Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:10:42.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical Redshift Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

L. Nicolaci da Costa
L. Nicolaci da Costa*
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and CNPq/Observatório Nacional60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Redshift surveys of galaxies have been over the past decade the major source of information for studies of the large-scale structure of the Universe. Following the completion of the original CfA Redshift Survey, several groups have joined the endeavor, probing different regions of the sky to different depths in a remarkable long-term effort to study the nature of the galaxy distribution and its statistical properties at different scales. Here I summarize the current status of the ongoing surveys drawn from optical galaxy catalogs. The review is not intended to be complete but rather to demonstrate the vitality of the area and to point out that exciting new data should be forthcoming in the next few years.

Type
Joint Commission Meetings
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 9: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XXIst General Assembly of the IAU, 1991 , 1992 , pp. 681 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1992

References

Broadhurst, T. J., Ellis, R. S., Koo, D.C., and Szalay, A. S., 1990. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 343, 726.Google Scholar
da Costa, L. N., 1991. In The Proceedings of the Second DAEC Meeting, The Distribution of Matter in the Universe, eds. Gerbal, D. and Mamon, G., in press.Google Scholar
da Costa, L. N., Pellegrini, P. S., Willmer, C. N. A., and Latham, D. W., 1989. Astrophys. J. 344, 20.Google Scholar
da Costa, L. N., Pellegrini, P. S., Davis, M., Meiksin, A., Sargent, W. L. W., and Tonry, J., 1991. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 76, 935.Google Scholar
Dressier, A., 1991. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 75, 241.Google Scholar
Fairall, A. P., Latham, D. W., Calderon, J. H., Willmer, C. N. A., da Costa, L. N., Pellegrini, P. S., Nunes, M. A., Focardi, P., and Vettolani, G., 1991. Astron. J. in press.Google Scholar
Geller, M. J., and Huchra, J. P., 1989. Sci. 246, 897.Google Scholar
Geller, M.J., Kurtz, M., Fabricant, D., Schild, R., Huchra, J. P., Thorstensen, J. R., and Wegner, G., 1991. Private communication.Google Scholar
Haynes, M. P., and Giovanelli, R. 1986. Astrophys. J. (Lett.) 306, L55.Google Scholar
Huchra, J. P., Davis, M., Latham, D. W., and Tonry, J. L., 1983. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 52, 89.Google Scholar
Huchra, J. P., Latham, D. W., da Costa, L. N., Pellegrini, P. S., and Willmer, C. N. A., 1991. In preparation.Google Scholar
Kirshner, R. P., Oemler, A. E., Schechter, P. L., Sheet man, S. A., 1991. Private communication.Google Scholar
Koo, D., 1991. Private communication.Google Scholar
Tully, R. B., and Fisher, J. R., 1987. Nearby Galaxy Atlas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willmer, C. N. A., Pellegrini, P. S., da Costa, L. N., Fairall, A. P., Focardi, P., Latham, D. W., and Calderon, J. H., 1991. In preparation.Google Scholar