Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:42:25.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subjective Thinking: Kierkegaard on Hegel's Socrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Daniel Watts
Daniel Watts*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Essex, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

One of the more surreal moments in Kierkegaard's journals involves a scene from the Underworld. Hegel has been reading Trendelenburg's Logical Investigations, and goes over to Socrates to complain. Alas, the conversation has trouble getting off the ground:

Socr.: Should we begin by being altogether in disagreement, or should we agree on something we could call a presupposition?…. What do you presuppose as your starting-point?

H.: Nothing at all.

Socr: That's quite something! So perhaps you don't start at all?

H.: I not start, I who have written 21 volumes?

Socr: Ye gods, what a hecatomb you have offered!

H.: But I start from nothing.

Socr.: Is that not something?

H.: No – on the contrary. That first makes its appearance in the conclusion of the whole, in the course of which I discuss science, world history etc.

Socr.: How might I be able to master this difficult task for many remarkable things may well be included which would show up my stupidity… You know that I did not even allow Polos to talk more than 5 minutes at a time, and you want to talk XXI volumes.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring/Summer 2010 , pp. 23 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, H. (2002), ‘Problems with Socratic Method’ in Scott, G. A. (ed.), Does Socrates have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond. Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
Capel, L. M. (1971), ‘Introduction’ in Kierkegaard, S., The Concept of Irony, with Constant Reference to Socrates, trans. Capel, L. M.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Daise, B. (1999), Kierkegaard's Socratic Art. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1985), Hegel's Introduction to the lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Knox, T. M. and Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopaedia Logic, trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A. and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995), Lectures on the History of Philosophy I: Greek Philosophy to Plato, trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2006), Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825-6 Volume II: Greek Philosophy, trans. Brown, R. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1909–1948), Papirer, ed. Heiberg, J, Kuhr, V. and Torsting, E., vol. VI. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1967), Søren Kierkegaard's journals and Papers, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H., I: A-E. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1989), The Concept of Irony with Continual Reference to Socrates; Schelling Lecture Notes, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1992), Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kofman, S. (1998), Socrates: Fictions of a Philosopher. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2007), ‘Socrates in Hegel’ in Trapp, M. B. (ed.), Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Muench, P. (2005), ‘Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View’ in Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R. (eds.), A Companion to Socrates. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pattison, G. (2002a), Kierkegaard's Upbuilding Discourses: Philosophy, Literature and Theology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pattison, G. (2002b), “Beyond the Grasp of Irony’ in Perkins, R. (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: The Concept of Irony. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Pattison, G. (2007), “A Simple Wise Man of Ancient Times: Kierkegaard on Socrates” in Trapp, M. B. (ed.), Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1962), Plato's Earlier Dialectic, 2 nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M-J. (2001), ‘Kierkegaard's Socrates: A Venture in Evolutionary Theory’, Modern Theology 17: 442–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinett, M. W. (2000), Socratic Dialectic in the Authorship of Søren Kierkegaard. Fife: Theology in Scotland.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (2007), ‘Hegel: Kierkegaard's Reading and Use of Hegel's Primary Texts’ in Stewart, J. (ed.), Kierkegaard and his German Contemporaries, Tome I: Philosophy. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Swenson, D. F. (1983), ’Søren Kierkegaard – a Danish Socrates’ in Swenson, D. F., Something about Kierkegaard. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Velkley, R. L. (2006) “On Possessed Individualism: Hegel, Socrates' Daimon, and the Modern State’, The Review of Metaphysics, 59:3:577–99.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1983) ‘The Socratic Elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy I: 27–58.Google Scholar
Watts, D. (2007) “The Paradox of Beginning: Hegel, Kierkegaard and Philosophical Inquiry’, Inquiry 50:1: 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (2002), “Hegel on Socrates and Irony” in Duquette, D. (ed.), Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar