Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:10:44.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel's Contradictions1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Ralph Palm
Ralph Palm*
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Perhaps one of the most difficult passages in Hegel's Science of Logic is his treatment of contradiction. If each moment of Hegel's logic is understood to constitute a sort of proof and since contradiction itself is presented as a moment of the logic, then in what sense can one comprehend a proof of contradiction as such? It is difficult to formulate this in any way that does not sound fundamentally incoherent, since it is not just at odds with our ordinary way of thinking but also with the overwhelming majority of the Western philosophical tradition. The basic problem, essentially, is this: if Hegel's logic includes contradiction as one of its moments, then how is Hegel's entire philosophical project not simply incoherent?

In the first part of this article, I will attempt to demonstrate one way in which Hegel's treatment of contradiction could in fact be considered coherent, through a close reading of the relevant passages. In this reading, I will particularly focus on the function of Hegel's dialectical concept of sublation (aufheben), and attempt to show (by example) how analysing Hegel's nuanced use of sublation can help us to work through some of his logic's complexities. The overall purpose here will be to present a systematic (as opposed to historical) exposition of Hegel's concept of contradiction and to illustrate the important role that this concept (as the contradiction of contradiction) plays in Hegel's logical method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 32 , Special Issue 1-2: Special Issue on Kant and Hegel , 2011 , pp. 134 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Abbreviation:

SL: Hegel (1999).

HW: Hegel (1970); page numbers follow volume number.

References

Bole, T. (1987), ‘Contradiction in Hegel's Science of Logic ?’, Review of Metaphysics 40: 515–534.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Boer, K. (2010), ‘Hegel's Account of Contradiction in the Science of Logic Reconsidered’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 48(3): 345–373.10.1353/hph.0.0231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulckeit, K. (1989), ‘Hegel's Revenge on Russell: The “Is” of Identity versus the “Is” of Predication’ in Desmond, W. (ed.), Hegel and his Critics: Philosophy in the Aftermath of Hegel. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. N. (1958), Hegel: A Re-Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, M. (1989), Hegel and Skepticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, S. S. (2007), Contraction in Motion: Hegel's Organic Concept of Life and Value. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999), Hegel's Science of Logic. Trans. Miller, A. V.. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995), Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3. Trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simpson, F. H.. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopaedia Logic: Part I of the Encyclopaedia of Philosophical Sciences with the Zusätze. Trans. Geraets, T. F., Suchting, W. A. and Harris, H. S.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970), Werke in 20 Bänden. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. Accessed via the Talpa-Verlag Werke auf CD-ROM version of this edition.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1965), ‘Who Thinks Abstractly?’ Trans. Kaufmann, W. in Kaufmann, W. (ed.), Hegel: Reinterpretation, Texts, and Commentary. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (2003), ‘The Logic of Negation and its Application’. Trans. Pacini, D. S. in Pacini, D. S., Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2009), ‘Phenomenology and De Re Interpretation: A Critique of Brandom's Reading of Hegel’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17(1): 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, M. (1992), A Hegel Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. (1965), Hegel: A Reinterpretation. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, G. (1958), ‘The Hegel Legend of “Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis”’, Journal of the Hegel's Contradictions History of Ideas 19: 411–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in Stewart, J. (ed.) (1996), The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, J. L. (2002), Hegel: the Restlessness of the Negative. Trans. Smith, J. and Miller, S., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (1978), ‘Hegel's Metaphysics and the Problem of Contradiction’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 16: 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in Stewart, J. (ed.) (1996), The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (1990), ‘The Method of Hegel's Science of Logic’ in di Giovanni, G. (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Logic. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (1999), ‘On Hegel's Doctrine of Contradiction’. Trans. Flynn, E. and Westphal, K., Owl of Minerva 31(1): 1–22.Google Scholar