Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:24:05.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production of Helium by Stellar Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

R. Kippenhahn
R. Kippenhahn*
Affiliation:
Universitäts-Sternwarte Göttingen, Göttingen, D.B.R.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In order to maintain the luminosity of the Galaxy ⅓ of a solar mass of hydrogen has to be transformed into helium every year. This rate of production is too small by a factor 10 or 20 in order to give a helium content of Y = 0.3-04. within the age of the galaxy if the mass fraction Y of helium was zero at the beginning. The situation is even worse if the destruction of helium by helium burning is taken into account. In his review paper Tayler (1967) came already to this conclusion. I shall discuss the problem here using more recent model calculations, but we shall come up with the same result.

Type
III. Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 2: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XIVth General Assembly of the IAU, 1970 , 1971 , pp. 296 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971

References

Appenzeller, I.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 355.Google Scholar
Christy, R. F.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 145, 340.Google Scholar
Christy, R. F.: 1968, Quart. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 9, 13.Google Scholar
Hayashi, C., Hoshi, R., and Sugimoto, D.: 1962, Progr. Theoret. Phys. Suppl. No. 22, 1.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R., Kohl, K., and Weigert, A.: 1967, Z. Astrophys. 66, 58.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R., Thomas, H.-C., and Weigert, A.: 1965, Z. Astrophys. 61, 241.Google Scholar
Lucy, L. B.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 813.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, J. A.: 1939, Astrophys. J. 90, 294.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. and Ziolkowski, J.: 1968, IAU Symp. No. 34, D. Reidel PubL. Co., Dordrecht-Holland, p. 396.Google Scholar
Roxburgh, I. W.: 1967, Nature 215, 838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, L.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 531.Google Scholar
Stein, W. A., Gaustad, J. E., Gillet, F. C., and Knacke, R. F.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, L3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobie, R. S.: 1969, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 144, 511.Google Scholar
Tayler, R. J.: 1967, Quart. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 8, 313.Google Scholar
Temesvary, St. and v. Hoerner, S.: 1960, Z. Astrophys. 49, 30.Google Scholar
Thomas, H.-C.: 1967, Z. Astrophys. 67, 420.Google Scholar
Truran, J. W., Hansen, C. J., and Cameron, A.G.W.: 1965, Can. J. Phys. 43, 1616.Google Scholar
Weigert, A.: 1966, Z. Astrophys. 64, 395.Google Scholar