No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Renate Wahsner, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Naturphilosophie. Über ihren Sinn im Lichte der heutigen Naturerkenntnis (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1996), pp. 244. ISBN 3663130756X. £32.00.
Review products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2015
Abstract
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 24 , Issue 1-2: number 47/48 , 2003 , pp. 127 - 128
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2003
References
1 Among these are: Petry, M.J. (ed.), Hegel and Newtonianism, Dordrecht 1993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Houlgate, S. (ed.), Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature, New York 1999 Google Scholar; Breidbach, O. & Engelhardt, D. v. (eds.), Hegel und die Lebenswissenschaften, Berlin 2000 Google Scholar; Wahsner, R. & Posch, Th. (eds.), Die Natur muß bewiesen werden. Zu Grundfragen der Hegelschen Naturphilosophie, Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] 2002 Google Scholar.
2 These doubts have already been raised in: Borzeszkowski, Horst-Heino v. & Wahsner, R., Physikalischer Dualismus und Dialektischer Widerspruch, Darmstadt 1989, p. 151–155 Google Scholar. The essential argument there is that the concept of mass is already required for a construction of a space-time-unity as Hegel tries to give it. (See also Borzeszkowski, H.-H. & Wahsner, R., Action and Reaction. Studies on Motion and Contradiction in Physics, Berlin (Logos Verlag) 2001, p. 60–61 Google Scholar).
3 Cf. Wahsner, R.: Zur Auswirkung der Hegelschen Physikrezeption auf die Naturphilosophie der Folgezeit. Hegel-Jahrbuch 1991 Google Scholar, S. 17-27, Fernwald (Annerod).