Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:19:25.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Social’ is Prior to the ‘Political’: Bosanquet Revisited (Again)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2013

Avital Simhony
Avital Simhony*
Affiliation:
School of Politics and Global StudiesArizona State [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The essay aims to reveal the priority of the ‘social’ over the ‘political’ in Bosanquet's thought by making more prominent what Bosanquet calls ‘social’. It is the domain of human connectedness and cooperation that occupies the space between the ‘political’, state action, and the personal, narrowly conceived individual. The centrality of the ‘social’ emerges against the backdrop of two rival interpretations of Bosanquet's relationship with British Idealism over state action. The one claims that Green's split into ‘right’ (Bosanquet) and ‘left’ (Ritchie). The other interpretation restores unity, denying that the right-left divide introduces fundamental differences into the Idealist camp. Though not a laissez-faire individualist, Bosanquet's restrictive stance on state action with regard to the poor reveals, I argue, ‘social individualism’. Best expressed in his prioritizing of ‘social cooperative action’ over state action, at the heart of social individualism lies a conceptual-normative nexus between self-maintaining, self-managing, self-governing individuals and social cooperation.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , October 2013 , pp. 245 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

My thanks to Thom Brooks for being there throughout while I was struggling to make the best of Bosanquet. I also thank Katerina Deligiorgi for her helpful comments.

References

Bosanquet, B. (1897), ‘Aspects of the Social Problem: A Reply’, International Journal of Ethics 7: 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1891), Essays and Addresses. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1893), The Civilization of Christendom. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1895-1896), ‘Symposium: Are Character and Circumstances Co-Ordinate Factors in Human Life or Is Either Subordinate to the Other’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 3/2: 112.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1998), ‘Book Review: Practical Ethics. A Collection of Addresses and Essays by Henry Sidgwick’, International Journal of Ethics Vol. 8, No. 3: 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1901), ‘The Meaning of Social Work’, International Journal of Ethics Vol. 11, No. 3: 299.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1909), ‘The Majority Report of the Poor Law Commission, 1909’, The Sociological Review Vol. II, No. 2: 114.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1913), The Value and Destiny of the Individual: The Gifford Lectures for 1912. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1920( [1899]), The Philosophical Theory of the State, 3rd edn.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Carter, M. (2003), TH Green and the Development of Ethical Socialism. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Collini, S. (1985), ‘The Idea of “Character” in Victorian Political Thought’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 35: 86-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, S. (1976), ‘Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the State: Philosophical Idealism and Political Argument in England 1880-1918’, Past and Present 72: 86-111.Google Scholar
Hardimon, M. O. (1994), Hegel's Social Philosophy. The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Follett, M. S. (1923[1918]), The New State. 4th Impression. London: Macmillan, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. (1994), Liberalism, in James Meadowcroft (ed.), Liberalism and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. (1974[1909]), Crisis of Liberalism. P. F. Clarke (ed.). New York: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Latta, R. (1905), ‘Memoir’, in D. G. Ritchie, Philosophical Studies, ed. Robert Latta. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (1996), ‘The Boundary between Voluntary and Statutory Social Service in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries’, The Historical Journal 39/1.Google Scholar
MacCunn, J. (1895), ‘Aspects of the Social Problems. Edited by Bernard Bosanquet’, International journal of Ethics 6/1: 105.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1999), On Liberty and other writings, ed. Stefan Collini Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, J. (2000), ‘Community, Class, and Bosanquet's “New State” ’, History of Political Thought 21/3: 485-499.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1908), The Service of the State. Four Lectures on the Political Teaching of TH Green. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. (1990), The Political Philosophy of the British Idealism. Selected Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. (2003), ‘Individualism vs. collectivism’, in T. Baldwin (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993), ‘The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life’. The American Prospect no. 13. Available online at: http://epn.org/prospect/13/13putn.htmlGoogle Scholar
Richter, M. (1964), The Politics of Conscience: T.H. Green and His Age. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1887), The Moral Function of the State. London: Women's Printing Society, Ltd.Google Scholar
Sorensen, A., Raffsoe-Moller, M.Gron, A. (eds.) (2009), Dialectics, Self-Consciousness and Recognition: The Hegelian Legacy. Malmo: NSU Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (2000), ‘Philosophy and Ideology in Bernard Bosanquet's Political Theory’, in W. J. Mander, (ed.), Anglo-American Idealism, 1865-1927. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar