Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:59:35.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2. The Partition of Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Ronald Hyam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1964 , pp. 154 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 New Cambridge Modern History, XI (and ), chap, XXII, ‘The Partition of Africa’, 616Google Scholar.

2 Flint, J. E., Sir George Goldie and the Making of Nigeria (1960)Google Scholar.

3 Newbury, C. W., The Western Slave Coast and its Rulers (1961)Google Scholar.

4 The Timest 15 October 1889. Hammond, R. J., ‘Imperialism: Sidelights on a Stereo type’, Journ. Economic History, XXI (1961)Google Scholar, suggests that except at the end of its career, ‘financial gain, as well as decent administration, seem to have been subordinated’ in the British East Africa Company‘to the acquisition of territory for its own sakes. Hammond also quotes a Portuguese, Eça de Queiroz, writing in 1003:’ Precisely what preoccupies us, what gratifies us, what consoles us, is to contemplate Just the number of our possessions; to point here and there on the map with the finger; to intone proudly “we have eight, we have nine; we are a colonial power, we are a nation of seafarers”’ (pp. 583, 589).

5 Brunschwig, H., Mythes et Réalités de l'Impérialisme colonial français 1871-1914 (Paris 1960)Google Scholar.

6 McKay, D. V., ‘Colonialism in the French Geographical Movement, 1871-1881’, Geo graphical Review, XXXIII (1943)Google Scholar. Blyden, E. W., Agent to the Interior in Sierra Leone, 1872–1873Google Scholar, wrote to E. D. Morel, 15 September 1902, uying it seemed the war of 1870-71 was a necessary preliminary to the great political and economic work of France in Africa; she was a decade getting her breath, but then she made Africa the field of her energies (Morel Papers, F. 9).

7 India Office Library, MSS. Eur. F. 84/14, p. 79, Elgin to Secretary of State for India, 9 June 1896. My italics.

8 Quoted in Lugard, F. D., The Rise of Our East African Empire (1893), 11, 585Google Scholar.

9 MSS. Eur. F. 84/15, Appendix, p. 95, Elgin to Secretary of State for India, 15 September 1897.

10 Quoted in Ingham, K., A History of East Africa (1962), 133Google Scholar.

11 The Times, 5 May 1898. My italics.

12 Gavin, R., Palmerston's Policy towards the East and West Coasts of Africa (Unpublished Cambridge University Ph.D. thesis, 1959), 231, 347 ffGoogle Scholar.

13 MacDonald, J. Ramsay, Labour and the Empire (1907), 65Google Scholar.

14 Lugard, F. D., The Dual Mandate (4th edn. 1929), 3-4, 613Google Scholar.

15 Quoted in Diké, K. O., Trade and Politics in the Niger Delta (1956), 211Google Scholar.

16 Quoted in Oliver, R., Misrionary Factor in East Africa (1952), 124Google Scholar. See also Orr, C. W., Making of Northern Nigeria (1911)Google Scholar: the economic motive ‘was undoubtedly the primary cause of Great Britain's action in assuming administrative responsibility’, for ‘economic reasons necessitate the development of the resources of tropical regions’; that European activity in Africa in the later nineteenth century' was mainly prompted by a desire for fresh/markets and a field for commercial enterprise may at once be conceded. But it would be unfair and unjust not to recognise as well that it was prompted also by a real and genuine desire for the welfare of the inhabitants, by substituting an era of law and order for the pitiful condition of insecurity and inter-tribal warfare in which they lived’ (pp. 20, 48, 281-2).

17 Quoted in Lugard, , Rite of our East African Empire, II, 590 nGoogle Scholar.

18 Newbury, C. W., ‘Victorians, Republicans and the Partition of Africa’, Jotar. African History, III (1962), 500 nGoogle Scholar.

19 Newbury, , The Waters Slave Court and its Rulers, 120–1Google Scholar.

20 Lugard, Dual Mandate, 4.

21 Quoted in Stengen, J., ‘L'Impénalisme Colonial de la fin du XIXe siècle’, Jour of African Hittory, III (1962), 488Google Scholar.

22 Quoted in Cecil, G., Lift of Robert, Marquis of Sato'burys TV (1932), 323Google Scholar.

23 Public Record Office, Cromer Papers, F.O. 633/6, p. 357, Cramer to Lanadowne 27 November 1903, recalling Saliabury's remark to Cromer.

24 Keltie, J. S., The Partition of Africa (1895)Google Scholar.

25 Stengen, J., ‘L'lmpéralisme Colonial de la fin du XIXe siècle’, Jour. African. History, III (1962), 471–83Google Scholar.

26 Quoted in Ramm, A., Political Correspondence of Mr Gladstone and Lord Granville 1876-1886 (1962), II. 304Google Scholar.

27 [F. D. Lugard], ‘Imperial interests in East Africa’, Blacktwood's Edinburgh Mageumte, 155 (1894), 860–1Google Scholar.

28 Quoted in Oliver, R., ‘Some factors in the British occupation of East Africa, 1884-1894’, Uganda Journal, XV (1951), 63Google Scholar.

29 Oliver, , Missionary Factor, 207Google Scholar.

30 Oliver, R., Sir Harry Johnston and the Scramble far Africa (1957), 245Google Scholar

31 Quoted in Hoskins, H. L., ‘British Policy in Africa, 1873-77’, Geographical Review, XXXII (1942), 142Google Scholar; Hoskins discusses the attempt to deal with the new situation. In 1877 Battle Frere expressed the belief that trouble with Germany was brewing in South Africa, and so he urged huge annexations.

32 Salisbury wrote in 1877: ‘I fed convinced that the old policy-wise enough in its time- of defending English interests by sustaining the Ottoman dynasty has become impracticable, and I think that the time has come for defending English interests in a more direct way by some territorial rearrangement’ ( Cecil, , op. cit. II, 130Google Scholar). He felt the geographical situation of Egypt, as well as the responsibility which the English government had in the past incurred for the actual conditions under which it existed as a State, made it impossible to leave it to its fate. Lady Cecil considered that Salisbury‘from his first occupation with the [Egyptian] question, seems to have had no doubt as to what must be its ultimate issue, and at the outset was prepared actively to promote it’ (ibid. 329). See also Langer, W. L., European Alliances and Alignmentt, 1871-1890 (New York, 1950), 257Google Scholar. It is interesting to note that Wilfrid Blunt thought the partition ‘may be said to have begun’ at the Congress of Berlin in 1878, when die joint financial intervention in Egypt was arranged with France, and, as he put it, ‘Tunis was given her in return for Cyprus, a scandalous beginning’ ( Blunt, W. S., My Diaritt, part 11, 1900-1904, p. 72Google Scholar, entry for 31 August 1903).

33 Parliamentary Debates, 4th ser., vol. 116, col. 516, II December 1902.

34 Cecil, , op. cit. IV, 226Google Scholar.

35 Hargreaves, J. D., ‘Towards a History of the Partition of Africa’, Jour. African History, I (1960), 98–109Google Scholar.

36 Parliamentary Debates, 5th ser, Lords, vol 5, col. 557-8, 6 April 1910.

37 Public Record Office, C.O. 446/53/18617, minute by Elgin, 18 June 1906. My italics.

38 Parliamentary Debates, 5th ocries, Commons, vol 17, col. 1153, 13 June 1910.

39 Aron, R., Imperialism and Colonialism, 17th Montague Burton Lecture on International Relations (1959), 7Google Scholar.

40 See, for example, Hinsley, F. H., New Cambridge Modern History, XI, chap. I, 45–7Google Scholar; Landes, D. S., ‘Economic Imperialism’, Journ. Economic History, XXI (1961), 510–12Google Scholar.

41 See above, p. 158.

41 MacDonagh, O., ‘The Anti-imperialism of Free Trade’, Economic History Review, and ser. XIV (1962), 489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar, comments on Gallagher, J. and Robinson, R. E., ‘The Imperialiam of Free Trade’, Economic History Review, and ser. VI (1953)Google Scholar, remarking that it did sometimes matter who was in power; Gladstone would never have bought the Suez Canal shares in 1875; Disraeli's highly personal decision ‘materially influenced’ the genesis of the scramble for Africa, for the purchase of shares was a pre-condition of the events leading up to the occupation of Egypt.

43 Goodfellow, C. F., The Policy of South African Confederation, 1870-1881’, Cambridge University Ph.D. thesis (1961), to be published by LongmansGoogle Scholar.

44 CO. 291/71/33839, minute by Sir Fred Graham, 15 July 1904.

45 Ganon, N. G., ‘British Imperialism and the Coming of the Anglo-Boer War’, 140–33Google Scholar. South African Journal of Economics, XXX (1962)Google Scholar.