Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:50:42.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Oriental’ Character of Islamic Philosophy in Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2020

Lorella Ventura Open the ORCID record for Lorella Ventura [Opens in a new window]
Lorella Ventura*
Affiliation:
Sapienza University of Rome, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In his Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Hegel characterizes Arabic/Islamic philosophy as ‘Oriental’. The meaning and motivation of this characterization are not obvious. In this paper, I address his treatment and outline the key ideas that lead Hegel to describe Islamic philosophy as ‘Oriental’. By highlighting similarities and differences in relation to Oriental philosophy, I shed light on Hegel's approach to Islamic philosophy, which is connected to his view of Oriental philosophy, the East and Islam in its various aspects, and to his more general view of the history of philosophy and of the Absolute as spirit.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , December 2021 , pp. 395 - 415
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, I. (2010), History of Islam in German Thought. From Leibniz to Nietzsche. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ayada, S. (2010), L'islam des théophanies. Paris: CNRS Editions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2003), ‘With What Must the History of Philosophy Begin? Hegel's Role in the Debate on the Place of India within the History of Philosophy’, in Duquette, D. A. (ed.), Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. F. (2009), ‘Editorial Introduction’, in Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825–26. Volume I: Introduction and Oriental Philosophy, trans. and ed. Brown, R. F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brucker, J. (1742 –44), Historia critica philosophiae, 4 Bde. Lipsiae: Bernhard Christoph Breitkopf.Google Scholar
Buhle, J. G. (1800–04), Geschichte der neuern Philosophie seit der Epoche der Wiederherstellung der Wissenschaften, 6 Bde. Göttingen: Johann Georg Rosenbusch's Wittwe.Google Scholar
Colebrooke, T. H. (1805), ‘On the Vedas, or sacred writings of the Hindus’, Asiatic Researches 8: 377–497.Google Scholar
Colebrooke, T. H. (1824–1829), ‘On the Philosophy of the Hindus’, Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1: 19–43, 92–118, 439–66, 549–79; 2: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djaït, H. (1978), L'Europe et l'Islam. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
van Ess, J. (1970), ‘The Logical Structure of Islamic Theology’, in von Grunebaum, G. E. (ed.), Logic in Classical Islamic Culture. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goethe, J. W. (1819), West-östlicher Divan. Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
Halbfass, W. (1988), ‘Hegel’, in India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
von Hammer-Purgstall, J. (1812–13), Der Diwan von Mohammed Schemsed-din Hafis. Aus dem Persischen zum erstenmal ganz übersetzt, 2 Bde. Stuttgart und Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar
Hentsch, T. (1988), L'Orient imaginaire. La vision politique occidentale de l'est Méditerranéen. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Hourani, A. (1991), Islam in European Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulin, M. (1979), Hegel et l'Orient. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, W. (1993), ‘Einleitung’, in Hegel, G. W. F., Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Teil 1. Einleitung. Orientalische Philosophie, neu hrsg. v. Jaeschke, W.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Jones, W. (1782), The Moallakāt or Seven Arabian Poems Which Were Suspended on the Temple at Mecca. London: P. Elmsly.Google Scholar
Kislev, S. F. (2018), ‘Hegel, Spinoza, and the ‘Principle of Individuality’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26: 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimonides, M. (1973), The Guide of the Perplexed, trans. Pines, S., 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2003), ‘Hegel's Method for a History of Philosophy: The Berlin Introductions to the Lectures on the History of Philosophy (1819–1831)’, in Duquette, D. A. (ed.), Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Olivier, A. P. (2008), Hegel, la genèse de l'esthetétique. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Pines, S. (1973), ‘Introduction’, in M. Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rathore, A. S. and Mohapatra, R. (eds.) (2017), Hegel's India. A Reinterpretation, with Texts. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rückert, F. (1821). ‘Mewlana Dschelaleddin Rumi’, in Taschenbuch für Damen auf das Jahr 1821. Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar
Rückert, F. (1826), Die Makamen des Hariri: Die Verwandlungen des Abu Seid von Serug. In freier Nachbildung. Stuttgart and Tübingen: Cotta.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. (1994), ‘Science and Philosophy in Medieval Islamic Thought’, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften 9: 1–42.Google Scholar
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Schlegel, F. (1808), Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Ein Beitrag zur Begründung der Alterthumskunde. Nebst metrisch Uebersetzungen indischer Gedichte. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.Google Scholar
Schulin, E. (1958), Die weltgeschichtliche Erfassung des Orients bei Hegel und Ranke. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Schwab, R. (1984), The Oriental Renaissance: Europe's Rediscovery of India and the East, 1680–1880, trans. Patterson-King, G. and Reinking, V.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tennemann, W. G. (1798–1819), Geschichte der Philosophie, 12 Bde. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, D. (1791–97), Geist der spekulativen Philosophie, 6 Bde. Marburg: Akademische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Ventura, L. (2014), ‘The Abstract God and the Role of the Finite: Hegel's View of the Islamic Absolute’, Jahrbuch für Hegel-Forschung 15–17: 117–34.Google Scholar
Ventura, L. (2015), ‘The View of Islam in Hegel's Berlin Lectures: Ever-Increasing Information and the Search for a Comprehensive Theory’, Hegel-Jahrbuch: Proceedings of the XXIX International Hegel Congress (Istanbul 3–6 October 2012) 1: 66–70.Google Scholar