Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:43:11.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegelianism in Slovenia: A Short Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Boris Vezjak
Boris Vezjak*
Affiliation:
University of Maribor
Get access

Abstract

My modest aim and scope in this article is to outline the present philosophical situation in Slovenia, inasmuch as it is linked with the development of Hegelian thought and influenced by the work of Hegel. I will briefly discuss some historical characteristics of its origin, with no attempt to depict “ethnographic” features of it or to show its ideological basis. Later on I will introduce some aspects of Hegel's philosophy, as understood by Slovenian lacaniens, trying to summarize their reading of Hegel and consequently point out how deeply their work on Lacan is inspired by him. My hidden and not explicitly discussed assumption throughout this paper will be that their research, although manifestly concerned with Lacan, is for the most part inspired by Hegel, and therefore Slovenian Lacanians are actually Hegelians. I will, however, try to avoid disputing and making comments on the main views of their orientation and how they concur with Hegel — this would require an extra space for comparison of both standpoints and be too complicated hermeneutically.

Slovenia, which used to be a part of Yugoslavia, grew up in a-rigorous tradition of communist thinking with Marxism as a systematical ideological basis. This happened in almost all Eastern European countries, which shared the same destiny till the fall of the Berlin wall.

The ideological restrictions behind the so-called “iron curtain”, so typical and easily recognizable within all these countries, caused a total eclipse of almost every non-Marxist philosophy in Slovenia up to the sixties.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 17 , Issue 2: number 34 , Autumn/Winter 1996 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zizek, Slavoj, Hegel and the signifier: An attempt of ‘the materialistic turn’ of Hegel in the contemporary psychoanalytic theory and its meaning for the historical materialism (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1980) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
2 Mocnik, Rastko & Zizek, Slavoj, Psychoanalysis and culture (Ljubljana, Drzavna zalozba Slovenije, 1981) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
3 Zizek, Slavoj, History and the unconscious (Ljubljana, Cankarjeva zalozba, 1982) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
4 Zizek, Slavoj, Philosophy through psychoanalysis (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1984) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
5 Zizek, Slavoj & Dolar, Mladen, Hegel and the object (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1985) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
6 Dolar, Mladen, Schelling's philosophical development, in: F W J Schelling: Collected works (Ljubljana, Slovenska Matica, 1986), pp 349–386 (in Slovene).Google Scholar
7 Riha, Rado & Zizek, Slavoj, Problems of the fetishism theory (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1985) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
8 Kobe, Zdravko, Being and reflection, in: Desire and guilt (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1988), pp 125–176 (in Slovene).Google Scholar
9 Zizek, Slavoj, The sublime object of ideology (London-New York, Verso, 1989).Google Scholar
10 Dolar, Mladen, Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit I (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1990) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
11 Zupancic, Alenka, Das Unheimliche in Kant's theory of law, Ljubljana, Filozofski vestnik 11, 1990), pp 39–47 (in Slovene).Google Scholar
12 Zizek, Slavoj (editor), Geslalten der Autorilaet: Seminar der Laibacher Lacan-Schule, Wien: Hora, 1991.Google Scholar
13 Zizek, Slavoj, Looking awry: an introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture (Cambridge, London, The MIT Press, 1991).Google Scholar
14 Zizek, Slavoj, Kant: the subject out of joint (Ljubljana, Filozofski vestnik 13, 1992), pp 233–248.Google Scholar
15 Zizek, Slavoj, Der erhabenster aller Hysteriker: Psychoanalyse und die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus (Wien-Berlin, Turia & Kant, 1992).Google Scholar
16 Zupancic, Alenka, On the beautiful in Kant, in: God, Teacher, Master, (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1991), pp 147–159 (in Slovene).Google Scholar
17 Zizek, Slavoj, For they know not what they do: enjoyment as a political factor (London-New York, Verso, 1991).Google Scholar
18 Kobe, Zdravko, Das Problem des inneren Sinnes: Das Innere, das Aussere, und die Apperzeption (Ljubljana, Filozofski vestnik, 1992), pp 79–96.Google Scholar
19 Zizek, Slavoj, Enjoy your symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and out (New York-London, Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
20 Dolar, Mladen, Selfconsciousness. Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit II (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1992) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
21 Zizek, Slavoj, L'intraitable: psychanalyse, polilique et culture de masse (Paris, Anthropos, 1993).Google Scholar
22 Zupancic, Alenka, Ethics of the Real: Kant, Lacan (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1993) (in Slovene).Google Scholar
23 Kobe, Zdravko, The place of the unconscious within transcendental idealism (Ljubljana, Problemi-Razprave, 1993), pp 149–224 (in Slovene).Google Scholar
24 Zizek, Slavoj, Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology (Durham, Duke University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
25 Zupancic, Alenka, Kant and the paradox of “inner lie”, (Ljubljana, Problemi, 1994), pp 257–268 (in Slovene).Google Scholar
26 Kobe, Zdravko, Automaton transcendentale I: Kant's way to Kant (Ljubljana, Analecta, 1995) (in Slovene).Google Scholar