Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:58:35.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Philosophy: Hegel's Occasional Perplexity in the Face of the Distinction Between Philosophy and Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Robert Bernasconi
Robert Bernasconi*
Affiliation:
The University of Memphis
Get access

Abstract

Hegel is widely recognized as the preeminent philosopher of the history of philosophy. His Lectures on the History of Philosophy are designed in large measure to answer questions about philosophy's apparent futility by reformulating the presentation of the seemingly pointless succession of forms of philosophy so as to show its organic development (Hegel, 1994, 24). To reveal the proper shape of the history of philosophy, what is extraneous to it had to be omitted. Much that had previously been regarded as philosophy was now to be treated under the heading of religion. The distinction between philosophy and religion, the decision as to what was philosophy and what was religion, took on an importance it had previously lacked. Although subsequent historians of philosophy did not always share Hegel's concern to show the organic development of the history of philosophy, his decisions about what was to be included and what excluded from philosophy proved particularly important in respect of the question of the place subsequently given to Indian philosophy. For this reason Hegel deservedly holds a central place in current discussions about the philosophical canon.

Type
Hegel and Religion
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 23 , Issue 1-2: number 45/46 , January 2002 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ast, Friedrich (1807). Grundriss einer Geschichte der Philosophie. Landshut: Joseph Thomann.Google Scholar
Bernal, Martin (1987). Black Athena. Vol. One. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (1997). ‘Philosophy's Paradoxical Parochialism: The Reinvention of Philosophy as Greek.’ In Ansell-Pearson, K., Parry, B., and Squires, J. (eds.) Cultural Readings of Imperialism. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 212–226.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2000a). ‘Krimskrams: Hegel and the Current Controversy about the Beginning of Philosophy.’ In Scott, C. E. and Sallis, J. (eds.) Interrogating the Tradition. Albany: SUNY Press, 189–206.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2000b). ‘With What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin?’ Nineteenth Century Contexts, 22, 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2003). ‘With What Must the History of Philosophy Begin?’ In Duquette, David (ed.) Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. Albany: SUNY Press, 35–49.Google Scholar
Brucker, Jacob (1742). Historia critica philosophiae a mundi incunabulis ad nostram usque aetatem deducta. Vol. One. Leipzig: Christoph Breitkopf.Google Scholar
Buhle, Johann Gottlieb (1796). Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. One. Göttingen: Vandenhock und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Colebrooke, Henry Thomas (1824/1829). ‘On the Philosophy of the Hindus,’ Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. One, pp. 19–42, 92–118, 439–466, 549–579 and vol. Two, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Dickey, Laurence (1993). ‘Hegel on Religion and Philosophy’, in Beiser, F. C. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geraets, Theodore (1989). ‘The End of the History of Religions “Grasped in Thought”,’ HegelStudien vol. 24, pp. 55–77.Google Scholar
Gipper, Helmut (1986). “Understanding as a Process of Linguistic Appropriation” in Bynon, Theodora and Palmer, F. R. (eds.) Studies in the History of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
Halbfass, Wilhelm (1988). India and Europe. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1827). Review of W. von Humboldt, Über die unter dem Nahmen Bhagavad-Gītā bekannte Episode des Mahabharata, Erster Artikel. In Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik, vol. 1, 01 1827, cols. 51–65 and October 1827, cols. 1441-1492. Reprint Köln: Verlag für Philosophie.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1833). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie Vol. One. Ed. Michelet, Karl Ludwig. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1840). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. One. Ed. Michelet, Karl Ludwig. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1944). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Einleitung. System und Geschichte der Philosophie. Hoffmeister, Johannes, ed. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1980). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Gesammelte Werke 9. Bonsiepen, W. and Heede, R., eds. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1984). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion. Teil 3. Die Vollendete Religion. Vorlesungen vol. 5. Jaeschke, W., ed. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1985). Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Vol. 3. Brown, R. F., Hodgson, P. C., and Stewart, J. M., trans. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1989). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1827). Gesammelte Werke 19. Bonsiepen, W. and Lucas, H.-C., eds. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1992). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (1830). Gesammelte Werke 20. Eds. Bonsiepen, W. and Lucas, H.-C.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1994). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Teil 1. Vorlesungen vol. 6. Garniron, P. and Jaeschke, W., eds. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1995). On the Episode of the Mahābhārata Known by the Name Bhagavid-Gītā by Wilhelm von Humboldt, trans. Herring, Herbert. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1996). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte. Berlin 1822/23. Vorlesungen vol. 12. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Johannes, ed. (1969). Briefe von und an Hegel. Four vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hulin, Michel (1979). Hegel et l'Orient. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1906). “Über die unter dem Namen Bhagavad-Gita bekannte Episode des Mahà-Bhàrata,” in Gesammelte Werke, Vol. Five. Berlin: B. Behr.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1923). Kants gesammelte Schriften, Vol. 9. Akademie Ausgabe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
King, Richard (1999). Orientalism and Religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Köhler, Dietmar (1998). ‘Hegels Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Anmerkungen zur Editionsproblematik’ in Hegel-Studien vol. 33, pp. 53–83.Google Scholar
Menze, Clemens (1986). ‘Das Indische Altertum in der Sicht Wilhelm von Humboldts und Hegels’ in Hegel-Studien Beiheft vol. 27, pp. 245–294.Google Scholar
Michelet, Carl L. (1878). Das System der Philosophie als exacter Wissenschaft enthaltend Logik, Natur-und Geistesphilosophie, vol. 3. Berlin: Nicolai.Google Scholar
Nicolin, Günther, ed. (1970). Hegel in Berichten seiner Zeitgenossen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Rixner, Thaddä Anselm (1822). Handbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. One. Sulzbach: J. E. von Seidel.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich (1975). Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Inder. In Behler, E. and Struc-Oppenberg, U., Studien zur Philosophie und Theologie. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 105–317.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1980). Essays on Philosophical Subjects, eds. Wightman, W. P. D. and Bryce, J. C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb (1798). Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. One. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb (1816). Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Zweite vermehrte Auflage. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb (1825). Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Vierte vermehrte und verbesserte Auflage. Ed. Wundt, Amadeus, Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, D. (1791). Geist der spekulativen Philosophie. Vol. One. Marburg: Neue Akademische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Viyagappa, Ignatius (1980). G.W.F Hegel's Concept of Indian Philosophy. Rome: Gregoriana.Google Scholar
Voltaire, (1963). Essai sur les moeurs et l'esprit des nations, ed. Pomeau, R.. Paris: Editions Garniers Frères.Google Scholar
Windischmann, Hieron (1827–1832). Die Philosophie im Fortgang der Weltgeschichte. Erster Theil. Die Grundlagen der Philosophie im Morgenland. Three vols. Bonn: Adolph Marcus.Google Scholar