Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T16:53:53.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Related Binaries, Including Symbiotic Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Jorge Sahade
Jorge Sahade*
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía, C.C. 5, 1894 Villa Elisa (Bs. As.), Argentina, Member of the Carrera del Investigador Científico, CONICET, Argentina.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the context of the Joint Discussion, it is clear that by “long period binaries” we understand the system of ∊ Aurigae and the ζ Aurigae systems. The question is, then, how to determine which systems could be considered “related” to those long period ones.

Type
Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 7: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XIXth General Assembly of the IAU, 1985 , 1986 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986

References

Allen, D.A. 1984, Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia 5, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batten, A.H. and Sahade, J. 1973, Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific 85, 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarchuck, A.A. 1969, in Non-Periodic Phenomena in Variable Stars, ed. Detre, L. (Budapest: Academic Press), p. 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarchuck, A.A. 1975, in Variable Stars and Stellar Evolution, eds. Sherwood, V.E. and Plaut, L. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R.D. 1981, Astrophys. J. 248, 1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feast, M.W., Catchpole, R.M., Whitelock, P.A., Carter, B.S. and Roberts, G. 1983a, Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 203, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feast, M.W., Robertson, B.S.C., and Catchpole, R.M. 1977, Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 179, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feast, M.W., Whitelock, P.A., Catchpole, R.M., Roberts, G. and Carter, B.S. 1983b, Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 202, 951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, M., van den Heuvel, E.P.J., Hoekstra, R., de Jager, C. and Sahade, J. 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 50, 335.Google Scholar
Huang, S.-S. 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavec, M. 1982, in The Nature of Symbiotic Stars, eds. Friedjung, M. and Viotti, R. (Dordrecht: Reidel), p. 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavec, M., Dobias, J.J., Etzel, P.B. and Weiland, J.L. 1984, in Future Of Ultraviolet Astronomy Based on Six Years of IUE Research, eds. Mead, J.M. Chapman, R.D. and Kondo, Y, NASA- C? 2349, p. 420.Google Scholar
Sahade, J. 1966a, in Stellar Evolution, eds. Stein, E. F. and Cameron, A.G.W. (New York: Plenum Press), p. 449.Google Scholar
Sahade, J. 1966b, Trans. International Astron. Union 12B, 494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahade, J. 1976, Mem. Soc. R. Sci. Liege, 6eme serie, 9, 303.Google Scholar
Sahade, J. Brandi, E. and Fontenla, J.M. 1984, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 56, 17.Google Scholar
Sahade, J. and Hernàndez, C.A. 1985, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofís. 10, 257.Google Scholar
Sahade, J. and Wood, F.B. 1978, in Interacting Binary Stars (Pergamon Press), p. 152.Google Scholar
Struve, O. 1956, Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific 68, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swings, J.P. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
Webster, B.L. and Allen, D.A. 1975, Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 171, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelock, P.A., Catchpole, R.M., Feast, W., Roberts, G. and Carter, B.S. 1983a, Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 208, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelock, P.A., Feast, M.W., Catchpole, R.M., Carter, B.S. and Roberts, G. 1983b, Mon. Not. R. astron. Soc. 203, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar