Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:03:41.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Being in Hegel and Heidegger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2017

Andrew Haas
Andrew Haas*
Affiliation:
Higher School of Economics, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

What is being? This is, from the Greeks to Hegel (according to Heidegger), the guiding question of ontology and the history of philosophy as metaphysics. And the answer is presence: ‘being’ means ‘being present’, ‘presencing’; ‘to be’ means ‘to be present’. By clarifying the limit of this philosophy of presence, however, it is possible to go beyond it, to a thinking of being as presence and absence—for both coming-to-presence and going-out-into-absence are ways in which beings are, and being happens. And yet, are presence and absence the only ways to think being? On the contrary—there is a third. From the Greeks (through Hegel) to Heidegger, the being that fails to come to presence, but also does not simply remain in absence—this is what is merely implied, an implication. But then what does it mean to think being as implied? Being as implying? As an implication?

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 38 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Phenomenology , May 2017 , pp. 150 - 170
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aeschylus (1973), Septem Quae Supersunt Tragoedias. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Allison, D. (2005), ‘Derrida’s Critique of Husserl and the Philosophy of Presence’, Veritas 50:1: 89–99.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1950), Physica, ed. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1957), Metaphysica, ed. W. Jaeger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Badiou, A. (1988), L’être et l’événement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1991), Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. (2003), ‘Heidegger’s Heritage.’ Revista Portugesa de Filosofia 59: 991–9998.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1972), ‘Ousia et grammè: note sur une note de Sein und Zeit’, in Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2001), L’Université sans condition. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2003), Voyous. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1960), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, vol. 1. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Dostoyevski, F. M. (1864), Записки из подполья. St. Petersburg: Epocha.Google Scholar
Dostoyevski, F. M. (1993), Notes from Underground, trans. R. Pevear and L. Volokhonsky. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (1997), ‘The Bacchanalian Revel: Hegel and Deconstruction’, Man and World 30: 217–226.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (2000), Hegel and the Problem of Multiplicity. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (2007), ‘Being and Implication: On Hegel and the Greeks’, Cosmos and History 3:3: 192–210.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (2015a), ‘Notes on Time and Aspect’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22:2: 504–517.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (2015b), ‘What is a Problem?’ Horizon: Studies in Phenomenology 4:2: 71–86.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1957), Identität und Differenz. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (2001), ‘Hegel und das Problem der Metaphysik’, in H. France-Lanord and F. Midal (eds.), La fête de la pensée. Paris: Lettrage.Google Scholar
Homer (1920), Homera Operi: Iliad. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Homer (1922), Homera Operi: Odyssey. Vol. IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (1979), The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. (2003), The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1900), Gesammelte Schriften (Akademie Ausgabe). Berlin: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Keats, J. (1814–91), Transcripts of Unpublished Poems. Boston: Houghton Library, Harvard University.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (1996), A Presocratics Reader. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Olafson, F. (1993), ‘The Unity of Heidegger’s Thought’, in C. B. Guignon (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plato (1922), Platonis Opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sophocles (1990), Fabulae. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar