Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:22:43.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Cardwellian Mysteries’1: The Fate of the British Army Regulation Bill, 1871

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Thomas F. Gallagher
Thomas F. Gallagher
Affiliation:
Xavier University, New Orleans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his volume in the Oxford History of England, R. C. K. Ensor gave us the first scholarly and dispassionate account of the reforms which Edward Cardwell made in the British army between 1868 and 1874. Ensor consciously followed Gladstone, who called Cardwell the greatest war secretary since die era of die Napoleonic wars. Ever since Ensor wrote, it has been impossible to do what Fortescue, the army's historian, did when he wrote whole chapters on the army after the Crimean War without once mentioning the name of Cardwell. Among more recent scholars diere has been a good deal of writing around the subject of the Cardwell reforms widiout actually attacking them head-on. We have a brief biography of Cardwell which quotes at some length from his correspondence, and we have a description of the purchase system in the army. There have been studies of a part of the background of the Cardwell era, and of die working-out of the reforms in the army of the 1870s and 1880s. Two recent works have been rather critical of the value of Cardwell's work.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 327 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Ensor, R. C. K., England, 1870–1914 (Oxford, 1936), p. 8.Google ScholarGladstone, W. E. to Cardwell, E. T., 21 Aug. 1871, Cardwell Papers, P[ublic] R[ecord] O[ffice] 30/48/2/9, fos. 67–8.Google Scholar

3 Fortescue, J. W., A History of the British Army (13 vols., London, 1899–1930), XIII, 166–71, 560, 571.Google Scholar

4 Erickson, Arvel B., ‘The abolition of purchase in the British army’, Military Affairs, XXIII (1959), 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Cardwell, Edward T.: Peelite, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, vol. XLIX (Philadelphia, 1959).Google Scholar

5 Bond, Brian, ‘Prelude to the Cardwell Reforms’, Journal of the Royal United Services Institution, CVI (1961), 229–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘The Effect of the Cardwell Reforms ’, Ibid. cv (1960), 515–24. The mechanics of the purchase system, and Cardwell's motives in doing away with it, are covered in detail in a recent thesis by Norton Moses, ‘Edward Cardwell's Abolition of the Purchase System in the British Army, 1868–1874: A Study in Administration and Legislative Processes’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1969. Although Moses misinterprets the circum stances in the summer of 1870 which led Cardwell to decide upon the abolition of purchase, his thesis contains much valuable information drawn from the Cardwell Papers in the Public Record Office. Moses also gives a detailed picture of how the business of purchasing commissions worked. For the stricdy military aspects of the Cardwell period, see my article ‘British Military Thinking and the Coming of the Franco-Prussian War’, Military Affairs, xxxix, I (02 1975), 19–22.Google Scholar

6 Tucker, Albert V., ‘Army and Society in England 1870–1900: A Reassessment of the Card- well Reforms’, Journal of British Studies, II (1963), 110–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Otley, C. B., ‘The Social Origins of British Army Officers’, Sociological Review, new ser., XVII (1970), 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 The Times, 22 Oct. 1868.

9 Earl Granville to Gladstone, 2 Aug. 1868, Gladstone Papers, B[ritish] M[useum] Add. MSS 44165, fo. 170.

10 Erickson, , Edward T. Cardwell: Peelite, pp. 22–67, passim.Google Scholar

11 Memorandum by Victoria, Queen, 3 12 1868, Buckle, G. E. (ed.), Letters of Queen Victoria, 2nd ser. (2 vols., New York, 1926), I, 565.Google Scholar

12 General Sir Biddulph, Robert, Lord Cardwell at the War Office: A History of his Administration, 1868–1874 (London, 1904), p. v.Google Scholar

13 Cardwell to Gladstone, 9 Jan. 1869, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 22–4.

14 Hansard's Parliamentary Debates (3rd ser.), cxciv, House of Commons (11 Mar. 1869), 1113–30.

15 Ibid. (10 June 1869), pp. 1501–13.

16 Ibid. CXCIX (3 Mar. 1870), 1191–5.

17 Ibid. pp. 1206–8, 1211–14.

18 Ibid. pp. 1172–4.

19 Fortescue, , A History of the British Army, XIII, 169–71Google Scholar, and ‘The Army’, in Young, G. M. (ed.), Early Victorian England (2 vols., Oxford, 1934), I, 354–5, 369Google Scholar; Woodward, E. L., The Age of Reform (Oxford, 1938), pp. 265–70Google Scholar; Briggs, Asa, Victorian People (New York, 1963), pp. 60–61Google Scholar; Reader, W. J., Professional Men: The Rise of the Professional Classes in 19th Century England (London, 1966), pp. 74–80, 83–4.Google Scholar

20 Report of Royal Commission on Purchase, House of Commons, Sessional Papers (1857), XVIII. 1–316.Google Scholar

21 Report of Royal Commission on Over-Regulation, House of Commons, Sessional Papers (1870), XII, 199–223.Google Scholar There is an interesting discussion of over-regulation prices and of the purchase system in general in Reader, , op. cit. pp. 74–8.Google Scholar Like many students of the issue, Reader sees the movement to abolish purchase as an attempt to bring middle-class men into the officer corps, which it was not.

22 3Hansard, cxcix, House of Commons (3 03 1870), 1204–6, 1228.Google Scholar

23 Ibid. (10 Mar. 1870), p. 1629.

24 Ibid. (14 Mar. 1870), p. 1876.

25 Cardwell, E. T., Memorandum on ‘Military Organization’, most confidential [Oct. 1870]Google Scholar, Granville Papers, P.R.O. 30/29/68, fo. 84; copy of the same memorandum in Gladstone Papers, B.M. Add. MSS 44615, fos. 33 ff. For the date of this memorandum see Cardwell to Gladstone, 5 Oct. 1870, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fo. 155.

26 Report of Royal Commission on Over-Regulation, House of Commons, Sessional Papers (1870), XII, 199–223.Google Scholar

27 3Hansard, cxcix, House of Commons (3 03 1870), 1191–5.Google Scholar

28 Gladstone to Earl Russell, 24 Mar. 1870, copy, Gladstone Letter Books, B.M. Add. MSS 44538, fos. 108–9.

29 Cardwell to Gladstone, 22 Sept. 1870, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 151–2.

30 Northbrook to Cardwell, 8 July [1872], P.R.O. 30/48/4/21, fo. 12.

31 Memorandum on ‘Military Organization,’ cited above, P.R.O. 30/29/68, to. 84.

32 Cardwell to Gladstone, 28 May 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 239–40.

33 Lieutenant Evelyn Baring, ‘Arguments for and against the purchase system,’ most con fidential, 14 Feb. 1871, P.R.O. 30/29/68, fos. 232–51.

34 Major-General Sir George Balfour, Minute on the Abolition of Purchase, 10 Jan. 1871, P.R.O. W[ar] O[ffice] 33/22/441, fos. 70–71; ‘Extracts - Reports of Military Attaché,’ War Office, 1871, W.O. 33/24/501, fo. 34; Brigadier John Adye, Memorandum on Army Organization. Dec. 1870, W.O. 33/22/437. fo. I3.

35 3Hansard, CCIV, House of Commons (3 Mar. 1871), 1416–69Google Scholar; (9 Mar. 1871), 1705–41; (13 Mar. 1871), 1902–51; ccv, House of Commons (16 Mar. 1871), 100–144; (17 Mar. 1871) 210–33.

36 Baring, , ‘Arguments for and against the purchase system’, fo. 241.Google Scholar

37 Ibid. fo. 235.

38 Minutes of Evidence, Royal Commission on Purchase, House of Commons, Sessional Papers (1857), XVIII 298–9.Google Scholar

39 Baring, , ‘Arguments for and against the purchase system’, fo. 236.Google Scholar

40 Cardwell to Gladstone, 16 Oct. 1870, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fo. 161.

41 The Times, 26 Sept. 1870, Leeds Mercury, 22 Aug., 3 Oct. 1870; Standard, 10 Feb. 1871; Manchester Guardian, 27 Sept., 14, 17 Oct. 1870; Saturday Review, 27 Aug. 1870.

42 The Times, 30 Dec. 1870; Daily News, 22 Nov. 1870; Guardian, 23 Dec. 1870; Birmingham Daily Gazette, 4 Aug. 1870.

43 Cardwell to Glyn, 15 Sept. 1870, copy, P.R.O. 30/48/5/25, fos. 88–90; same to Gladstone, 26 Dec. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/2/7, fos. 207–8; same to Lowe, 21 Dec. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/5/22, fo. 125.

44 Cardwell to Gladstone, 17 Nov. 1870, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 173–4.

45 Gladstone to Lady Herbert, 6 Dec. 1870, copy, Gladstone Letter Books, B.M. Add. MSS 44539, fo. 91; same to Cardwell, 13 Dec. 1870, copy, Ibid. fo. 99.

46 Gladstone to Lady Herbert, 13 Dec. 1870, copy, Gladstone Letter Books, B.M. Add. MSS 44539. fo. 100.

47 The Times, 16 Feb. 1871.

48 Glyft to Cardwell, 14 Sept. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/5/25, fos. 93–5.

49 Northbrook to Cardwell, 30 Sept. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/4/19, fos. 98–101.

50 Memorandum on ‘Military Organization’, cited above, P.R.O. 30/29/68, fo. 83.

51 Gladstone, W. E., Memorandum on Army Questions, 13 Oct. 1870Google Scholar, B.M. Add. MSS 44759, fos. 174–5, 178–80.

52 Gladstone to Cardwell, 14 Oct. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/2/7, fo. 155.

53 Earl, of Kimberley, , A Journal of Events during the Gladstone Ministry, 1868–1874, ed. Drus, Ethel, Camden 3rd ser., xc (London, 1958), 19.Google Scholar

54 Duke of Cambridge to Cardwell, 24 Nov. 1869, P.R.O. 30/48/3/12, fo. 150; same to the same, 30 Sept. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/3/4, fos. 189–90.

55 Queen Victoria to Cardwell, 24 Jan. 1871, P.R.O. 30/48/1/3, fos. 13–14.

56 Cardwell to Gladstone, 6 Feb. 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 216–17.

57 The Times, 8 Feb. 1869.

58 3Hansard, cxciv, House of Commons (II 03 1869), 1094–1109.Google Scholar

59 Report of Select Committee on Military Organization, House of Commons, Sessional Papers (1860), VII, 5–6.Google Scholar

60 Queen Victoria to Cardwell, 1 Mar. 1869, Buckle, , op. cit. I, 584–5.Google Scholar

61 Report of War Office Committee on the Conduct of Business in the Army Departments, House of Commons, Sessional Papers (1870), XII, 1–17.Google Scholar

62 Gladstone to Cardwell, 21 Nov. 1869, copy, B.M. Add. MSS 44537, fo. 146.

63 Northbrook to Cardwell, 30 Jan. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/4/19, fos. 30–3.

64 Memorandum by Queen Victoria, 22 Dec. 1869, P.R.O. 30/48/1/1, fo. 88.

65 Cardwell to Gladstone, 16 Jan. 1870, copy, P.R.O. 30/48/2/7, fos. 13–14.

66 Same to the same, 7 Feb. 1870, copy, P.R.O. 30/48/2/7, fo. 22.

67 Annual Register of World Events 1870 (London, 1871), p. 92.Google Scholar

68 Queen Victoria to Cardwell, 10 Mar. 1870, P.R.O. 30/48/1/2, fos. 60–61.

69 Gladstone Memorandum, marked secret, 10 July 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44760, fo. 53.

70 Extract from the Queen's Journal, 19 July 1871, Buckle, , op. cit., II, 149.Google Scholar Queen Victoria to Duke of Cambridge, 24 July 1871, copy, Ibid. pp. 150–51.

71 Queen Victoria to Gladstone, 3 Oct. 1871, copy, P.R.O. 30/48/1/3, fo. 184.

72 Cardwell to Gladstone, 17 Nov. 1870, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fo. 174.

73 3Hansard, cciv, House of Commons (21 02 1871), 645–6.Google Scholar

74 Gladstone Memorandum, 8 Mar. 1871; B.M. Add. MSS 44760, fo. 15; Gladstone Memoran dum, 14 Mar. 1871, Ibid. fo. 17.

75 3Hansard, cciv, House of Commons (17 03 1871), 234–45.Google Scholar

76 Ibid. ccvi, House of Commons (25 May 1871), 1303.

77 Irish Times, 15 03 1871Google Scholar; Birmingham Daily Mail, 14 07 1871Google Scholar; Edinburgh, Scotsman, 2 03 1871Google Scholar; Liverpool Daily Post, 16 03 1871.Google Scholar

78 Daily News, 13 06 1871Google Scholar; Manchester Guardian, 24 05 1871Google Scholar; Scotsman, 7 06 1871Google Scholar; Glasgow North British Daily Mail, 19 06 1871Google Scholar; Birmingham Daily Mail, 20 06 1871.Google Scholar

79 3Hansard, cciv, House of Commons (13 03 1871), 1905.Google Scholar

80 Ibid. (9 Mar. 1871), p. 1748; (13 Mar. 1871), p. 1967; (16 Mar. 1871), pp. 147–8.

81 Ibid. ccv (23 Mar. 1871), 463–75; (24 Apr. 1871), pp. 1590–96.

82 Ibid. (24 Apr. 1871), pp. 1619, 1642.

83 Ibid. pp. 1664–5.

84 Ibid. ccvi, House of Commons (15 May 1871), 644.

85 Ibid. p. 861; (18 May 1871), p. 1021; (22 May 1871), pp. 1134, 1170.

86 Ibid. (25 May 1871), pp. 1274–9.

87 Ibid. pp. 1279–81.

88 Ibid. pp. 1284–1303. Those who spoke for Russell's motion included Colonel Corbett, Colonel North, Colonel Ruggles-Brise, Major Dickson, Colonel Barttelot and Colonel Stuart Knox, all Conservatives.

89 Division List, 3 Hansard, ccvi (25 05 1871), 1305–8.Google Scholar

90 The Times, 26 05 1871.Google Scholar

91 Gladstone to Cardwell, 27 May 1871, copy, Gladstone Letter Books, B.M. Add. MSS 44540, fos. 40–41, 44.

92 Cardwell to Gladstone, 28 May 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 244, 247.

93 Ibid. fos. 242–3.

94 Glyn to Gladstone, 27 May 1871, private, B.M. Add. MSS 44348, fos. 100–103, 107. Glyn was correct about the Rylands motion: it received 108 votes. Since it would have paid no over-regulation money at all, the Conservatives could scarcely support it, and many of them said so. It was defeated 285–108. 3Hansard, ccvi, House of Commons (8 06 1871), 1741.Google Scholar

95 Memorandum by Gladstone, 10 June [1871], B.M. Add. MSS 44760, to. 36. Cardwell to Ponsonby, 3 July 1871, P.R.O. 30/48/1/3, fo. 108.

96 Memorandum by Cardwell, 4 June 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 254, 256.

97 3Hansard, CCVII, House of Commons (19 06 1871), 281.Google Scholar

98 Ibid. ccvi, House of Commons (5 June 1871), 1587–91. It is somewhat misleading to say that Disraeli supported the abolition of purchase, but not the means used to abolish it. Buckle, , Life of Disraeli (6 vols.), v (London, 1920), 141.Google Scholar

99 3Hansard, CCVII, House of Commons (3 07 1871), 1073–7.Google Scholar

100 Reader, , op. cit., pp. 78–9.Google ScholarOtley, , op. cit., p. 215.Google Scholar

101 3Hansard, ccv, House of Commons (17 03 1871), 253–4Google Scholar; Ibid. ccvi, House of Commons (11 May 1871), 692.

102 Manchester Guardian, 10 Mar. 1871.

103 Glasgow North British Daily Mail, 14 03 1871Google Scholar; Liverpool Daily Post, 22 06 1871Google Scholar; Birmingham Daily Mail, 19 07 1871.Google Scholar

104 Disraeli to Northcote, 10 Mar. 1871, Buckle, , Life of Disraeli, v, 139.Google Scholar

105 Ensor, , op. cit., pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

106 Division List, 3 Hansard, CCVII (3 07 1871), 1073–7.Google Scholar

107 Ensor, , op. cit., p. 11Google Scholar; Woodward, , op. cit. p. 268Google Scholar; Morley, John, Life of Gladstone (3 vols., London, 1903), II, 361.Google ScholarReader, , op. cit., p. 98Google Scholar; Erickson, , Edward T. Cardwell, Peelite, p. 67.Google Scholar

108 Ponsonby to Cardwell, 28 Feb. 1871, P.R.O. 30/48/1/3, fo. 57.

109 Cardwell to Gladstone, 28 May 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 242–3.

110 Cabinet Minute by Cardwell and Sir Edward Lugard, 18 July 1871, P.R.O. 30/48/2/8, fo. 103.

111 Cardwell to Gladstone, 28 May 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fos. 240, 248.

112 Ibid. fo. 239.

113 Gladstone to Cardwell, 25 Sept. 1871, P.R.O. 30/48/2/8, fo. 153.

114 Morley, , op. cit., II, 361–5Google Scholar; Annual Register 1871, pp. 74–85, 304–8.Google Scholar

115 Leeds Mercury, 19 07 1871Google Scholar; Birmingham Daily Mail, 27 06 1871Google Scholar; Scotsman 19, 22 07 1871Google Scholar; Daily News, 22 07 1871Google Scholar; North British Daily Mail, 19 07 1871.Google Scholar

116 Cardwell to Gladstone, 28 May 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44119, fo. 248.

117 Gladstone to Cardwell, 27 May 1871, copy, Gladstone Letter Books, B.M. Add. MSS 44540, fos. 41–2.

118 Gladstone to Cardwell, 27 May 1871, copy, Gladstone Letter Books, Ibid. fo. 43.

119 3Hansard, CCVII, House of Commons (3 07 1871), 1069–70.Google Scholar

120 Gladstone Memorandum, 5 Oct. 1871, B.M. Add. MSS 44617, fo. 110.

121 Otley, , op. cit., p. 225, table v, and p. 232.Google Scholar