Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:47:04.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kierkegaard's Recurring Criticism of Hegel's ‘The Good and Conscience’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart*
Affiliation:
Søren Kierkegaard Research Centre, Copenhagen University
Get access

Abstract

Kierkegaard was, at least during his early years, an avid reader of Hegel's philosophy. For example, his dissertation, The Concept of Irony, constitutes a careful study of, among other things, Hegel's account of Socrates in the Lectures on the History of Philosophy, and of Hegel's discussion of Romantic irony in both the Lectures on Aesthetics and the book review of Solger's Posthumous Writings. Similarly, in connection with the analysis of Antigone in Either/Or and the discussion of universals and particulars in the unfinished Johannes Climacus or De Omnibus dubitandum est, Part Two, there is clear evidence that Kierkegaard consulted the relevant parts of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Based on these examples, Kierkegaard's use of Hegel can almost always be characterised as ad hoc. He goes directly to specific passages or discussions in Hegel's texts, which are of special interest in connection with works that he himself is writing. Thus, when working on The Concept of Irony, the first part of which is concerned with Socratic irony, Kierkegaard goes specifically to the section in Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy that treats Socrates, without feeling any obligation to read the book from cover to cover.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 28 , Issue 1-2: number 55/56 , 2007 , pp. 45 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grégoire, Franz (1996), ‘The “Divinity” of the State in Hegel,’ in Steward, Jon ed., The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 289–300.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1840), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, 2nd ed., Hegel, Karl ed., vol. 9 in Boumann, Ludwig et al. eds., Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's Werke. Vollständige Ausgabe, vols. 1–18. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot 1832–45.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1998), Lectures on Fine Art, [1975] vols. 1–2, trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2002), ‘Review of Solger's Posthumous Writings and Correspondence’, trans., Behler, Diana I., in Stewart, Jon ed., Miscellaneous Writings of G.W.F. Hegel. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 354–400.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1985), Philosophical Fragments. Johannes Climacus, or De omnibus dubitandum est, trans., Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press Google Scholar
Solger, Posthumous Writings.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (1998), ‘Hegel's View of Moral Conscience and Kierkegaard's Interpretation of Abraham,’ Kierkegaardiana, vol. 19: 58–80.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (1999), ‘Kierkegaard and Hegel on Faith and Politics,’ Kierkegaardiana, vol. 20: 251–4.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon (2003), Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar