Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:18:05.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Great Britain and Greater Greece 1917–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Erik Goldstein
Erik Goldstein
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The First World War saw the collapse of the old order in the Eastern Mediterranean with the disintegration of the Ottoman empire, an event which threatened to create a dangerous power vacuum. Great Britain for the pastcentury had attempted to prevent just such a crisis by supporting the maintenance of the territorial integrity of the Ottoman state. Britain had a number of crucial strategic concerns in the Eastern Mediterranean, in particular the Suez Canal and the Straits. The former was the more critical interest and Britain was determined to keep this essential link to its Indian empire firmly under its own control. As to the Straits Britain, which was concerned about over-extending its strategic capabilities, was content to see this critical waterway dominated by a friendly state. The question inevitably arose therefore as to what would replace the Ottoman empire. One alternative was Greece, a possibility which became increasingly attractive with the emergence of the supposedly pro-British Eleftherios Venizelos as the Greek leader in early 1917.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 339 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 P.R.O., CAB 29/1/0.–2. ‘Negotiations at the end of the war’, 31 August 1916.

2 See Goldstein, Erik ‘Britain prepares for peace: British preparations for the Paris peace conference, 1916–1919’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1984, pp. 66–IIIGoogle Scholar.

3 P.R.O., FO 371/3476/52636.

4 P.R.O., FO 371/4352/f18/PC 20.

5 Sir Ralph Paget (1864–1940). Educated Eton; entered diplomatic service, 1888; served at Constantinople, 1901; minister at Belgrade, 1910–13; assistant under-secretary for foreign affairs, 1913–16.

6 Sir Louis Mallet (1864–1936). Entered Foreign Office, 1888; private secretary to Sir Edward Grey, 1905–7; assistant under-secretary for foreign affairs, 1907–13; ambassador to Turkey, 1913–14.

7 Seton-Watson, Hugh and Seton-Watson, Christopher, The making of a new Europe (London, 1981)Google Scholar.

8 Nicolson, Harold, ‘Allen Leeper’, The nineteenth century and after (10 1935). pp. 473–83Google Scholar.

9 Nicolson, Harold, Peacemaking 1919 (London, 1933), p. 105Google Scholar.

10 Seton-Watson and Seton-Watson, p. 306 n. 37.

11 Nicolson, Harold, Peacemaking 1919, p. 35Google Scholar.

12 A list of Toynbee's wartime writings is in FO 371/4366/f263/PID 263. On Toynbee's later troubled relations with Greece see Clogg, Richard, Politics and the Academy: Arnold Toynbee and the Koraes chair (London, 1986)Google Scholar.

13 On Crowe's career see Butler, Rohan, ‘Sir Eyre Crowe’, World Review, N.S. 50 (04–05 1953) 8–13Google Scholar.

14 P.R.O., FO 371/4355/f68/PC 68.

15 P.R.O., FO 371/4356/f162/PC 162, Confidential Print 11908*, and FO 371/4354/f36/PC 94.

16 Confidential Print 1908*. Toynbee, , ‘Peace settlement for Turkey and Arabian peninsula’, 21 11 1918Google Scholar. Originally circulated with the title, ‘The British case in regard to settlement of Turkey and the Arabian peninsula’.

17 P.R.O., FO 371/4354/f36/PC 94. Toynbee, , ‘The future Turkish state’, 9 12 1918Google Scholar.

18 Bodl. Lib., Toynbee papers: Toynbee to Arthur Walworth, 5 July 1968.

19 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/4392. Minute by Nicolson to Crowe, 15 March 1919.

20 Nicolson, , Peacemaking 1919, p. 35Google Scholar.

21 P.R.O., FO 608/52/120/1/3/316. Minute by Crowe, 22 Jan. 1919.

22 P.R.O., CAB 27/24/EC 46. 23 Dec. 1918.

23 P.R.O., FO 608/52/120/1/3/538. Rev. George Macaulay to Balfour, 13 Jan. 1919.

24 The St Sophia Redemption Committee was established by the initiative of Rev. H. J. Fynes-Clinton, the geneal-secretary of the Anglican and Eastern Association. A preliminary meeting was held on 27 Dec. 1918 and the first formal meeting on 3 Jan. 1919. The committee was behind the publication of Douglas, j. A., The redemption of Saint Sophia (London, 1919)Google Scholar. Documents relating to the committee are to be found in: Archbishop R. T. Davidson papers, Lambeth Palace Library, London; Canon J. A. Douglas papers, Lambeth Palace Library; and E. S. Montagu papers, Trinity College, Cambridge.

25 P.R.O., FO 371/3147/f201892/201892. Granville to Balfour, 7 Dec. 1918.

26 P.R.O., FI 608/31/81/1/6/5135. Napier to Balfour, 18 March 1918.

27 Ibid. Minute by Leeper, 25 March 1919.

28 P.R.O., FO 608/32/81/1/9/9693. Minute by Crowe, May 1919.

29 P.R.O., FO 608/46/108/1/1/10041. Minute by Crowe, 17 May 1919. Spencer's letter is dated 23 April.

30 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/2350. Minutes of 1st meeting of Greek Territorial Committee, 12 Feb. 1919.

31 Politis to Alexander Diomidis, 29 Jan. 1919. Cited in Petsalis-Diomidis, N., Greece at the Paris peace conference, 1919 (Thessaloniki, 1978), p. 135Google Scholar.

32 An example of Bratianu's diplomacy is provided by his opening statement on the second occasion that he appeared before the Supreme Council, on 1 February when he observed that this was the second time he had faced a ‘viva’ examination in Paris, the first being when he took his engineering degree, adding the observation that ‘On that occasion my examiners knew more than I did’. Quoted in Nicolson, , Peacemaking 1919, p. 254Google Scholar (who wrongly gives the degree as being in law).

33 A. W. Leeper to R. W. A. Leeper, 3 Feb. 1919. (A. W. A. Leeper papers, unlisted) Cited by courtesy of Mrs Katharine Cobbett.

34 A. W. A. Leeper to R. W. A. Leeper, 19 May 1919.

35 P.R.O., FO 371/4355/f68/PC 68.

36 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/4392. Minute by Nicolson to Crowe, 15 March 1919.

37 P.R.O., FO 371/4355/f68/PC 68.

38 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/19. Venizelos, , ‘Greece before the peace congress’, 30 12 1918Google Scholar.

39 Ibid. Minute by Nicolson, 15 Jan. 1919.

40 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/775. Nicolson, , ‘Summary of memorial presented to peace conference by M.Venizelo’, 28 06 1919Google Scholar.

41 Ibid.

42 Ibid.

43 Ibid.

44 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/1575. Maj GenThwaites, , ‘Memorandum on Greek claims by general staff’, 7 02 1919Google Scholar.

45 Ibid.

46 Ibid.

47 Ibid.

48 Ibid. Minute by Nicolson, 7 Feb 1919.

49 The minutes of the committee are in P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/1901, 2350, 2948, 2851, 3145, 3673, 3662, 3526, 3983, 4117, 4212, 6268.

50 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/4117. Minutes of 10th meeting of Greek Territorial Committee, 4 March 1919.

51 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/3931. ‘Report of committee on Greek territorial claims’, 6 March 1919.

52 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/4392.

53 Barnes had travelled extensively in Albania.

54 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/4392 and FO 608/46/108/1/1/5605. Minute by Nicolson, , ‘Settlement of South Eastern Europe’, 27 03 1919Google Scholar.

55 P.R.O., FO 608/29/76/2/3/8333. MajBarnes, ‘Proposed settlement of Albania’, 04 1919Google Scholar.

56 Ibid.Minute by Nicolson, 25 April 1919.

57 Ibid.Minute by Temperley, 28 April 1919.

58 P.R.O., FO 608/46/108/1/1/8332. Sidney Mezes to Nicolson, 21 April 1919.

59 P.R.O., FO 608/29/76/2/3/11124. Nicolson, , ‘Albania’, 28 05 1919Google Scholar .

60 P.R.O., ibid.

61 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/3145. Minutes of 4th meeting of the Greek Territorial Committee, 20 Feb. 1919.

62 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/4117. Minutes of 10th meeting of the Greek Territorial Committee, 11 March 1919 and FO 608/37/92/1/4/3931.

63 P.R.O., FO 608/55/120/6/1/15321.

64 Ibid.

65 Ibid. Minute by Crowe, 11 July 1919.

66 P.R.O., FO 608/55/120/6/1/15322. Minute by Crowe to Balfour, 16 July 1919.

67 Ibid. Minute by Nicolson, 15 July 1919.

68 Documents on British foreign policy, 1919–1939 (London, 1947), first series, Vol. IGoogle Scholar, 24, 1, 30, 2, 33, 3.

69 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/19.

70 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/4212. Minutes of 11th meeting of the Greek Territorial Committee, 6 March 1919.

71 Ibid.

72 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/3931.

73 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/4212. Minutes of the 11th meeting of the Greek Territorial Committee, 6 March 1919.

74 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/4392. Minute by Nicolson, 15 March 1919.

75 P.R.O., FO 608/88/357/1/1/2869. Minute by Mallet, 1 March 1919.

76 P.R.O., FO 608/103/383/1/1/3968.

77 Ibid. Minute by Crowe, 11 March 1919.

78 Ibid. Note by Thwaites, 20 March 1919.

79 P.R.O., FO 608/103/383/1/1/4795. ‘The economic importance of Smyrna to Anatolia’.

80 P.R.O., FO 371/4356/f192/PC 192. ‘Notes on Greek war aims’, 27 Dec. 1918.

81 P.R.O., FO 608/110/385/1/8/7335.

82 Dockrill, Michael L. and Gould, J. Douglas, Peace without promise: Britain and the peace conferences, 1919–23 (London, 1981), pp. 190–1Google Scholar.

83 Minutes of the Council of Four, 6 May 1919. Foreign relations of the United States: the Paris peace conference, 1919, Volume v.

84 Ibid.

85 Goldstein, Erik, ‘Adrift on the Bosporus: Woodrow Wilson, philhellenism and the partition of Turkey 1918–1920’, M.A. Thesis, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, 1980Google Scholar.

86 P.R.O., FO 608/104/383/1/6/11984. Minute by Armitage-Smith, 9 June 1919.

87 P.R.O., FO 608/104/383/1/6/14003. Minute by Forbes-Adam, 1 July 1918.

88 Documents on British foreign policy, 1919–1939 (London, 1962), first series, iv, 430Google Scholar .

89 The question of Constantinople has been extensively dealt with, the best short account being MacFie, A. L., ‘The British decision regarding the future of Constantinople, November 1918–January 1920’, Historical Journal, 18, 2 (1975), 391–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

90 Toynbee, Arnold J., The murderous tyranny of the Turks (London, 1917), p. 22Google Scholar.

91 A. W. A. Leeper to R. W. A. Leeper, 9 March 1919, in the unlisted A. W. A. Leeper papers.

92 P.R.O., CAB 27/24/EC46. Minutes of the Eastern Committee, 23 Dec. 1918.

93 P.R.O., FO 608/52/120/1/3/316. Minute by Crowe, 1 Jan. 1919.

94 P.R.O., CAB 27/39/EC2841. Note by Hirtzel, 20 Dec. 1918.

95 P.R.O., CAB 27/39/EC3027. Curzon, , ‘The future of Constantinople’, 2 06 1919Google Scholar. Also in CAB 29/2/P.–85.

96 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/1/775.

97 P.R.O., FO 608/37/92/1/4/3931.

98 P.R.O., FO 608/30/76/4/1/18645; P.R.O., FO 608/30/76/4/1/19159.

99 P.R.O., FO 608/34/85/3/1/13290. A useful file of correspondence on this matter is in the P. R. C. Groves papers, Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives, King's College, London.

100 P.R.O., FO 608/34/85/3/1/14667 and P.R.O., FO 608/34/85/3/1/16977.

101 Groves to Trenchard, 30 July 1919. Groves papers.

102 P.R.O., FO 608/54/120/3/12/17010. Memorandum by Crowe, 31 July 1919. The agreement is discussed in Petsalis-Diomidis, pp. 251–6.

103 Details are given in Barros, James, The Corfu incident (Princeton, 1966)Google Scholar.

104 Churchill, Winston, The Great War (London, 1934), III, 1559Google Scholar.

105 Documents on British foreign policy, 1919–1939 (London, 1962), first series, XII, 439Google Scholar.

106 Ibid. pp. 439, 488.

107 Ibid. p. 439.