Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:27:22.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIBERALISM, LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM, AND POLITICAL EDUCATION IN GREAT BRITAIN AND BRITISH INDIA, 1880–1886

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2017

BENJAMIN WEINSTEIN
BENJAMIN WEINSTEIN*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
University of Edinburgh, School of History, Classic and Archaeology, William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, eh8 9ag[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article attempts to shed new light on the character of late Victorian Liberalism by investigating its political priorities in British India. It takes as its particular focus the debates which raged between 1881 and 1883 over the Government of India Resolution on Local Self-Government. Along with the Ilbert Bill, the Resolution comprised the centrepiece of the marquis of Ripon's self-consciously Liberal programme for dismantling Lytton's Raj. When analysed in conjunction with contemporaneous Liberal discourse on English local government reform, the debates surrounding the Resolution help to clarify many of the central principles of late Victorian Liberalism. In particular, these debates emphasize the profound importance of local government reform to what one might call the Liberal project. Beyond its utility in effecting retrenchment, efficiency, and ‘sound finance’, local government reform was valued by Liberals as the best and safest means of effecting ‘political education’ among populations, in both Britain and India, with increasingly strong claims to inclusion within the body politic.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 181 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in Cohen, E. A. Whaley, A young Victorian in India (London, 1957), p. 173Google Scholar.

2 Seal, Anil, The emergence of Indian nationalism: competition and collaboration in the later nineteenth century (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 151–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Marquis of Ripon to W. E. Forster, 26 May 1881, Ripon papers, British Library (BL) Add. MS 43596, fo. 56.

4 Gopal, Sarvepalli, British policy in India, 1858–1905 (Cambridge, 1965), p. 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Thompson, James, British political culture and the idea of ‘public opinion’, 1867–1914 (Cambridge, 2013), pp. 85–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Gladstone's view, see Gladstone, W. E., ‘The platform, its rise and progress’, Nineteenth Century, 31 (1892), pp. 686–9Google Scholar. Elaine Hadley has given a wider-ranging account of this process of acculturation in her Living liberalism: practical citizenship in mid-Victorian Britain (Chicago, IL, 2010)Google Scholar.

6 Chamberlain, Joseph, The radical programme (London, 1885), p. 235Google Scholar.

7 Ripon to Mountstuart Elphinstone Grant-Duff, 18 July 1882, Grant-Duff papers, BL MSS.EUR.F.234/60, fo. 36.

8 Gopal dismissively characterizes the Resolution as a ‘reform to conserve measure’ aimed merely at pacifying the babus. See Gopal, Sarvepalli, The viceroyalty of Lord Ripon, 1880–1884 (Oxford, 1953), pp. 83–4Google Scholar.

9 Metcalf, Thomas, Ideologies of the Raj (Cambridge, 1994), p. 201Google Scholar.

10 Haynes, Douglas, Rhetoric and ritual in colonial India: the shaping of a public culture in Surat city, 1852–1928 (Berkeley, CA, 1991), pp. 97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Palmowski, Jan, ‘Liberalism and local government in late nineteenth-century Germany and England’, Historical Journal, 45 (2002), p. 387Google Scholar.

12 In H. J. Hanham's view, local self-government had become ‘part of the orthodox Liberal creed’ by the 1850s. Hanham, H. J., The nineteenth-century constitution, 1815–1914 (Cambridge, 1969), p. 371Google Scholar.

13 See Biagini, Eugenio, Liberty, retrenchment, and reform: popular liberalism in the age of Gladstone, 1860–1880 (Cambridge, 1992), p. 1Google Scholar.

14 For the Local Government Board, see Bellamy, Christine, Administering central–local relations, 1871–1919: the Local Government Board in its fiscal and cultural context (Manchester, 1988)Google Scholar; Waller, P. J., Town, city, and nation: England, 1850–1914 (Oxford, 1983), pp. 300–5Google Scholar.

15 Quoted in Waller, P. J., Democracy and sectarianism: a political and social history of Liverpool, 1868–1939 (Liverpool, 1981), p. 83Google Scholar.

16 Biagini, Eugenio, ‘Popular liberals, Gladstonian finance, and the debate on taxation, 1860–1874’, in Biagini, Eugenio and Reid, Alastair, eds., Currents of radicalism: popular radicalism, organized labour and party politics in Britain, 1850–1914 (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 154–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Parry, Jonathan, The rise and fall of Liberal government in Victorian Britain (New Haven, CT, 1993), p. 241Google Scholar. D. A. Hamer similarly emphasizes the importance of local government reform as an ‘umbrella’ issue aimed at maintaining Liberal cohesion during the 1880s. See Hamer, D. A., Liberal politics in the age of Gladstone and Rosebury: a study in leadership and policy (Oxford, 1972), pp. 98, 101–2Google Scholar.

18 Wallace, Christopher, ‘The Liberals and Afghanistan, 1878–1880’, Historical Research, 85 (2012), pp. 306–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parry, J. P., The politics of patriotism: English liberalism, national identity and Europe, 1830–1886 (Cambridge, 2006), pp. 323–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Dilke, Charles, The eastern question (London, 1878)Google Scholar.

19 Lowe, Robert, ‘Imperialism’, Fortnightly Review, 24 (1878), pp. 453–65Google Scholar.

20 See especially Gladstone, William Ewart, ‘England's mission’, Nineteenth Century, 4 (1878), pp. 560–84Google Scholar.

21 Gladstone called it the ‘great undoing process’ of all that ‘the late Government bequeathed us’. Gladstone to Ripon, 13 Mar. 1882, Ripon papers, BL Add. MS 43552, fo. 43.

22 Given its political significance, the 1882 Resolution should be understood as the centrepiece of Ripon's wider reform programme. For the Ilbert Bill, see Sinha, Mrinalini, Colonial masculinity: the manly Englishman and the effeminate Bengali (Manchester, 1995), pp. 33–68Google Scholar, and Hirschmann, Edwin, White mutiny: the Ilbert Bill crisis in India and the genesis of the Indian National Congress (Columbia, MO, 1980)Google Scholar. For the repeal of the Vernacular Press Act, see Narain, Prem, ‘The ethos of the Indian language press after the repeal of the Vernacular Press Act’, Quarterly Review of Historical Studies, 15 (1975), pp. 77–89Google Scholar.

23 Baring, Evelyn, ‘Recent events in India’, Nineteenth Century, 14 (1883), pp. 579–80Google Scholar.

24 ‘Resolution of the Government of India’ (Department of Finance and Commerce), no. 3353, 30 Sept. 1881, Parliamentary Papers (PP), li (1883), pp. 8–13.

25 ‘Resolution of the Government of India’, 18 May 1882, PP, li, pp. 25–32.

26 ‘H. M. Kisch, Esq., officiating secretary to the Government of Bengal, to the secretary to the Government of India’, 12 July 1881, PP, li, pp. 148–9.

27 From 1876, two-thirds of the members of the Calcutta Corporation were non-officials. For the Calcutta Corporation, see Furedy, Chris, ‘New men and political clubs in Calcutta in the 1870s and 1880s: a colonial mix of ideology and self-interest’, Indian Journal of Politics, 13 (1979), pp. 63–73Google Scholar.

28 ‘Memorandum showing the changes that have occurred since 1881 as to local self-government (Madras)’, Grant-Duff papers, BL MSS.F.234/80. See also ‘Committee on local self-government [Madras] to the chief secretary to the government’, 16 Oct. 1882, PP, li, pp. 131–3.

29 ‘W. M. Young, Esq., secretary to the Government of Panjab, to the secretary to the Government of India’, 7 Sept. 1882, PP, li, p. 104.

30 ‘Solution of the Government of the Northwestern Provinces and Oudh’, PP, li, pp. 171–2.

31 ‘Resolution of the chief commissioner of Assam’, 2 Nov. 1882, PP, li, pp. 254–6.

32 ‘Memorandum’, Grant-Duff papers, BL MSS.F.234/80.

33 ‘Colman Macaulay, Esq., officiating secretary to the Government of Bengal, to the secretary to the Government of India’, 8 Apr. 1882, PP, li, p. 75.

34 Chopra, P. N., ‘Genesis and growth of the Indian National Congress’, Journal of Indian History, 50 (1972), pp. 389–414Google Scholar; Seal, The emergence of Indian nationalism.

35 ‘Resolution of the Government of India’, p. 27.

36 ‘Viceroy's minute on local self-government in India, 10 Nov. 1884’, Ripon papers, BL Add. MSS 43639, fo. 82. See also Ripon to Forster, 26 Mar. 1883, Ripon papers, BL Add. MS 43597, fo. 36.

37 ‘Draft letter from the marquis of Hartington’ and ‘Council letter to sec. of state for India 23 May, 1882’, BL India Office Records L/PJ/6/67, file 1027.

38 Yajnik, Javerilal Umiashankar, Note on local self-government in the Bombay Presidency (Bombay, 1882), p. 4Google Scholar, emphasis in the original.

39 Robinson, George Frederick Samuel, Speeches of the marquis of Ripon, viceroy and general-governor of India, 1883–1884 (Calcutta, 1884), p. 235Google Scholar.

40 Gupta, Amit Kuar, Between a Tory and a Liberal: Bombay under Sir James Fergusson, 1880–1885 (Bombay, 1978), pp. 2–3Google Scholar.

41 Sir James Fergusson to Ripon, 31 May 1882, Fergusson papers, BL MSS.EUR.E.214/7, fos. 269–79.

42 ‘Resolution of the Government of Bombay’, 19 Sept. 1882, PP, li, p. 41.

43 Ibid., p. 50.

44 Ibid., pp. 42–3.

45 Ripon to Fergusson, 30 Dec. 1882, Fergusson papers, BL MSS.EUR.E.214/6, fo. 201.

46 Ripon to Grant-Duff, 4 Oct. 1882, Sir Mountstuart Elphinstone Grant-Duff papers, BL MSS.EUR.F.234/60, fos. 48–9.

47 Grant Duff to Ripon, 23 June 1882, Sir Mountstuart Elphinstone Grant-Duff papers, BL MSS.EUR.F.234/59, fos. 18–19.

48 Indian Spectator, 25 May 1882.

49 See, for instance, Baring's essay ‘Recent events in India’, which credits Mayo for initiating the reforms now associated with Ripon. Nineteenth Century, 14 (1883), p. 579Google Scholar.

50 Goldsmid, Julian, ‘Questions of the day in India’, Nineteenth Century, 13 (1883), p. 741Google Scholar. For a further disavowal of the Resolution's political character, see The Friend of India and Statesman, 12 Dec. 1882: ‘those who think it the offspring of mere Liberal sentiment entirely mistake its origin and character…the truth is, it is idle to describe or account for it by the use of terms belonging to English party politics, or by reference to the doctrines of any English party’.

51 Fergusson to Ripon, 3 Jan. 1883, Sir James Fergusson papers, BL MSS.EUR.E.214/8, fo. 1.

52 Hansard, 9 Apr. 1883, cols. 1799–800.

53 The Englishman, 22 May 1882.

54 Hansard, 9 Apr. 1883, col. 1743.

55 Ibid., col. 1746.

56 Ibid., col. 1747.

57 Fergusson to Ripon, 3 Jan. 1883, Fergusson papers, BL MSS.F.234/80, fos. 4–5.

58 ‘Minute by the lieutenant-governor of the North Western Provinces and chief commissioner of Oudh’, 22 Aug. 1882, PP, li, p. 220.

59 Munro, James, Local self-government and the elective system for Bengal (Calcutta, 1883), pp. 9–10Google Scholar.

60 Munro, Local self-government, p. 10.

61 ‘H. M. Kisch, Esq., officiating secretary to the Government of Bengal, to the secretary of the Government of India’, 12 July 1881, PP, li, p. 149.

62 ‘G. H. Sheppard, Esq., commissioner, N. D. to John Nugent, Esq., secretary to the government, Financial Department, Bombay’, 3 Dec. 1881, PP, li, Part ii (Appendix), p. 1.

63 ‘Memorandum’, 9 Dec. 1881, PP, li, Part ii (Appendix), p. 10.

64 ‘Remarks and suggestions of Mr. Todd, assistant collector of Kanara’, 14 Mar. 1882, PP, li, Part ii (Appendix), p. 23.

65 ‘W. Woodward, Esq., collector, Panch Mahals, to the secretary of government, General Department’, 21 June 1882, PP, li, Part ii (Appendix), p. 37.

66 ‘Memorandum on the subject of extension of powers to local bodies discussed in the correspondence ending government resolution’ (Financial Department), no. 3950, 25 Oct. 1881, PP, li, Part ii (Appendix), p. 33.

67 A. P. W., Local self-government (Meerut, 1882), p. 8Google Scholar.

68 ‘J. King, Esquire, collector of Ahmednagar, to E. P. Robertson, Esquire, commissioner, central division’, 23 Dec. 1881, PP, li, part ii (appendix), p. 32.

69 Yajnik, Note on local self-government, p. 8.

70 Madras Native Association, Proceedings of the Madras Native Association on the resolution of the Government of India on local self-government (Madras, 1883), p. 187Google Scholar.

71 ‘Local self-government in the Punjab’, PP, LI, p. 101.

72 Alfred Lyall to Ripon, 2 Nov., 1882, Ripon papers, BL Add. MS 43605, fo. 141

73 Sina, Local self-government (Bombay, 1882), pp. 7, 16Google Scholar.

74 Allan Octravian Hume to Ripon, 30 Dec. 1882, Ripon papers, BL Add. MS 43616, fos. 12–19; ‘Appendix: A. O. Hume on local self-government in India’, in Yajnik, Note on local self-government.

75 ‘Resolution of the Government of Bombay’, PP, li, p. 40.

76 BL India Office Records L/PJ/6/67, file 1027.

77 ‘A. Mackenzie, Esq., secretary to the Government of India, to the secretary to the Government of Bombay’, 4 Oct. 1882, PP, li, pp. 71–2.

78 Ibid., pp. 2–3.

79 Smith, Joshua Toulmin, Local self-government and centralisation (London, 1851), p. 44Google Scholar, my emphasis. For a wider discussion of Toulmin Smith's analysis of the character building capacity of local self-government, see Weinstein, Benjamin, ‘Local self-government is true socialism: Joshua Toulmin Smith, the state, and character formation’, English Historical Review, 123 (2008), pp. 1193–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Mill, John Stuart, Considerations on representative government (London, 1861), p. 276Google Scholar.

81 Incidence of the use of the phrase ‘political education’ in parliamentary debates: 1850s (5); 1860s (19); 1870s (24); 1880s (27); 1890s (14). Incidence of the phrase ‘political education’ appearing in the Gale News Vault newspapers: 1850s (385); 1860s (915); 1870s (1404); 1880s (3,120); 1890s (1,760). For The Times alone: 1850s (42); 1860s (91); 1870s (143); 1880s (198); 1890s (146). Moreover, this data is only minimally skewed by reporting on Ripon's Resolution. When ‘India’ is used as a ‘not’ search term, the Gale results remain broadly similar to when only ‘political education’ is used as a search term. Results are: 1850s (301); 1860s (733); 1870s (1,108); 1880s (2,479); 1890s (1,535). For The Times alone: 1850s (36); 1860s (74); 1870s (122); 1880s (149); 1890s (125).

82 Hansard, 7 June 1888, col. 1455.

83 Times, 14 Jan. 1885, 15 Jan. 1885, 15 June 1885, 7 Oct. 1885.

84 Northampton Mercury, 15 Jan. 1881.

85 Broderick, George C., ‘Local government in England’, in Probyn, J. W., ed., Local government and taxation in the United Kingdom (London, 1882), p. 87Google Scholar. C. T. D. Acland's call to reform county boards into ‘instruments of political education’ for agricultural labourers appeared in the same collection. See T. C. D. Acland, ‘County boards’, in Probyn, ed., Local government and taxation, p. 90.

86 Whale, George, A fragment on political education (London, 1882), p. 51Google Scholar.

87 ‘Local self-government and political education’, Westminster Review, 125 (1886), esp. pp. 355–8, 365Google Scholar.

88 Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science, and Art, 61 (19 June 1886), p. 837Google Scholar.

89 Hennock, E. P., ‘Finance and politics in urban local government, 1835–1900’, Historical Journal, 6 (1963), pp. 212–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Doyle, Barry, ‘The changing functions of urban government: councillors, officials, and pressure groups’, in Daunton, Martin, ed., The Cambridge urban history of Britain, iii: 1840–1950 (Cambridge, 2000), pp. 298–9Google Scholar.

90 Keith-Lucas, Bryan, The English local government franchise: a short history (Oxford, 1952), pp. 68–9, 71Google Scholar.

91 ‘Report of the Select Committee of the House of Lords on the operation of the small tenements rating act 1850’, PP, vii (1859), Appendix, col. 99.

92 Fraser, Derek, Urban politics in Victorian England: the structure of politics in Victorian cities (Leicester, 1976), pp. 129–33Google Scholar.

93 Hennock, E. P., Fit and proper persons: ideal and reality in nineteenth-century urban government (Montreal, 1973), pp. 312–14Google Scholar.

94 Collini, Stefan, Public moralists: political thought and intellectual life in Britain, 1850–1930 (Oxford, 1991), pp. 109–13, esp. p. 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Collini, Stefan, ‘Political theory and the “science of society” in Victorian Britain’, Historical Journal, 23 (1980), pp. 203–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 In parliament, the rhetoric of ‘political education’ often popped up in debates over Irish Home Rule and the extension of the parliamentary franchise. See, for instance, Robert Hanbury's contribution to the second reading of the Home Rule Bill, in which he warns against the impossibility of instilling ‘at once into the minds of the people of Ireland the political qualities and capacities necessary for self-government, when they had not given them the means and the opportunities for political education’. Hansard, 18 May 1886, col. 1358. Of course, Irish Home Rule could itself be conceptualized as a ‘local government’ reform. For the use of ‘political education’ in franchise debates, see Hansard, 26 May, 1884, cols. 1351–2; Hansard, 4 Dec. 1884, cols. 711–22.

96 Chalmers, M. D., Local government (London, 1883), p. 12Google Scholar.