Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:11:29.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Possibility of a Phenomenology of Cultural Worlds in Hegel and Husserl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2017

Tanja Staehler
Tanja Staehler*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The world we live in proves best understood as a cultural world. Cultural worlds are examined in this article regarding their aesthetic and ethical dimensions, with the help of Hegel and Husserl. The ethical realm is characterized by a tension between ethical conscience and cultural norms. Even Hegel, who is often conceived as a philosopher of customs, explores the significance of conscience in a detailed phenomenology. Husserl provides a curious perspective on ethics when he, under the heading of a renewal (Japanese Kaizo) of reason, provides an account of a vaguely dialectical development of reason as logos which goes beyond the division between the ‘descriptive’ and ‘ethical’. In the wider sense of ethics, it is also ‘good’ to write about the world we live in. Literature (Hermann, Wallace) will be treated here as an exemplary art-form that stands in close proximity to philosophy since both strive to capture in language the world we live in.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 85 - 103
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harris, H. S. (1997), Hegel’s Ladder. Indianapolis IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975), Hegel’s Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Arts, trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1993), Sein und Zeit. 17th edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Melle, U. (2004), ‘Edmund Husserl: From Reason to Love’, in D. Moran and L. Embree (eds.), Phenomenology: Critical Concepts. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Siep, L. (1982), ‘Was heißt “Aufhebung der Moralität in Sittlichkeit” in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie?’ Hegel-Studien 17: 75–96.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. F. (1998), A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Welton, D. (1991), ‘Husserl and the Japanese’, Review of Metaphysics 44: 575–606.Google Scholar