1982), p. 279 n. 56.Google Scholar

25 Oxford, Bodleian Library, Tanner MS 74 fo. 221. Fincham, and Lake, , ‘The ecclesiastical policy of James I’, Journal of British Studies, XXIV (1985), 198–201.Google Scholar

26 P.R.O., S.P. 14/130/106, I. B.L., Harleian MS 354 fo. 65, 66. Fincham, K. C., Pastoral roles of the Jacobean episcopate in Canterbury Province (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London, 1985), p. 299.Google Scholar

27 L.P.L. MS 943 fo. 103. Seaver, P., The puritan lectureships. The politics of religious dissent, 1560–1662 (Stanford, 1970), p. 243.Google Scholar

28 Heylin, , Cyprianus anglicus, Part I, 190.Google Scholar

29 Prynne, , Canterbury's doom, pp. 376–7Google Scholar. Calendar of state papers domestic (1629–31), Charles I, IV, 53.

30 L.P.L., Abbot's Register, I, 394r. Udney, A., A golden bell and a pomegranate (London, 1625)Google Scholar, Titlepage. P.R.O., S.P.16/164/14.

31 P.R.O., S.P.16/164/14.

32 Prynne, , Canterbury's doom, p. 377Google Scholar. P.R.O., S.P.16/164/14.

33 Clarke, , A general martyrology, pp. 185–6.Google Scholar

34 Neal, D., The history of the puritans (5 vols., London, 1822), II, 180Google Scholar. Clarke, , A general martyrology, p. 187.Google Scholar

35 Clarke, , A general martyrology, p. 187Google Scholar. Dictionary of national biography (D.N.B.) sub Herbert Palmer.

36 Clarke, , A general martryrology, p. 186Google Scholar. D.N.B. sub Herbert Palmer.

37 P.R.O., S.P.16/13/15. Letters of John Davenport, ed. Calder, I. M. (London, 1937), pp. 26–7, 29–30Google Scholar. Davenport was cited before High Commission in 1628 apparently for arranging a private collection on behalf of the distressed clergy of the Palatinate the previous year. Although he told Lady Vere that he expected ‘a fierce storm from the enraged spirits of the two bishops’ it seems unlikely that Abbot would have wished to be too severe on him for such an ‘offence’, while the primate himself was probably under considerable pressure from Laud in High Commission at this date, particularly since he had only just returned from his sequestration in Kent. Moreover it is noticeable that despite Davenport's fears he did not actually lose his benefice. Seaver, , The puritan lectureships, p. 227.Google Scholar

38 P.R.O., S.P. 14/173/58.

39 Davenport, , Letters, p. 3Google Scholar. Activities of the puritan faction of the Church of England, 1625–1633, ed. Calder, I. M. (London, 1957), Introduction, xi.Google Scholar

40 Davenport, , Letters, p. 39.Google Scholar

41 B.L., Additional MS 39, 288 fo. 10. Davenport, , Letters, p. 5.Google Scholar

42 Prynne, W., The perpetuity of a regenerate man's estate (London, 1626)Google Scholar, The Epistle Dedicatory, sig. ¶ [4] r, ¶ 2r–v, ¶ 3r.

43 Prynne, , Canterbury's doom, p. 72.Google Scholar

44 Page, W., A treatise of justification of bowing at the name of Jesus (Oxford, 1631). L.P.L., MS 943 fo. 97.Google Scholar

45 Page, , A treatise of justification, pp. 98, 107–8, 112, 123.Google Scholar

46 Prynne, , Canterbury's doom, p. 207.Google Scholar

47 The works of William Laud, ed. Bliss, J., Scott, W. (7 vols., Oxford, 1847–60) v.i.39Google Scholar. According to Anthony, Wood, Athenae oxonienses, ed. Bliss, P. (4 vols., London, 1813–20), II, 563Google Scholar, Abbot actually published his own opinion on the subject of bowing in October 1632 in a pamphlet entitled Judgement of bowing at the name of Jesus, but this is almost certainly a mistake since an anonymous treatise [by H.B. of Cambridge and I.H. of Oxford] of this name was dedicated to Abbot in 1632. The work was published in Hamburg, cf. Christophers, R. A., George Abbot. A bibliography, (University of Virginia, 1966), pp. 85–6.Google Scholar

48 Prynne, , Canterbury's doom, pp. 171–5Google Scholar. Heylin, , Cyprianus anglicus, Part 1, 217.Google Scholar

49 Prynne, W., Histriomastix (London, 1633), pp. 276–87, 236Google Scholar. P.R.O., S.P. 16/242/50.

50 Foster, S., Notes from the Caroline underground (Connecticut, 1978), pp. 40–57Google Scholar. Prynne, W., The antipathy of the English lordly prelacy (London, 1641), p. 152.Google Scholar

51 P.R.O., S.P.14/122/97.

52 Fuller, T., The church history of Britain, ed. Brewer, J. S. (6 vols., Oxford, 1845), V, 419–24.Google Scholar

53 The Egerton papers, ed. Collier, J. P. (Camden Society, XII, 1840), pp. 447–8Google Scholar. Fox, A. W., Four English Unitarian martyrs (London, 1913), pp. 7–8, 11–12.Google Scholar

54 Cambridge University Library, Mm.VI.58 fos. 189r–v, 190, 199.

55 Sprunger, K. L., The learned Doctor William Ames (London, 1972), pp. 11, 17, 22–5Google Scholar. Ames, W., A fresh suit against human ceremonies (1633), Part II, 409.Google Scholar

56 Sprunger, , William Ames, pp. 27, 30, 32.Google Scholar

57 Memorials of affairs of state…collected…from the original papers of…Sir Ralph Winwood, ed. Sawyer, E. (3 vols., London, 1725), III, 346–7.Google Scholar

58 Ibid. 347.

59 Foster, S., Notes from the Caroline underground (Connecticut, 1978), pp. 15–16Google Scholar. Sprunger, , William Ames, pp. 62–3, 65–6.Google Scholar

60 Foster, , Caroline underground, pp. 16–18Google Scholar. Leighton, A., An epitome (London, 1646), pp. 7, 9, 67–8Google Scholar. Leighton, A., Speculum belli sacri ([Netherlands] 1624)Google Scholar: see, for example, pp. 120–1, 195–6, 312–13. McElroy, K., Laud and his struggle for influence from 1628 to 1640 (unpublished D.Phil. dissertation, University of Oxford, 1943), p. 73.Google Scholar

61 Abbot, , Jonah, I, 265–6, II, 49.Google Scholar

62 Sprunger, , William Ames, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar

63 P.R.O., S.P.84/89/19, 20.

64 Sprunger, , William Ames, pp. 65–70, 90–94.Google Scholar

65 Fincham, , Prelate as pastor, pp. 224–5, 317–18Google Scholar. Holland, , Archbishop Abbot, pp. 96, 98–101.Google Scholar

66 Laud, , Works, III, 420–1Google Scholar. cf. also Hacket, J., Scrinia reserata (London, 1693), Part I, 97.Google Scholar

67 Rushworth, J., Historical collections (8 vols., London, 1721–2), I, 451–2.Google Scholar

68 Reports of cases in the Courts of Star Chamber and High Commission, ed. Gardiner, S. R. (Camden Society, New Series, XXXIX, 1886), pp. 181–322Google Scholar. Abbot may not have been present at the court held on 26 April 1632 – there is no list of those who attended, pp. 275–8.

69 Reports of cases, ed. Gardiner, , pp. 181–6, 189Google Scholar; 316–21.

70 Ibid. pp. 198–238.

71 Ibid. pp. 278–80.

72 Ibid. pp. 244, 269; 241–3.

73 Ibid. pp. 246–59.

74 L.P.L., MS 943 fo. 105. B.L., Additional MS 39, 288 fo. 10.

75 L.P.L., MS 943 fo. 105.

76 Heylin, , Cyprianus anglicus, Part 1, 161–3.Google Scholar