Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:44:34.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1 The King of Hearts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

G. R. Elton
G. R. Elton
Affiliation:
Clare CollegeCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1969 , pp. 158 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 J.A. Froude, History of England, esp. iv, 238 ff.; A. F. Pollard, Henry VIII (1902); (e.g.) R. W. Chambers, Thomas More (1935); G. R. Elton, Henry VIII: an Essay in Revision (Hist. Ass. Pamphlet, 1962).

2 More of the Lincolnshire rebels were pardoned than hanged; several men guilty of rebellion were acquitted by juries; the seventy-odd men hanged at Carlisle were summarily executed by the field-commander in accordance with the laws of war, and no one at the time would have acted differently.

3 Cf. my Tudor Constitution (1960), p. 336 n. 3.

4 ‘Modern’ sovereignty (legislative authority) now vested in the Parliament; ‘medieval’ sovereignty (rulership) vested in the Crown.

5 E.g. p. 201: ‘ This magnificent vista [an unworkable plan to use the pope's difficulties in 1528] was, it seems, largely of Henry's creation. It was full of blatant, and probably inept, guile.' P. 206: ‘Henry had not the courage to take matters into his own hands and risk a solution which might well have worked.' P. 320: Henry's stupidity alone ruined the efforts of Francis I to help him.

6 Dr Scarisbrick (p. 251) is uncertain whether the anti-clerical bills of 1529 were spontaneous or ‘disguised government legislation’. These bills were foreshadowed in city circles before the Parliament met (cf. my remarks in Econ. Hist. Rev. Second Series, xm, 1961, 437).

7 Cf. my‘ Sir Thomas More and the Opposition to Henry VIII’, Bull. Inst. Hist. Research, XLI (1968), 19 ff.

8 Elton, G.R., ‘ The Commons' Supplication of 1532’, Eng. Hist. Rev. LXVI (1951), 507 ff.;CrossRefGoogle ScholarKelly, M.J., ‘The Submission of the Clergy’, Trans. R. Hist. Soc. (1965), pp. 97 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar