Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:45:07.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Scottish aristocracy, anglicization and the Court, 1603–38

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Keith M. Brown
Keith M. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to analyse the extent to which the Scottish aristocracy was anglicized in the years between the union of the crowns and the national covenant. The question is one which has a bearing upon the origins of the Scottish revolution in 1637–8, and on the wider issues of elite integration in multi-state monarchies in the early modem period. Topics discussed are aristocratic education, exposure to a new court culture, office holding in England, the effects on income and expenditure of English patronage and lifestyles, changes in the honours system, and new patterns in births, marriages and deaths. The conclusions are firstly that the Scottish presence at court was such that it does not make sense to talk of an English court after 1603. Secondly, there was very little anglidzation of the Scottish aristocracy outside a handful of court families, and even these retained a strong sense of national consciousness.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 543 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Merriman, M., ‘The assured Scots; Scottish collaborators with England during the Rough Wooing’, Scottish History Review, XLVII (1968), 10–34Google Scholar; Donaldson, G., ‘Foundations of Anglo-Scottish union’, in Bindoff, S. T. and others eds., Elizabethan government and society: essays presented to Sir John Heale (London, 1961), pp. 148–51Google Scholar; R. A. Mason, ‘Scotching the Brut: politics, history and national myth in sixteenth century Britain’, M. Merriman, ‘James Henrisoun and “Great Britain”; British union and the Scottish commonweal’, and Brown, K. M., ‘The price of friendship: the “well affected” and economic clientage in Scotland before 1603’, all in Mason, R. A. ed., Scotland and England 1286–1815 (Edinburgh, 1987), pp. 60–84Google Scholar, 85–112 and 139–62; Donaldson, G., Scotland James V – James VII (Edinburgh, 1971)Google Scholar. For biographies of the most prominent Anglophiles of the era see Lee, M., James Stewart earl of Moray: A political study of the Reformation in Scotland (New York, 1953)Google Scholar; Lee, M., John Maitland of Thirlstane and the foundation of Stewart despotism in Scotland (Princeton, 1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hewitt, G., Scotland under Morton 1572–80 (Edinburgh, 1982)Google Scholar. For the diplomatic context see Dawson, J. E. A., ‘William Cecil and the British dimension of early Elizabethan foreign policy’;, History, LXXIV (1989), 196–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 A few years later, when Kellie had announced his intention to retire, Mar asked him to recommend ‘the choice of a man to lie at Court for him’. Kellie suggested Mar's own son, Henry, but on a previous occasion had advised that there was no real substitute for Mar's own presence, Lindsay, Alexander, earl of Crawford, , The earldom of Mar (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1882), I, 404Google Scholar; Report of the historical manuscripts commission on the manuscripts of the earl of Mar and Kellie (2 vols., London, 1904 and 1930), II, 41Google Scholar.

3 On this question of access see Cuddy, N., ‘The king's chambers, the bedchamber of James I in administration and politics 1603–1625’ (unpublished D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1987)Google Scholar; N. Cuddy, ‘The revival of the entourage: the bedchamber of James I, 1603–1625’ and Sharpe, K., ‘The image of virtue: the court and household of Charles I, 1625–1642’ both in Starkey, D., ed., Tht English court from the Wars of the Roses to the Civil War (Harlow, 1987), pp. 173–225Google Scholar, 226–60. On the general background of the English court see Elton, G. R., ‘Tudor government: the point of contact, III. The court’ Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, XXVI (1976), 211–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Loades, D., The Tudor court (London, 1986)Google Scholar. For some discussion of the accessibility of the Scottish court before 1603 see Cuddy, , ‘The king's chambers’ pp. 10–14Google Scholar, and Brown, K. M., Bloodfeud in Scotland, 1573–1625: violence, justice and politics in an early modem society (Edinburgh, 1986), pp. 108–23Google Scholar.

4 Burton, J. H. and others, eds., The register of the privy council of Scotland [hereafter RPC], first series (14 vols., Edinburgh, 1877–1898), IX, 173–4Google Scholar. Charles issued similar proclamations to the nobility in England to reside at home where they were to provide good government and hospitality, see Sharpe, K., Criticism and compliment: the politics of literature in the England of Charles I (London, 1986), p. 9Google Scholar. For a stimulating discussion of this theme see Heal, F., ‘The idea of hospitality in early modern England’ Past and Present, CII (1984), 66–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In England, as in Scotland, there were complaints about noblemen deserting the countryside for London and the court.

5 SirBalfour, J., The historical works of Sir James Balfour, ed.Haig, J. (4 vols., Edinburgh, 1824–1825), II, 116–17Google Scholar; Nichols, J., ed., The progresses of James the first (4 vols., London, 1828), II, 493–504Google Scholar. At Prince Henry's funeral in 1612 the Scots played a prominent part in the proceedings. Nichols, , Progresses, II, 493–504Google Scholar; Strong, R., Henry, Prince of Wales and England's lost Renaissance (London, 1986), pp. 220–5Google Scholar; Parry, G., The golden age, the culture of the Stuart court, 1603–42 (Manchester, 1981), pp. 86–91Google Scholar.

6 BL Add MSS 12,496 fo. 41.

7 The masquers in 1608 included the second duke of Lennox, his brother Esme, Lord d'Aubigny, Sir James Hay, Robert, eighth Lord Sanquar, Sir John Kennedy and John, Master of Erskine; Orgel, S. ed., Ben Johnson. The complete masques (New Haven and London, 1975), pp. 107–21Google Scholar, 256–62, 316–73. In 1621 the second marquis of Hamilton and the first earl of Buccleuch were alluded to in The gypsies metamorphosed.

8 In the 1618 tilt there were four Scots among the forty-one participants, Lennox, Hamilton, Dingwall, Lord and Hay, Nichols, Progresses, III, 472–3Google Scholar. Nicholas Breton's poem ‘The hate of treason, with a touch of the late treason’ denouncing the gunpowder plot was dedicated to Lennox, and Dr David Owen, chaplain to John Ramsay, first earl of Holdernesse, dedicated his anti-catholic tract, ‘Detection Calumniarum’ to his patron in 1621, BL Ro. 17c, xxxiv; BL Ro. 10b, xiii. For Hamilton's art collection there are some comments in Rubinstein, H. L., Captain luckless. James, first duke of Hamilton 1606–1649 (Edinburgh, 1975), pp. 46–7Google Scholar; Marshall, R. K., The days of Duchess Anne. Life in the household of the duchess of Hamilton (London, 1973), pp. 44–5Google Scholar. For Carlisle's contribution to court extravagance, R. E. Schreiber, The first Carlisle. Sir James Hay, first earl of Carlisle as courtier, diplomat and entrepreneur, 1580 –1636 (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 74, part 7, 1984), pp. 8 –11.

9 There is an expansive literature on the culture of what in England is called the ‘early Stuart court’ Parry, Golden age; Parry, G., The seventeenth century, the intellectual and cultural context of English literature (Harlow, 1989), pp. 9–41Google Scholar; Goldberg, J., James I and the politics of literature (Baltimore, 1983)Google Scholar; Smuts, R. M., Court culture and the origins of a royalist tradition in early Stuart England (Philadelphia, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bergeron, D. M., English civic pageantry 1558–1642 (London, 1971)Google Scholar; Strong, Henry, Prince of Wales; Sharpe, Criticism and compliment; Sharpe, K. and Zwicker, S. N., eds., The politics of discourse. The literature and history of seventeenth century England (Berkeley, 1987)Google Scholar; Strong, R., Art and power. Renaissance festivals 1450–1650 (Woodbridge, Suffolk, 1984), pp. 153–70Google Scholar; Orgel, S., The illusion of power (Berkeley and London, 1975)Google Scholar; Orgel ed., Ben Johnson: The complete masques; Orgel, S. and Strong, R., Inigo Jones: the theatre of the Stuart court (2 vols., Berkeley, 1973)Google Scholar.

10 Donaldson, , James V–James VII, pp. 259–60Google Scholar; M.Spiller, ‘Poetry after the union 1603–1660’ and Reid, D., ‘Prose after Knox’ in Jack, R. D. S. ed., The history of Scottish literature. Vol. I. Origins to 1660 (Mediaeval and renaissance) (4 vols., Aberdeen, 1988), pp. 141–60Google Scholar, 183–9550. Reid, D., ‘Royalty and self-absorption in Drummond's poetry’ Studies in Scottish literature, XXII (1987), 115–31Google Scholar. For some interesting observations on Alexander see Williamson, A. H., ‘Scotland, Antichrist and the invention of Great Britain’ in Dwyer, J., Mason, R. A., Murdoch, A. eds., New perspectives on the culture of early modern Scotland (Edinburgh, 1980), pp. 50–2Google Scholar. The Scottish input to Prince Henry's court largely was ignored by Strong, Henry Prince of Wales, whose search for a lost English renaissance led him to overlook the British dimension to Henry's court.

11 The tension between James's British vision and English imperialism is apparent in 1610 in The speeches at Prince Henry's Barriers, see Orgel, ed., Ben Johnson, pp. 142–58Google Scholar; Williams, C., ‘Merlin and the Prince: the Speaches at Prince Henry's Barriers’ in Renaissance Drama, VIII (1977), 221–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strong, , Henry Prince of Wales, pp. 141–51Google Scholar. For the Banqueting hall see Strong, R., Britannia Triumphans: Inigo Jones, Rubens and Whitehall Palace (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Gordon, D.J., ‘Rubens and the Whitehall ceiling’ in Orgel, S. ed., The renaissance imagination (Berkeley and London, 1980), pp. 24–50Google Scholar. There was a great deal of debate in England over the issue of English national identity and the idea of Britain, see Kendrick, T. D., British antiquity (London, 1950)Google Scholar; MacDougall, H. A., Racial myth in English history, Trojans, Teutons and Anglo Saxons (Montreal, 1982)Google Scholar; Piggot, S., Ancient Britain, the antiquarian imagination. Ideas from the renaissance to the regency (London, 1989)Google Scholar. On the idea of Britain in the context of Scotland's public culture see Williamson, A. H., Scottish national consciousness in the reign of James VI (Edinburgh, 1979)Google Scholar.

12 Orgel, ed., Ben Johnson, pp. 142–58Google Scholar. Needless to say, the Irish were mocked in Johnson's The Irish masque at court, ibid. pp. 206–12, and the Welsh in For the honor of Wales, ibid. pp. 277–91. That there were strong racial tensions was hardly surprising. For an introduction to the nature of such confrontations see Banton, M., Racial and ethnic competition (Cambridge, 1983)Google Scholar, and Horowitz, D. L., Ethnic groups in conflict (London, 1985)Google Scholar.

13 Orgel, ed., Johnson. The complete masques, pp. 316–73Google Scholar. In Coelum Britannium Thomas Carew celebrated the ‘reunification’ of Britain and identified the triumph of British virtues with Charles's kingship. Both Scottish and English peers participated in the masque, and Jones's stage brilliantly represented the British nature of the monarchy, Orgel, and Strong, eds., Inigo Jones, I, 371–5Google Scholar.

14 Nichols, , Progresses, II, 49–52Google Scholar. On the island theme see Endright, M. J., ‘Kingjames and his island: an archaic kingship belief?’ Scottish History Review, LV (1976), 29–40Google Scholar; Bennet, J. W., ‘Britain among the fortunate isles’ Studies in Philosophy, III (1956), 114–40Google Scholar.

15 SirWeldon, A., ‘The court and character of King James’ in Secret history of the court of James the first (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1811), I, 376Google Scholar; Hyde, E., earl of Clarendon, History of the rebellion (6 vols., Oxford, 1888), I, 77Google Scholar. This description of Somerset was not entirely true, and as late as 1643 one finds him writing to his nephew in Scotland about family matters, Hume of Marchmont MSS SRO GD 158/2809. Carlisle also retained good relations with his Hay relatives throughout his life.

16 Weldon, , ‘A perfect description of the people and country of Scotland’ in Secret history, II, 86Google Scholar. Weldon was right about the continuing attraction of France among Scots. What recommended courtiers like Sir James Hay or Esme, Lord d'Aubigny to James was their French training. It is significant that after a spell at Merton College, Oxford in 1638 Charles sent James Livingston of Kinnaird to ‘be bred in France’ before finding him a place in the bedchamber. Clarendon, , History, III, 396Google Scholar. While he was at Merton, Laud took an interest in his progress, Bruce, J. and others eds., Calendar of state papers, domestic series of the reign of Charles I, 1639–40 (23 vols., London, 1858–1897), p. 510Google Scholar.

17 Clarendon, , History, I, 161Google Scholar.

18 Nichols, , Progresses, II, 413–14Google Scholar.

19 Donaldson, , ‘Foundations of Anglo-Scottish union’ pp. 148–51Google Scholar; Brown, , ‘Price of friendship’ p. 141Google Scholar; Bald, M. A., ‘The pioneers of Anglicized speech in Scotland’ Scottish History Review, XXIV (1927), 186–93Google Scholar; Wormald, J. M., ‘James VI and I: two kings or one?’ History, LXVIII (1983), 191Google Scholar. Spiller argues that the abandonment of written Scots for English had nothing to do with national consciousness – ‘The issue was not patriotism, but propriety’ – but this still does not explain why English should be linked with propriety, Spiller, , ‘Poetry after the union’ p. 142Google Scholar. The lack of patronage within Scotland and the standardization of texts by printers also contributed to this erosion of Scots as a written medium, Reid, , ‘Prose after Knox’ pp. 183–8Google Scholar. For a wider discussion of this issue see Milroy, J. and Milroy, L., Authority in language: investigating language, prescription and standardisation (London, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Levack, B., The formation of the British state: England, Scotland and the union 1603–1707 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 185–6Google Scholar; Nichols, , Progresses, 1, 555–6Google Scholar; Laing, D., ed., Correspondence of Sir Robert Kerr, first earl ofAncrum and his son William, third earl of Lothian (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1875), I, 16Google Scholar. In 1605 five Scottish courtiers received an MA from Oxford.

21 Nichols, , Progresses, III, 345Google Scholar.

22 Gordon, P. of Ruthven, , A short abridgement of Britain's distemper (Spalding Club, Aberdeen, 1844,), pp. 76, 229–30Google Scholar.

23 Mar and Kellie; Ancrum and Lothian.

24 Rogers, C., Memorials of the earl of Stirling and the house of Alexander (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1877), I, 32–204Google Scholar; Brown, K. M., ‘Courtiers and cavaliers: service, anglicization and loyalty among the royalist nobility’ in Morrill, J. S., ed., The National covenant in its British context 1638–1651 (Edinburgh, 1990), pp. 162–4Google Scholar.

25 The title of the Douglas family history typifies the way in which noble houses saw themselves at the centre of Scottish history, Hume, D., A general history of Scotland from the year 767 to the death of King James (London, 1657)Google Scholar; SirGordon, R., A genealogical history of the earldom of Sutherland (Edinburgh, 1813)Google Scholar; Stuart, J. ed., Registrum de Panmure (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1874), I, P. xliiiGoogle Scholar. Among the many other family histories of the period were Pitcairn, R., ed., Historical account of the principal families of the name of Kennedy (Edinburgh, 1830)Google Scholar; ‘A genealogical account of the family of Bruce of Earlshall’ (c. 1635), National Library of Scotland, Adv. Lib. MS 33.2.27 fo. 315; The black book of Taymouth (Bannatyne Club, Edinburgh, 1855)Google Scholar. Legal searches such as that conducted by Mar in his obsessive pursuit to restore Erskine control of the ancient earldom of Mar also encouraged historical research. See ‘The true estate of the lordship of Gareoch and Earldome of Mar their 400 years begane’ SRO Mar and Kellie muniments GD 124/5/7–11.

26 Strong, R., Tudor and Jacobean portraits (2 vols., London, 1969), for Lennox, I, 264–5Google Scholar and II, 518–19; Somerset, I, 295–7 and II, 579–83.

27 Macgibbon, D. and Ross, T., The castellated and domestic architecture of Scotland from the twelfth to the eighteenth century (5 vols., Edinburgh, 1887–1892), IIGoogle Scholar; Fenwick, H., Scottish baronial houses (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Ancrum and Lothian, 1, 62–76.

28 For some flavour of this see French connection. Scotland and the arts of France (Edinburgh, HMSO, 1985). PP. 29–54Google Scholar.

29 From February 1604 attendance a t court required a licence, RPC, VI, 602, and for those sent home in August 1603, ibid, XIV, 407. The prospects for even middle ranking servants were attractive, for example Sir Robert Aitoun, the younger son of a minor Fife laird, went south as Queen Anne's secretary an d master of requests an d was soon earning £1,000 p.a., the equivalent of £12,000 Scots, Aylmer, G. E., The king's servants: the civil service of Charles 11625–1647 (London, 1974), p. 162Google Scholar.

30 Seddon, P. R., ‘Patronage an d officers in the reign of Jame s I’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, 1967), pp. 169–70Google Scholar, 293–310.

31 Hope, J. ed., State papers and miscellaneous correspondence of Thomas, earl of Melrose (2 vols., Abbotsford Club, Edinburgh, 1837), I, 190Google Scholar; Cuddy, ‘King's chambers’; Cuddy, , ‘The revival of the entourage’ especially pp. 188–90Google Scholar. The full list of Scottish gentlemen in the Jacobean bedchamber is: Ludovick Stewart, second duke of Lennox (first lord of the bedchamber), SirErskine, Thomas (groom of the stool), SirHume, George (keeper of the privy purse), Stewart, Esme, d'Aubigny, Lord, SirPreston, Richard, SirRamsay, John, SirHay, James, SirAston, Roger (an Englishman who had served James as his master huntsman since c. 1580) all appointed in 1603Google Scholar; Sir Robert Ker, 1607; James Hamilton, second marquis of Hamilton, 1620; John Murray, earl of Annandale, 1622. Until 1617 all the grooms were Scots, but between 1617 and 1622 six English grooms were appointed. Among the Scots were John Murray who was promoted to gentleman in 1622, and Sir Patrick Maule of Panmure and James Maxwell of Innerwick who were to rise to greater favour under Charles I.

32 Seddon, , ‘Patronage and officers’ pp. 155–72Google Scholar, appendix 3; Carlisle, N., An enquiry into the place and quality of the privy chamber (London, 1829)Google Scholar; Mar and Kellie, II, 127. Ten of the sixteen Scots had pensions of between £100 and £300 per annum, exceeding all but one Englishman. The twenty-four Scots appointed in 1603 were Sir Francis Stewart, brother to the earl of Moray and a soldier, Sir Patrick Murray, later third earl of Tullibardine, Sir William Stewart, Sir John Graham, Sir William Anstruther and his brother Sir Robert Anstruther, Sir James Auchterlony, Thomas Lumsden, Sir Henry Balfour, brother of Lord Balfour, Sir Robert Maxwell, Sir Archibald Napier, the future treasurer-depute and first Lord Napier, Sir George Hay, the future lord chancellor and first earl of Kinnoul, Sir John Lindsay, Sir James Erskine, son of the earl of Mar who acquired the earldom of Buchan by marriage, Walter Stewart, son of Lord Blantyre, and Sir William Balfour who became lieutenant of the Tower of London in 1630. Details of most of these men can be found in Paul, J. B. (ed.), The Scots peerage (9 vols., Edinburgh, 1910–1959)Google Scholar; Cockayne, G. E. (ed.), The complete peerage (13 vols., London, 1904–1914)Google Scholar; SirDouglas, R. (ed.), The complete baronage of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1798)Google Scholar; Stephen, L. and other eds., Dictionary of national biography (London, 1885–1913)Google Scholar.

33 Seddon, , ‘Patronage and officers’ pp. 155–72Google Scholar and appendix 3; Mar and Kellie, II, 193.

34 Sharpe, , ‘The image of virtue’ in Starkey, ed., English court, pp. 226–60Google Scholar; Brown, , ‘Courtiers and cavaliers’ in Morrill, ed., The Motional Convenant in its British context, pp. 155–92Google Scholar; Mar and Kellie, II, 227. Only William Murray and Lennox were younger than the king. As prince of Wales, Charles's household was dominated by Scots who held the important offices of groom of the stool, keeper of the privy purse, treasurer, master of the household, both secretaries, five gentlemen of the bedchamber an d eight of the grooms, Seddon, , ‘Patronage and officers’ pp. 164–6Google Scholar, 308–9.

35 BL Harl. 7623 fo. 9. However, Princess Mary's governess was the countess of Roxburghe.

36 Clarendon, , History, I, 207Google Scholar; BL Eg. 2597 fo. 32.

37 Levack, , Formation of the British state, pp. 31–67Google Scholar.

38 Wormald, J. M., Court, kirk and community, Scotland 1470–1625 (London, 1981), pp. 151–2Google Scholar; Brown, , Bloodfeud, pp. 219–29Google Scholar, 233–5.

39 Brown, , Bloodfeud, pp. 229–33Google Scholar; Levack, , British state, pp. 68–101Google Scholar; Galloway, B., The union of England and Scotland 1603–1608 (Edinburgh, 1986), pp. 24–5Google Scholar, 38–41, 145–7; Prest, w. R., The Inns of Court under Elizabeth and the early Stuarts, 1590–1640 (London, 1972), pp. 32–3Google Scholar.

40 Levack, , British state, pp. 59–63Google Scholar; Galloway, , Union, pp. 41–2Google Scholar. One minor exception was Somerset's tenure as acting secretary of state 1612–14 and lord privy seal 1614–16.

41 Levack, , British state, pp. 62–4Google Scholar.

42 Mar and Kellie, II, 46.

43 Donald, P., An uncounselled king. Charles I and the Scottish troubles, 163J–1641 (Cambridge, 1991), p. 96Google Scholar.

44 On 4 May 1603 Lennox, Mar, Kinloss, Sir George Hum e an d Sir James Elphinstone were appointed to the privy council, and Lord Hume was added before the end of the year. By 1625 Dunfermline, , Kellie, , Somerset, , Hamilton, , Haddington, , Carlisle, and SirHay, George had joined them, Dasent, J. R., ed., Acts of the privy council of England, new series (23 vols., London, 1890–1907), XXXII, 496–7Google Scholar; Lyte, H. C. M. ed., Acts of the privy council of England in the reign of James I,1613–1614 (8 vols., London, 1916–1933), pp. 3–4Google Scholar; APC James 1615–16, p. 454; APC James 1616–17, p. 201; APC James /6/0–21, pp. 357–8; APC James, 1623–25, pp. 1–2. For examples of committee membership see Turner, E. R., The privy council of England in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (2 vols., Baltimore, 1930–1932), II, 212–17Google Scholar; Carlyle, E. I., ‘Committees of council under the early Stuarts’ English Historical Review, XXI (1906), 673–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For membership of Charles's English council see Aylmer, , King's servants, pp. 19–20Google Scholar, 24–5. From the start the London based councillors made little effort to attend meetings of the Scottish privy council. For example between 1604 and 1607 Lennox attended the privy council in Edinburgh six times, Kellie twice. Of course it is very difficult to estimate the amount of counsel they gave James or Charles at court. At the 1610 reconstruction of the council all the courtiers but Dunbar were removed, although most were later restored, RPC, first series, VII, 815–16; IX, p. XV; X, pp. xii–xiii. A small number of English noblemen were given places on the Scottish privy council in 1617 and their presence was confirmed at various stages until 1631 when Charles had them removed. However, in 1633 Englishmen were again given seats on the council, Turner, , Privy council, I, 148Google Scholar; Aylmer, , King's servants, p. 24Google Scholar; RPC, first series, XI, pp. cli–cii; RPC, second series, I, 248–52; IV, 187–90; V, 116.

45 Peck, L. L., Court, patronage and corruption in early Stuart England (Boston, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, J. C., ‘Proto corruption in early Stuart England’ in Scott, J. C. ed., Comparative political corruption (Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1972), pp. 37–55Google Scholar; Peck, L. L., ‘Court patronage and government policy: the Jacobean dilemma’ in Lyttle, G. F. and Orgel, S. eds., Patronage in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1981), pp. 27–46Google Scholar; Aylmer, , King's servants, p. 248Google Scholar; Seddon, ‘Patronage and officers’ all demonstrate how the system of government functioned amidst customary exchanges of gifts, bribery and ‘fees’.

46 Registrum de Panmure, I, pp. xxxviii–xxxix.

47 SirPeyton, E., ‘The divine catastrophe of the kingly family of the house of Stuart’ in Secret history, II, 343–4Google Scholar.

48 BL Add. MSS 12,506 fo. 27.

49 Nichols, , Progresses, I, 426–7Google Scholar, 288–9; Levack, , British state, p. 195Google Scholar. In 1603–4 the largest sum to an English client was £666 for Arabella Stuart, while the earls of Linlithgow and Moray, Sir George Hume and Sir Walter Aston each had in excess of £1,000. In 1610 d'Aubigny had £18,000, Haddington £7,200, Dunbar and Kinloss £2,000 each, Sir Patrick Murray £1,800, the earl of Home and Lord Gordon £1,000, the others lesser sums.

50 Cuddy, , ‘King's chambers’ pp. 84–90Google Scholar; Seddon, , ‘Patronage and officers’ pp. 175–222Google Scholar. Sir Robert Ker of Ancram had a pension for £300 p.a., which he sold in 1632 for £600 (courtiers like Carlisle turned pensions into cash immediately), SR.O Lothian muniments GD 40/5/20/4; for debts assigned to Dunbar in 1606, BL Add. MSS 12,497 fo. 153; and for concealed lands granted to d'Aubigny BL Add. MSS 36, 767 fos. 236, 240. In 1625 Ancram had a gift of a share in the import of starch into England, Mathew, D., Scotland under Charles I (London, 1955), pp. 232–3Google Scholar notes; d'Aubigny had an interest in the leather trade, BL Add. MS S 38, 170 fos. 87b, 142, 258.

51 Schreiber, Carlisle, chs. i, 2, 5, 6; ‘Aulicus Coquinarie’ in Secret history, II, 160–5.

52 Stone, L., The crisis of the aristocracy (Oxford, 1965), pp. 475–6Google Scholar; Wormald, , ‘Two kings or one?’ p. 207Google Scholar; Cuddy, , ‘Bedchamber’ p. 198Google Scholar, n. 65.

53 Hamilton controlled a very large budget as master of the horse and had a share in the wine trade, while Lennox had a farm of the aulnage duties on manufactured cloth and a number of pensions from the exchequer, Aylmer, , King's servants, p. 350Google Scholar.

54 DNB, XV, 345–6.

55 Aylmer, , King's servants, pp. 317–18Google Scholar. The extent to which a successful court career lay in the hands of the patron is demonstrated in the case of Sir David Murray, groom of the stool and gentleman of the robes to Prince Henry (‘the only man in whom he had put Choise Trust’), whose brilliant future was cut short by Henry's death in 1612. Strong, , Henry Prince of Wales, p. 28Google Scholar; DNB, XXXIX, 352–3.

56 ‘Scotland's welcome to her native sonne and soveraigne lord, King Charles’ in The poetical remains of William Lithgow (Edinburgh, 1863)Google Scholar.

57 Weldon, , ‘Court and character’ in Secret history, I, 371–2Google Scholar.

58 Roxburghe muniments NRA 1100/1207. Roxburghe's wife had a court career of her own, being governess to Charles's younger children, but wives were usually left at home, see for example Mar and Kellie, I, 57.

59 Mar and Kellie, I, 84. For the third marquis see Burnet, G., The memoirs of the lives and actions of James and William dukes of Hamilton and Castle Herald (London, 1677), p. 3Google Scholar; SRO Hamilton MS GD 406/1/150–1, 8228, 8230. I am grateful to Mr John Scally for these references.

60 Fraser, W., The book of Carlaverock (Edinburgh, 1873), II, 338Google Scholar.

61 Mar and Kellie, II, 99. Mar found the London climate detrimental to his health, and even made out his will before going south in 1609, ibid. 1, 59—60.

62 Mar and Kellie, I, 109. For some comments on relative deprivation and the nobility see Stevenson, D., The Scottish revolution 1637–44. The triumph of the Covenanters (Newton Abbot, 1973), pp. 319–20Google Scholar.

63 Clarendon, , History, I, 107–8Google Scholar. For the broad economic context of aristocratic economics, Brown, K. M., ‘Aristocratic finances and the origins of the Scottish Revolution’ EHR, LIV (1989), 46–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, K. M., ‘Noble indebtedness in Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution’ in Historical Research, LXII (1989), 260–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Nichols, , Progresses, III, 334Google Scholar, 336, 347. The full account of the 1617 trip is in Nichols, , Progresses, III, 300–90Google Scholar, and see Bergeron, , English civic pageantry, pp. 102–3Google Scholar. The earl of Pembroke made a return journey to Scotland in 1618, ibid, III, 555–6. On 1633 see Clarendon, , History, I, 107–8Google Scholar, and for a full account of the 1633 expedition see Balfour, , Works, II, 194–204Google Scholar. For a more critical description of Scotland by Englishmen see Weldon, , ‘Perfect description’ in Secret history, II, 75–89Google Scholar.

65 Weldon, , ‘Court and Character’ in Secret history, I, 371—2Google Scholar. Dunbar's daughters married Sir James Hume of Coldenknowes and the younger, Elizabeth, married the second earl of Suffolk.

66 Dunbar outflanked the hapless SirCarey, Robert over Norham Castle – ‘he begged the keeping of it over my head’ Carey confessed – Nichols, , Progresses, I, 247–8Google Scholar. A few Scots also were found in other northern offices, for example Sir Thomas Kirkpatrick was surveyor of the lands in the north parts of the duchy of Lancaster and Adam Newton was secretary to the council of the north, Seddon, , ‘Patronage and officers’ pp. 300Google Scholar, 303.

67 Complete peerage, XII, part 1, 67; Seddon, , ‘Patronage and officers’ pp. 92–5Google Scholar.

68 Schreiber, , Carlisle, p. 6Google Scholar. The second earl of Carlisle inherited the Denny estate, and was a justice of the peace for Buckinghamshire in 1636 and joint lieutenant of Essex in 1641.

69 Scots peerage, III, 474–8; Complete peerage, I, 58–9; II, 350–1; V, 41–2.

70 Scots peerage, V, 356—61; Complete peerage, VII, 604—7, 609–11; IX, 831—3; Doyle, , Barons of England, II, 473Google Scholar; III, 121–2, 124–5; DNB, LV, 85–6, 107–8. The London house was granted in 1612, BL Add. MSS 5750, fo. 138. It was 1628 before the fourth duke of Lennox was able to move into Cobham House where the forfeited Lord Cobham's widow was permitted to live.

71 Scots peerage, IV, 300–1; Complete peerage, VI, 231, 534; Doyle, , Barons of England, II, 202Google Scholar; DNB, XLVII, 257–8; NRA 832A/1/104–5, 109, i n, 113; BL Add. MSS 5755, fo. 60. At various times he also had lands in Lincoln, Surrey, Norfolk and at Kingston-upon-Thames.

72 Details in Brown, ‘Courtiers and cavaliers’.

73 Weldon, , ‘Cour t and character’ in Secret history, I, 372Google Scholar.

74 Gillespie, R., Colonial Ulster. The settlement of east Ulster 1600–1641 (Cork, 1985)Google Scholar; Perceval-Maxwell, M., The Scottish migration to Ulster in the reign of James I (New York, 1973)Google Scholar; Hill, G., An historical account of the plantation in Ulster at the commencement of the seventeenth century (Shannon, 1970)Google Scholar.

75 BL HI, 1583/25. One of the other partners was the earl of Arundel.

76 Macinnes, A. I., ‘The origin and organisation of the covenanting movement during the reign of Charles I, 1625–41 with a particular reference to the west of Scotland’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, 1987), II, 35–6Google Scholar n. 34; Rubinstein, , Captain Luckless, p. 46Google Scholar.

77 BL Add. Charter 6224.

78 Sainty, J. C., ‘Lieutenants of counties, 1585–1642’ in Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, Special Supplement, VIII (1970), pp. 15Google Scholar, 19–20, 23–5, 33, 40. The full list of Scottish lord lieutenants was: Dunbar in Cumberland, Northumberland and Durha III 1607–11; Somerset in Durham 1615–17; d'Aubigny in Huntingdon, 1619–24; second duke of Lennox in Kent and the Liberty of the Cinque Ports, 1620–4; Holdernesse in Surrey, 1624–6; fourth duke of Lennox in Hampshire 1635–42, Cinque Ports, 1640–2; second earl of Carlisle, Essex, 1641–2. Both the fourth duke of Lennox and the second earl of Carlisle were English. In addition to the lieutenants, Sir James Campbell was a commissioner for London in 1639 and 1640. These offices did involve responsibilities, for example see Lennox in Kent in 1622, BL Eg. 2552, fo. 6.

79 BLEg. 2552, fo. 31.

80 Sommerville, R., Office holders in the duchy and county Palatine of Lancaster from 1603 (London and Chichester, 1972), p. 174Google Scholar; Scots peerage, III, 477—8; Complete peerage, V, 41—2.

81 Clarendon, , History, I, 447Google Scholar. In addition to those palaces and parks above, Ancram, had a reversionary grant of the keepership of Marlebone Park in c. 1630Google Scholar, BL Eg. 2553, fo. 82.

82 A visit to the ruins of Carlaverock ought to cure anyone of the idea that Scottish courtiers were uninterested absentees.

83 As early as January 1604 Mar sold the manors of Sandon and Walton on Thames in Surrey and Ryver in Sussex to Sir Baptist Hicks to whom he owed money, GD 124/1/1196 and 1200. Two days later he sold the hundred, lordship and manor of Odyham, Southampton to William Herrick, a London goldsmith, and his partner, James Hudson, a London merchant who had long been trading in Edinburgh, GD 124/1/1197. Shortly after this Mar mortgaged the lordship and manor of Charleton in Kent to William Palmer, a London haberdasher, to whom he eventually sold the property in 1607, GD 124/1/1202 and 1205. The manor of Fareham in Essex was disposed of to Peter Vanloor, another London merchant in November 1606, GD 124/1/1203. Mar also brought Hudson and Martin Lumley, a London draper, into partnership in exploiting the sale of trees from his manor of Hunden in Suffolk until they sold it to Lord Cavendish in 1611, GD 124/1/1198–9 and 1209. For debts to Englishmen in 1603–5 see GD 124/2/4–8. Other lands disposed of were the manors of Northstoke, Somerset, Kidbroke, Sandon Chappell, in Surrey, lands at Chedworth in Gloucester, Tillington in Sussex GD 124/1 /1195, 1201 and 1204. Mar and Lord Erskine were appointed bailiff and joint keeper of the house and park of Hatfield and Thome, Yorkshire for their lives, GD 124/1/1208. The property retained for William Erskine was at Sevenhampton, Somerset, GD 124/1/1212.

84 Mar and Kellie, II, 125.

85 SRO GD 112/39/385.

86 SRO GD 45/14/1–115. For Ancram, SRO GD 40/2; Annandale, Inventory of the Murrays of Murraythwaite SRO GD 219/281 for correspondence with his chamberlain 1636–42; Tullibardine's correspondence with Glenorchy, SRO Breadalbane Callendar of Letters GD 112/39/361.; for Mar, SRO GD 124/1.

87 ' SRO GD 29/C/60.

88 Nichols, , Progresses, III, 97Google Scholar.

89 Mar and Kellie, 11, 55.

90 Mar and Kellie, I, 68. Needless to say, James ignored his own resolution. For Charles's creations, Nichols, , Progresses, I, xxix–xxxviGoogle Scholar; Balfour, , Works, II, 202–3Google Scholar and BL Add. MSS 5758 fo. 244 for 1633.

91 On the sale of honours Stone, , Crisis of the aristocracy, pp. 65–128Google Scholar.

92 Nichols, , Progresses, I, 284Google Scholar. On occasion there was violence between the two factions as in 1612 when Sir John Ramsay struck the earl of Montgomery at a race at Croydon, ibid, II, 438–9.

93 Levack, , British state, pp. 187–8Google Scholar.

94 Lennox's earldom came only after frantic lobbying to keep up with Rochester, Nichols, , Progresses, II, 641Google Scholar. For a description of Rochester's creation BL Add. MSS 14,417 fo. 44. The full list is Sir George Hume, created Lord Home of Berwick in 1604; Sir Robert Ker, created Viscount Rochester in 1611 and earl of Somerset in 1613; the second duke of Lennox, created earl of Richmond in 1613, and duke of Richmond in 1623; Sir James Hay, created Lord Hay of Sawley in 1615, Viscount Doncaster in 1618, and earl of Carlisle in 1622; the second marquis of Hamilton, created earl of Cambridge in 1619; Esme, Lord d'Aubigny, created earl of March in 1619; Viscount Ramsay, created earl of Holdernesse in 1620.

95 Nichols, , Progresses, III, 94Google Scholar.

96 Levack, , British state, p. 188Google Scholar. The first Scots to sit in the commons were Sir Robert Ker of Ancram and William Murray in 1625. William Hamilton, first earl of Lanark sat for Portsmouth in 1640, Return of the names of every member to serve in each parliament (2 vols., London, 1878), I, 462–84Google Scholar.

97 At this time Charles also revived the dorman t Richmond title for the fourth duke of Lennox. There ha d been speculation in 1631 that Ancram would get an English peerage, Ancrton and Lothian, I, 56.

98 Complete baronetage, I, 135.

99 Complete peerage, I, 2. The full list is earl of Desmond in 1614; Lord Strabane in 1616; Lord Castlestuart in 1619; Lord Balfour in 1619; Viscount Montgomery in 1622; Viscount Clandeboyne in 1622. The Balfour title was extinct by 1634.

100 Rait, R. S., The parliaments of Scotland (Glasgow, 1924), pp. 185–7Google Scholar; Osborne, , ‘Memoirs’ in Secret history, I, 259Google Scholar; Balfour, , Works, II, 81Google Scholar; Macinnes, A. I., Charles I and the making of the covenanting movement 1625–1641 (Edinburgh, 1991), p. 134Google Scholar.

101 Cockayne, G. E. ed., The complete baronetage (5 vols., Exeter, 1900–1906), II, 277–454Google Scholar. Four of the Englishmen were from Yorkshire, a county with strong Scottish connections.

102 Nicolas, N. H., History of the orders of knighthood in the British Empire (4 vols., London, 1842), I, 210–37Google Scholar, lxv–lxvi; Nichols, , Progresses, I, 193–4Google Scholar; II, 196; III, 79, 177; Beltz, G. F., Memorials of the order of the garter (London, 1841), pp. clxxxiv–clxxxixGoogle Scholar; Sharpe, , ‘The image of virtue’ pp. 241–2Google Scholar. The full list of Scots was the second duke of Lennox and Mar in 1603, Dunbar in 1608, Rochester in 1611, Kellie in 1615, the second marquis of Hamilton in 1623, the third duke of Lennox and Carlisle in 1624, the third marquis of Hamilton in 1630, the fourth duke of Lennox and the sixth earl of Morton in 1633.

103 Nicolas, , Orders of knighthood, III, xiv–xviiGoogle Scholar; Nichols, , Progresses, I, 221–6Google Scholar.

104 Levack, , British state, pp. 183–4Google Scholar; Galloway, , Jacobean union, pp. 103–19Google Scholar, 148–57; for Mar's patent of naturalization see SRO GD 124/10/83, dated 3 September 1603.

105 For an example see Mcllwain, C. H. ed., The political works of James I (Cambridge, Mass., 1918), pp. 271–3Google Scholar, ‘I am the Husband, and the whole Isle is my lawful Wife’.

106 Orgel, ed., Complete masques, pp. 75–106Google Scholar; Gordon, D. J., ‘Hymenaei; Ben Johnson's masque of union’ in Orgel, ed., Renaissance imagination, pp. 157–84Google Scholar. Strangely the Haddington Masque which did celebrate an Anglo–Scottish marriage had little to say on this subject, D. J. Gordon, ‘Ben Johnson's Haddington Masque’ ibid. pp. 185–93.

107 Nichols, , Progresses, I, 193–5Google Scholar. It was rumoured that James paid John Elverton £500–£600 to act as go-between in this match, that he made up Christina Brace's portion, and that Kinloss used his office of master of the rolls to squeeze Cavendish whose wife had a case before him. By October Kinloss's health was failing and Salisbury wrote to Shrewsbury that ‘I now beginne to think that my Lord Cavendish shold repent his marriadge, the Lo. Kinloss being like to die’ ibid. II, 194–5.

108 The full list of Scots serving in the bedchamber of privy chamber who married English women is 1604, Sir James Hay, gentleman of the bedchamber married Honora Denny, daughter of Edward, first Lord Denny; 1604, Sir Thomas Erskine, gentleman of the bedchamber married Elizabeth Pierrepont, widow of Sir Edward Norris and daughter of Sir Henry Pierrepont of Holme Pierrepont (her brother became first earl of Kingston); 1608, Sir John Ramsay, first Viscount Haddington, gentleman of the bedchamber married Elizabeth Radcliffe, daughter of Robert, fifth earl of Sussex; before 1613 Sir Patrick Murray, gentleman of the privy chamber married secondly Elizabeth Dent, widow of Sir Francis Vere and daughter of John Dent of London; 1613, Robert Ker, first earl of Somerset, gentleman of the bedchamber married Francis Howard, former wife of Robert, third earl of Essex and daughter of Thomas, first earl of Suffolk; 1614, Richard Preston, first Lord Dingwall, gentleman of the bedchamber married Elizabeth Butler, widow of Theobald Viscount Butler of Tulleophelim; 1617, James, first Lord Hay, gentleman of the bedchamber married secondly Lucy Percy, daughter of Henry, ninth earl of Northumberland; 1619, Sir John Livingston of Kinnaird, groom of the bedchamber married Jane Sproxtoune, widow of William Marwood and daughter of Richard Sproxtoune of Wakefield; 1621, Sir Robert Ker of Ancram, gentleman of Prince Charles's bedchamber married secondly Anne Stanely, widow of Sir Henry Portman of Orchard Portman and daughter of William, sixth earl of Derby; after 1621, Sir Thoma s Erskine, first earl of Kellie, gentleman of the bedchamber married thirdly Dorothy Smith, widow of Robert, first Viscount Kilmorey and daughter of Humphre y Smith of Cheapside; 1624, Sir John Ramsay, first Viscount Haddington, gentleman of the bedchamber married secondly Martha Cockayne, daughter of Sir William Cockayne of Rushton; after 1628, Jame s Erskine, first earl of Buchan married secondly Dorothy Kynvett, daughter of Sir Philip Kynvett of Buchenham. This list only contains those who began their careers as household servants, not aristocrats like Lennox or Hamilton.

109 Schreiber, , Carlisle, pp. 9–10Google Scholar, 20–1; Nichols, , Progresses, II, 189Google Scholar for an account of the elaborate marriage festivities; ‘Aulus coquinarie’ in Secret history, II, 161.

110 Scots peerage, III, 121–2; Complete peerage, IV, 367.

111 Ancrum and Lothian, I, 27–8.

112 Goodman, S., Thecourtof King James the first (2 vols., London, 1839), I, 392Google Scholar where he explains that ‘Truly Kelly was a very honest natured man, but his own wants and necessity did enforce him to do what he did’. For more of Kellie's English marital problems BL La. 157 fo. 114.

113 Scots peerage, III, 231–6; Complete peerage, I, 68–9; IV, 499–500. In 1611 Sir John Kennedy's marriage to the aunt of the fifth Lord Chandos was the subject of an investigation and it turned out that he was married already, Complete peerage, III, 127. In a quite different type of scandal the earl of Stirling's younger son, Henry (subsequently the third earl) eloped with a daughter of Sir Peter Vanlore on the night before her wedding to an English gentleman in 1637, Scots peerage, VIII, 181.

114 Another of Nottingham's daughters married Alexander Stewart, Lord Garleis in 1627. In 1609 Sir James Stewart, eldest son of Walter Stewart, Prior of Blantyre, married a daughter of George Hastings, fourth earl of Huntingdon. The earl of Galloway's younger son, James Stewart who succeeded his brother as Lord Garleis, married a daughter of Sir Richard Houghton. For all of these marriages see Scots peerage and Complete peerage.

115 Scots peerage, V, 356–61; Complete peerage, VII, 604–7, 609–11; rx, 831–3; Doyle, , Barons of England, II, 473Google Scholar; III, 121–2, 124–5; DJfB, XLVH, 85–6, 107–8. Esme Stewart's marriage involved him in protracted contractual difficulties with Lord Clifton, BL Add. MSS 12,497 fo. 409, BL Add. MSS 38,170 fos. 300–16. In 1626 Elizabeth Stewart married Henry Howard, eldest son and heir of the earl of Arundel, Frances Stewart married Jerome Weston, eldest son and heir of the first earl of Pordand in 1632, Lennox married Buckingham's widowed daughter in 1637, and a year later his brother, George, married a daughter of the earl of Suffolk. The Scottish connections of the family were not entirely forgotten and another of the fourth duke's sisters married Archibald, Lord Douglas, eldest son of the earl of Angus in 1630, while his mother, Catherine Clifton, remarried James Hamilton, second earl of Abercorn in 1632.

116 Scots peerage, III, 474–8; Complete peerage, I, 58–9; II, 350–1; V, 41–2.

117 Scots peerage, IV, 463–7; Complete peerage, VI, 555–6. For the Sutton marriage BL St. 574 fo. 66b. The second earl married c. 1622 Catherine Carey, daughter of Henry, first Viscount Falkland, and then secondly a daughter of Frances Fane, first earl of Westmoreland.

118 Mar and Kellie, II, 123. Nithsdale's marriage had brought him into contact with the enormously rich earl of Cork who wrote of his willingness (but pessimism as to the outcome) to help Nithsdale acquire land in Ireland ‘being the more obliged thereunto by the affinitie that is between your noble Countess and my poor children, whose deaceased mother was allied to her ladyship’ Fraser, W. ed., The book of Carlaverock (2 vols., Edinburgh, 1873), II, 124–5Google Scholar.

119 Scots peerage, III, 231–6; Complete peerage, IV, 499–500.

120 Scots peerage, IV, 286–7; Complete peerage, VI, 101–2.

121 Mar and Kellie, II, 57.

122 Scots peerage, V, 21–5; Complete peerage, VII, 71. Argyll married the daughter of Sir William Cornwallis of Brome in 1610. She was a devoted catholic and minor authoress who converted her husband and was instrumental in causing the breach with his clan. Other Scottish peers with English mothers who were born during this period were the fourth duke of Lennox, fourth earl of Stirling, tenth Lord Boyd, second earl of Elgin, third earl of Abercorn, second earl of Home, second earl of Ancram, first earl of Newburgh, second earl of Nithsdale, second earl of Panmure, fourth earl of Tullibardine and Anne, duchess of Hamilton.

123 Nichols, , Progresses, I, 109Google Scholar; Bl Add. MSS 14,417 fo. 19.

124 Unless otherwise indicated see Scots peerage and Complete peerage. For verses on Lennox's death, BL St, 542, fo. 48; for Spott, Abercairny muniments SRO GD 24/5/144. There was little difference in the death rituals attending aristocrats in the two countries, for England see tings, C. Git, Death, burial and the individual in early modem England (London and Sydney, 1984)Google Scholar.

125 Scots peerage, IV, 465; Complete peerage, VI, 556.

126 Balfour, , Works, II, 102Google Scholar; Mar and Kellie, II, 223; SRO GD 40/2/XV/14.

127 For Buccleuch, , Scots peerage, II, 234Google Scholar; Stirling, ibid, VIII, 176; Kellie, ibid, V, 85–6.

128 Brown, ‘Courtiers and cavaliers’.