Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:43:10.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Knowledge, Action and the Language of Confession in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Ulrich Schlösser
Ulrich Schlösser*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper offers an outline of the central issue Hegel is concerned with in his discussion of spirit. The issue is: how can we possibly confirm our basic and comprehensive claims to validity? In the ‘Spirit’ section of the Phenomenology, Hegel focuses on what we nowadays would call ‘thick conceptions’. The corresponding claims to knowledge relate (a) to a general worldview and (b) to the objective norms embedded in this worldview. Furthermore, they also include (c) a claim to self-knowledge, which is correlated to both.

Hegel suggests that if we want to validate these claims we should not look at merely given facts but at the actions performed on the basis of these claims — it's the deed that matters. But in making claims, we are also addressing others. The resulting questions are: How can they possibly recognise the action as a manifestation of the underlying principles? What follows for my self-knowledge if I accept that the judgement of others contributes to what the action really is and thus what it says about me?

The first part of the paper explores the general framework underlying Hegel's discussion of spirit. The second part exemplifies Hegel's conception by referring to different cultural realisations of spirit put forward in the sixth chapter of his Phenomenology: the focus will be on Hegel's interpretation of Sophocles' tragedy, Antigone. In the brief, final part I would like to point to three features of Hegel's account of spirit that I take to be still worthy of consideration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 32 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Issue on Kant and Hegel , 2011 , pp. 269 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hegel, G. W. F. (1970), Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975), Gesammelte Werke, vol. 6. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. (1924/1973), ‘Die Beisetzung der Romantiker in Hegels Phänomenologie’ in Henrich, D. and Fulda, F. (eds.), Materialien zu Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
James, W. (1975ff.), The Works of William James, ed. Burkhart, F., Bowers, F., and Skrupskelis, I.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Menke, C. (1996), Tragödie des Sittlichen. Gerechtigkeit und Freiheit nach Hegel. Frankurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931ff.), Collected Papers, ed. Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., and Burks, A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1994), Hegel's Phenomenology. The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlösser, U. (2006), ‘Bewusstseinsbegriff und Beweisstruktur in der “Einleitung” der Phänomenologie des Geistes’ in Karasek, J., Kunes, J., Landa, I. (eds.), Hegels Einleitung in die Phänomenologie des Geistes. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Schulte, M. (1992), Die ‘Tragödie im Sittlichen’: Zur Dramentheorie Hegels. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
Speight, A. (2001), Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1985), ‘Hegel's Philosophy of Mind’ in Collected Papers (vol. 1). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Welsch, W. and Vieweg, K. (eds.) (2001), Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ein kooperativer Kommentar. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar