Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:06:53.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poland's Colonial Aspirations and the Question of a Mandate over Liberia, 1933–1939

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2021

Milena Skulimowska Open the ORCID record for Milena Skulimowska [Opens in a new window]
Milena Skulimowska*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines Poland's political and economic involvement in Liberia in the 1930s in an attempt to address the question of how countries that were not classical colonial powers were engaging in colonialism. Interwar Poland was a newly established country struggling to achieve political stability and economic growth. Looking for a solution to the economic difficulties, Poland started to show an interest in obtaining colonies in Africa. This interest developed into the colonial movement. Poland attempted to establish a long-lasting economic and political presence in Liberia in the 1930s. This attempt failed; however, Polish involvement in Liberia demonstrates the effect that the idea of colonialism had on Polish society and the Polish government.

Type
Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 730 - 749
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Volker Barth and Roland Cvetkovski, ‘Introduction – encounters of empire: methodological approaches’, in Volker Barth and Roland Cvetkovski, eds., Imperial co-operation and transfer, 1870–1930: empires and encounters (London, 2015), pp. 6–8.

2 Lüthi, Barbara, Falk, Francesca, and Purtschert, Patricia, ‘Colonialism without colonies: examining blank spaces in colonial studies’, National Identities, 18 (2016), pp. 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 John Darwin, ‘Nationalism and imperialism, c. 1880–1940’, in John Breuilly, ed., The Oxford handbook of the history of nationalism (Oxford, 2013), p. 355.

4 Antony Anghie, Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law (Cambridge, 2007), p. 139.

5 Bruce Fetter, Colonial rule in Africa: readings from primary sources (Madison, WI, 1979), p. 107.

6 Jane Burbank, Empires in world history: power and politics of difference (Princeton, NJ, 2010), p. 386.

7 On economic imperialism, see P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, British imperialism, 1688–2000 (Harlow, 2002).

8 Darwin, ‘Nationalism and imperialism’, p. 356.

9 Anghie, Imperialism, sovereignty, p. 142.

10 Susan Pedersen points out that at that time in Germany there was no such thing as colonial policy in itself and the colonial propaganda was aimed at disrupting the Anglo-French entente, forging an Anglo-German alliance and winning Britain's implicit consent to Germany's expansion eastwards. Susan Pedersen, The guardians: the League of Nations and the crisis of empire (Oxford, 2015), pp. 356–7.

11 R. J. Evans, ‘The successor states’, in Robert Gerwarth, ed., Twisted paths: Europe, 1914–1945 (Oxford, 2007), p. 210.

12 E. Garrison Walters, The other Europe: Eastern Europe to 1945 (New York, NY, 1988), p. 171.

13 Prussian rule over the territories annexed from Poland can be considered colonial in several aspects. Róisín Healy, ‘From commonwealth to colony? Poland under Prussia’, in Róisín Healy and Enrico Dal Lago, eds., The shadow of colonialism on Europe's modern past (Basingstoke, 2014), pp. 120–1.

14 Norman Davies, White eagle, red star: the Polish–Soviet war 1919–1920 and ‘The miracle on the Vistula’ (London, 2011), p. 20.

15 Jerzy Lukowski and Hubert Zawadzki, A concise history of Poland (Cambridge, 2001), p. 204.

16 Ibid., pp. 216–17.

17 See Głuchowski, Kazimierz, ‘Koncentrować czy rozpraszać?’, Morze, 12 (1928), pp. 25–6Google Scholar; Załęcki, Gustaw, ‘O istocie przedsiębiorst kolonialnych’, Morze, 1 (1929), pp. 29–31Google Scholar; Program kolonialny Ligi Morskiej i Rzecznej (Warsaw, 1930); Stanisław Pawłowski, Domagajmy się kolonii zamorskich dla Polski (Warsaw, 1936); Wiktor Rosiński, O zamorski program gospodarczy Rzeczypospolitej (Warsaw, 1931).

18 Tadeusz Białas, Liga Morska i Kolonialna, 1930–1939 (Gdańsk, 1983), pp. 40–1.

19 Milena Skulimowska, ‘Polish colonial aspirations in Africa: the Maritime and Colonial League in Angola and Liberia, c. 1920–1939’ (D.Phil. thesis, University of Kent, 2019), pp. 89–95.

20 Kazimierz Głuchowski, ‘Akcja kolonialna LMiR’, Morze, 12 (1928), pp. 27–9.

21 This approach changed only after 1934 when Germany started to question Poland's right to access to the Baltic Sea. Borkowska, Grażyna, ‘Polish colonial experience’, Teksty Drugie, 4 (2007), pp. 17–20Google Scholar.

22 Radzikowski, Leon, ‘Eur – Afryka’, Morze, 4 (1931), pp. 22–4Google Scholar.

23 Mower, J. H., ‘The Republic of Liberia’, Journal of Negro History, 32 (1947), p. 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Allan Yarema, The American Colonization Society: an avenue to freedom? (Lanham, MD, 2006), p. 15. Eric Burin divides the interpretations of the ACS's motives offered by historians studying the subject into two categories: those that criticize the ACS as a pro-slavery organization (e.g. Amos J. Beyan, Antonio McDaniel, Lamin Sanneh) and those that portray it as part of the anti-slavery movement, emphasizing the humanitarian motives of its members and supporters (e.g. William Freehling, Peter S. Onuf, Douglas R. Egerton). Burin places his interpretation in the latter. Eric Burin, Slavery and the peculiar solution: a history of the American Colonization Society (Gainesville, FL, 2008), p. 2.

25 For a critique of the ‘settler–native’ dichotomy, see Woods, Tryon P., ‘Marronage, here and there: Liberia, enslavement's conversion, and the settler-not’, International Labor and Working-Class History, 96 (2019), pp. 38–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 William E. Allen pointed out that the Africans repatriated to Liberia originated from different parts of Africa. Allen, William E., ‘Liberia and the Atlantic world in the nineteenth century: convergence and effects’, History in Africa, 37 (2010), pp. 23–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Bøås, Morten, ‘Liberia and Sierra Leone: dead ringers? The logic of neopatrimonial rule’, Third World Quarterly, 22 (2001), p. 702CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Buell, Raymond L., ‘The Liberian paradox’, Virginia Quarterly Review, 7 (1931), p. 16Google Scholar7.

29 Akpan, M. B., ‘Black imperialism: Americo-Liberian rule over the African peoples of Liberia, 1841–1964’, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines, 7 (1973), pp. 219, 225Google Scholar.

30 McCoskey, Suzanne Kathleen, ‘Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurial capture in pre-conflict Liberia’, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 24 (2011), p. 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Woods, ‘Marronage, here and there’, p. 53.

32 Akpan, ‘Black imperialism’, p. 229. The indirect rule was a system of governance under which an imperial power made use of the indigenous political institutions of a conquered territory for its administration. For the indirect rule in Africa, see Mahmood Mamdani, Citizen and subject: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism (Princeton, NJ, 2018).

33 Akingbade, Harrison, ‘The pacification of the Liberian hinterland’, Journal of Negro History, 79 (1994), pp. 278–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Stanley, William R., ‘Background to the Liberia and Sierra Leone implosions’, GeoJournal, 61 (2005), p. 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 De Lynden, R. A., ‘Liberia’, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 58 (1942), p. 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 F. Sherman, Liberia: the land, its people, history and culture (Dar es Salaam, 2011), pp. 52–7.

37 Wesley, Charles, ‘Liberia begins its second century’, Negro History Bulletin, 12 (1948), p. 56Google Scholar.

38 Leigh A. Gardner, ‘The rise and fall of sterling in Liberia, 1847–1943’, Economic History Review, Special Issue: The Renaissance of African Economic History, 67 (2014), p. 1100.

39 McCoskey, ‘Foreign direct investment’, p. 199.

40 Patton, Adell Jr, ‘Civil rights in America's African diaspora: Firestone rubber and segregation in Liberia’, Canadian Journal of African Studies / La Revue Canadienne des Etudes Africaines, 49 (2015), p. 322Google Scholar.

41 Mower, ‘The Republic of Liberia’, p. 282.

42 McCoskey, ‘Foreign direct investment’, p. 199.

43 Wesley, ‘Liberia begins its second century’, p. 57.

44 Akpan, M. B., ‘Liberia and the Universal Negro Improvement Association: the background to the abortion of Garvey's Scheme for African Colonization’, Journal of African History, 14 (1973), p. 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Sundiata, I. K., ‘Liberia and Fernando Po, 1880–1930’, Journal of African History, 15 (1974), pp. 98–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 110.

46 Akpan, ‘Black imperialism’, p. 234.

47 Mower, ‘The Republic of Liberia’, pp. 291–2.

48 Mackenzie, M. D., ‘Liberia and the League of Nations’, Journal of the Royal African Society, 33 (1934), pp. 375–6Google Scholar.

49 Davis, Ronald W., ‘The Liberian struggle for authority on the Kru Coast’, International Journal of African Historical Studies, 8 (1975), pp. 248–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Mower, ‘Republic of Liberia’, p. 292.

51 Ibid.

52 Boyd Shannon, 9 Jan. 1933, The National Archives (TNA), DO 35 167/6, pp. 1–8.

53 Ibid.

54 Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Liberia (1934): No. 1. Papers concerning affairs in Liberia, December 1930 – May 1934 (Cmd 4614, 1934), pp. 45–6.

55 Cordell Hull to F. D. G. Osbourne, 21 July 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 102–3. McBride stayed in Liberia from 19 August to 4 September 1934. Yapp, 4 Sept. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 223–8.

56 Yapp to Peterson, 26 June 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 77.

57 Wallinger, 7 Aug. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 97–8.

58 Mower, ‘The Republic of Liberia’, p. 295.

59 Copy of the agreement (not dated), Archiwum Akt Nowych (AAN), Konsulat RP w Monrowii 5, pp. 10–18.

60 Perhaps this is what Makarczyk was told by his Liberian counterparts, but European trading outposts existed in the coastal area. Liebenov points out that the elite tended to discourage Liberian business and encouraged the entrance of foreign groups at various levels of economic enterprise. Gus J. Liebenow, Liberia: the evolution of privilege (New York, NY, 1969), p. 92. Alternatively, this restriction mentioned by Makarczyk could apply only to the Liberian hinterland. Polish nationals had the right to enter the Liberian interior without a permit, which was required from other Europeans. Jan Hirschler, Ze Lwowa do Liberii: Wspomnienia z Afryki tropikalnej (Lwów, 1938), p. 99.

61 Janusz Makarczyk, Widziałem i słyszałem: Wspomnienia podróżnicze (Warsaw, 1957), pp. 72–3.

62 Białas, Liga Morska, pp. 212–13.

63 Hirschler, Ze Lwowa do Liberii, pp. 86–7.

64 Białas, Liga Morska, pp. 211–12.

65 Makarczyk, Widziałem i słyszałem, pp. 77–9.

66 Ibid.

67 Kotti Sree Ramesh and Kandula Nirupa Rani, Claude McKay: the literary identity from Jamaica to Harlem and beyond (Jefferson, NC, 2006), p. 190.

68 Makarczyk, Widziałem i słyszałem, p. 71. According to the report published by the Maritime and Colonial League, Sajous initially arrived to Poland in 1933 as an unofficial representative of Liberia, Haiti, and Abisynia to establish direct cultural and economic relations between these countries and Poland. Sprawozdanie z działalności Ligi Morskiej i Kolonialnej 1.IV.1933 – 1.IV.1935 (Warsaw, 1935), p. 21. It remains unclear how exactly Sajous came in contact with the Maritime and Colonial League.

69 Record of the conversation between McBride, Millard of the US Embassy in London, Thompson, and Wallinger, 18 Sept. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 244–51.

70 Letter nominating Leo Sajous as Liberian consul general signed by Simpson, 23 Apr. 1934, AAN, MSZ, 642, p. 11. The exequatur was granted to Sajous on 20 Mar. 1935. Beck, 20 Mar. 1935, AAN, MSZ, 642, p. 6.

71 ‘Umowa kolonizacyjna między Polską a Liberią’, Ilustrowany Kuryer Codzienny, 330 (1934), p. 6. Descendants of Polish legionnaires who rebelled against Napoleon to support the anti-colonial uprising in Haiti were still living there. See Jan Pachoński and Reuel K. Wilson, Poland's Caribbean tragedy: a study of Polish legions in the Haitian War of Independence, 1802–1803 (Boulder, CO, 1986).

72 Ibid. Ilustrowany Kuryer Codzienny gave Michał Pankiewicz from the Maritime and Colonial League as a source.

73 W. Erskine to Simon, 4 Dec. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18043, pp. 154–7.

74 Ibid.

75 Białas, Liga Morska, p. 211.

76 Yapp, 4 Aug. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 136.

77 Juliusz Łukasiewicz to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 28 Aug. 1934, AAN, Ambassada RP w Paryżu, 123, pp. 13–14.

78 Fularski, 31 Aug. 1934, AAN, Ambassada RP w Paryżu, 123, pp. 15–17.

79 Ibid.

80 Yapp, 3 Sept. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 209–12.

81 Yapp, 22 Oct. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18043, pp. 12–15. Simpson also mentioned some rumours apparently circulating in Monrovia that the delegation meant to secure a loan from Poland. He stated that these rumours were not true.

82 Yapp, 10 Nov. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18043, pp. 49–78.

83 Mower, ‘The Republic of Liberia’, p. 295.

84 Yapp, 4 Sept. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 223–8.

85 Yapp to John Simon, 6 Aug. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 144–5.

86 Wallinger, 22 Aug. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 155.

87 Wallinger, 22 Oct. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 311.

88 A former vice-governor of the Congo was proposed, but he did not accept the Liberian government's invitation as he thought that the preset conditions in that country gave scant hope of a successful outcome to any mission he might undertake. Baron de Cartier de Marchienne to Seymour, 24 Sept. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 260–2.

89 Copy of Lugard's letter to Orts enclosed in Lugard's letter to Simon, 30 Aug. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 161–3.

90 Ibid.

91 Yapp, 21 Aug. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 200–3.

92 Ibid.

93 Ibid.

94 Yapp to Thompson, 12 Nov. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18043, pp. 87–90. In comparison, in 1932, the annual salary received by the Liberian secretary of the treasury was 3,137.98 US dollars. The Department of State, Liberia: documents relating to the plan of assistance proposed by the League of Nations (Washington, DC, 1933), pp. 51–2.

95 Annual report on Liberia for the period January 1934 to May 1935, Yapp, 15 May 1935, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/19235, p. 352.

96 Revision of the annual report upon leading personalities in Liberia, Yapp, 20 Feb. 1935, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/19235, pp. 247, 2.

97 Yapp, Monrovia, 22 Oct. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18043, pp. 12–15. The health conditions in 1929, when yellow fever made its appearance, were described as distressing. For many years, there were areas in Liberia where health conditions were in such a deplorable state in 1932 that it started to be considered a serious danger on the west coast of Africa. See Browne, Vincent J., ‘Economic development in Liberia’, Journal of Negro Education, 24 (1955), pp. 113–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 TNA, FO 371/19235, p. 352.

99 Yapp to Pink, 23 Apr. 1935, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/19233, pp. 193–7.

100 Transcript of the annual message of President Barclay to the legislature from 19 Dec. 1935, Yapp, 4 Jan. 1936, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/20213, pp. 77–101, 96.

101 Pink, 26 Nov. 1936, TNA, FO 371/20213, p. 8.

102 Transcript of President Barclay's annual message to the legislature given on 28 Oct. 1936, Yapp, 6 Nov. 1936, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/20213, pp. 12–33, 21.

103 Wallinger to Ashley Clark, 19 Sept. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, pp. 252–3.

104 Yapp, 22 Oct. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18043, pp. 12–15.

105 Erskine to Foreign Office, 15 Oct. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 311.

106 Wallinger, 17 Sept. 1934, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 204.

107 Yapp, 29 Jan. 1935, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/19235, pp. 228–9.

108 Whittall, 6 June 1935, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/19233, pp. 273–6.

109 Yapp, 17 Sept. 1934, Monrovia, TNA, FO 371/18042, p. 290.

110 Wesley, ‘Liberia begins its second century’, p. 63.

111 Mower, ‘The Republic of Liberia’, p. 295.

112 A note regarding the Maritime and Colonial League presence in Liberia (not dated), AAN, Konsulat RP w Monrowii 5, pp. 19–21.

113 Hirschler, Ze Lwowa do Liberii, pp. 13–14.

114 AAN, Konsulat RP w Monrowii 5, pp. 19–21.

115 Hirschler, Ze Lwowa do Liberii, p. 223.

116 ‘Do Afryki Zachodniej’, Morze, 2 (1935), p. 16.

117 Pankiewicz, Michał, ‘Nasza wyprawa do Afryki’, Morze, 4 (1935), pp. 6–7Google Scholar.

118 TNA, FO 371/19233, pp. 273–6.

119 Łukasiewicz to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 13 Oct. 1936, AAN, MSZ, 7011, pp. 1–2.

120 Mańkowski to Polish consulate in Marseille, 27 July 1938, AAN, MSZ, 4464, pp. 1–3.

121 Mańkowski to Polish consulate in Marseille, 18 Aug. 1938, AAN, MSZ, 4464, p. 6.

122 Mańkowski to Polish consulate in Marseille, 17 Jan. 1939, AAN, Konsulat w Monrowii 5, pp. 8–9.

123 Mańkowski to Polish consulate in Marseille, 27 July 1938, AAN, MSZ, 4464, pp. 1–3.

124 Kwaśniewski to Międzynarowe Towarzystwo Osadnicze, 25 May 1939, AAN, MSZ, 9765, pp. 17–18.

125 See Cooper, Frederick, ‘Possibility and constraint: African independence in historical perspective’, Journal of African History, 49 (2008), pp. 167–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.