Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:10:31.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Heterogeneity of Surfaces of Magnetic AP Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

M. Hack
M. Hack*
Affiliation:
Osservatorio Astronomiao Trieste, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The observations of spectrum-variability and light-variability of Ap stars are reviewed. It is shown that these variations are interpretable as due to the changing aspect of the spotted surface as the star rotates. It is stressed that we understand fairly well the geometry of the phenomenon but the physics is very far from being understood.

Magnetic Ap stars are probably those where the presence of a spotted surface is very evident. Their spectrum-variability (profiles, line-intensity and radial velocity), light-variability and magnetic field variability, all occurring with the same period, are explained in a simple way if we assume that these variations are due to the changing aspect of the spotted surface as the star rotates. The oblique rotator model was proposed by Babcock in 1949 and by Stibbs in 1950 and was worked out in great detail by Deutsch (1954). This model allows us to explain the magnetic field variation from some + 1000 to some - 1000 gauss in a few days; it explains the crossover effect, the line-width versus period relations, the line - intensity and radial velocity variation, and in part also the light curves. The main objection against the oblique rotator hypothesis was the supposed existence of many irregularly variable magnetic stars. However, the large number of observations accumulated in the last twenty years indicates that probably all magnetic Ap spectrum-variables are regular variables with periods which are generally of a few days, but includes a small group of long period variables (100 days up to 23 years for HD 9996). The light variability, which is the quantity measurable with the highest precision, has often remained undetected, because the amplitude is always small, in many cases few hundreths of magnitude.

Type
Joint Meeting
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 4 , Issue 2: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XVIth General Assembly of the IAU, 1976 (Part II) , 1977 , pp. 389 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1977

References

Aslanov, I. A., Hildebrandt, G., Khokhlova, V. L., and Schoneich, W: 1973 Astrophys. Space Sei. 21, 477.Google Scholar
Aslanov, I. A.: 1975 Pis’ma Astron.Zh. 1, 39 (Sov. Astron. Lett. 1, 64)Google Scholar
Babcock, H. W.: 1949 Observatory 69, 191.Google Scholar
Deutsch, A. J.: 1947 Astroph. J. 105, 283 1954 Trans. IAU 8, 801 1957 IAU Symp. 6, 209 1970 Astroph. J. 159, 985.Google Scholar
Glagolevskii, YU. V., Kozlova, K. I., and Polosukhina, N. S.: 1974 Astrofizika 10, 517 (Astrophysics 10, 327)Google Scholar
Khokhlova, V. L.: 1975 Astron.Zh. 52, 950 (Sov.Astron. 19, 576)Google Scholar
Leckrone, D. S.: 1974 Astroph. J. 190, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megessier, C.: 1974 Astron, Astroph. 34, 53 1975 Astron, Astroph. 39, 263.Google Scholar
Michaud, G.: 1970 Astroph. J. 160, 641.Google Scholar
Molnar, M. R.: 1973 Astroph. J. 179, 527 1975 Astroph. J. 80, 137.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. M.: 1970 Astroph. J. 161, 685.Google Scholar
Preston, G. W.: 1971 Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 83, 571.Google Scholar
Provin, S. S.: 1953a) Astroph. J. 117, 21 1953 b) Astroph. J. 118, 489.Google Scholar
Pyper, D. M.: 1969 Astroph. J. Suppl. 18, 347.Google Scholar
Rakosch, K. D.: 1962a) Lowell Bull. 5, 227 1962 b) Z. Astrophys. 56, 153 1963 Lowell Bull. 6, 91.Google Scholar
Rice, J. B.: 1970 Astron. Astroph. 9, 189.Google Scholar
Ryabchikova, T. A.: 1974 Astron. Zh. 51, 761 (Sov. Astron. 18, 451)Google Scholar
SchÖneich, W., Hildebrandt, G., and Furtig, W.: 1976a) Astron. Nachr. 297, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SchÖneich, W., Krivosheina, A. A., Khokhlova, V. L., and Aslanov, I. A. 1976b Astron. Nachr. 297, 207.Google Scholar
Schoneich, W., and Staude, J.: 1976 in pressGoogle Scholar
Stepien, K.: 1968a) Astron. J. 73, S 36 1968 b) Astroph. J. 153, 165 1968 c) Astroph. J. 154, 945.Google Scholar
Stibbs, D. W. N. 1950 Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 110, 395.Google Scholar
Wolff, S. C. and Wolff, R. J.: 1970 Astroph. J. 160, 1049 1971 Astron. J. 76, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar