Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:18:13.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expressive Embodiment: Hegel, Habitual Agency and the Shortcomings of Normative Expressivism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2020

Italo Testa
Italo Testa*
Affiliation:
University of Parma, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper I tackle the normative re-appropriation of the legacy of Charles Taylor's expressivist understanding of Hegel's theory of action. I argue that a normative understanding of Hegel's expressivist notion of agency by interpreters such as Robert Pippin, Terry Pinkard, Michael Quante and Robert Brandom, has been obtained at the price of losing sight of the principle of embodiment and of its relevance for our and Hegel's understanding of social action. I aim at relocating Hegel's notion of expressive embodiment at the core of his explanation of action. Rather than following Taylor's hermeneutical reconstruction of the principle of embodiment, I try to reconstruct it by putting at its core the notion of habit formation with the help of conceptual tools taken from contemporary embodied cognition approaches. I first discuss the Anthropology and argue that habit, understood as a sensorimotor embodied life form, is not only an enabling condition for agency, but in fact an ontological constitutive condition for all its levels of manifestation. According to this reading, the Hegelian approach to embodiment offers a model that not only assigns to habit a positive constitutive role in the formation of human mindedness, but also overcomes the dualism between habitual motor routine and intentional activities. If we approach Hegel's understanding of agency from this vantage point, we can gain a perspective which allows us to appreciate a naturalist strand of Hegel's expressivism about action and to free it from certain basic anti-naturalistic assumptions of contemporary normative expressivist interpretations of Hegel on social action.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1: Naturalism and Sociality , April 2021 , pp. 114 - 132
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barandiaran, X. E. and Di Paolo, E. A. (2014), ‘A Genealogical Map of the Concept of Habit’, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:522: 22–28. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, S. (2015), ‘Normativity and Expressive Agency in Hegel, Nietzsche, and Deleuze’, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29:2: 236–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, M. (2012), ‘Essentially Rational Animals’, in Abel, G. and Conant, J. (eds.), Rethinking Epistemology. Berlin: Walter de Grutyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. (2016), ‘Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique’, European Journal of Philosophy 23:4: 527–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (2019), A Spirit of Trust: A Reading of Hegel's Phenomenology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, C. (1986), ‘The Matter of Habit’, American Journal of Sociology 9: 1039–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1973), ‘Freedom to Act’, in Honderich, T. (ed.), Essays on Freedom of Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. (1982), ‘Reconstruction in Philosophy’, in J. A. Boydston (ed.), The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, vol. 12: 1920, Essays, Miscellany, and Reconstruction in Philosophy. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 77–202.Google Scholar
Gleeson, L. (2018), ‘An Evaluative Essentialist and Holistic Reading of Hegelian Concrete Freedom in Outline: Contra Pippin’, Hegel Jahrbuch 11:1: 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, D. (2010), ‘Hegel on Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds.), Hegel on Action. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A., and Sandis, C. (2010), Hegel on Action. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (2015), ‘Hegel, Dewey and Habits’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23:4: 632–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, S. (2013), ‘Between Nature and Spirit: Hegel's Account of Habit’, in Stern, D. S. (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Menke, C. (2013), ‘Hegel's Theory of Second Nature: The “Lapse” of Spirit’, Symposium. Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 17:1: 31–49.Google Scholar
Ng, K. (2016), ‘Life and Mind in Hegel's Logic and Subjective Spirit’, Hegel Bulletin 37:2: 23–44.Google Scholar
Novakovic, A. (2017), Hegel on Second Nature in Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novakovic, A. (2019), ‘Hegel's Real Habits’, European Journal of Philosophy https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2012), Hegel's Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2010), ‘Hegel's Social Theory of Agency: The “Inner-Outer” Problem’, in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds.), Hegel on Action. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A., Sabb, F. W., Foerde, K., Tom, S. M., Asarnow, R. F., Bookheimer, S. Y., and Knowlton, B. J. (2005), ‘The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill. Automaticity’, Journal of Neuroscience 25:22: 5356–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, B. (2006), ‘Explaining Actions with Habits’, American Philosophical Quarterly 43: 57–68.Google Scholar
Quante, M. (2004), Hegel's Concept of Action, trans. Moyar, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranchio, F. (2016), Dimensionen der zweiten Natur: Hegels praktische Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Särkelä, A. (2018), Immanente Kritik und soziales Leben: Selbsttransformative Praxis nach Hegel und Dewey. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2010), Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1983/2010), ‘Hegel and the Philosophy of Action’, in Stepelevich, L. S. and Lamb, D. (eds.), Hegel's Philosophy of Action. Atlantic Highlands N.J.: Humanities Press. Reprinted in A. Laitinen and C. Sandis (eds.), Hegel on Action. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Testa, I. (2009), ‘Second Nature and Recognition. Hegel and the Social Space’, Critical Horizons 10:3: 341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, I. (2020), ‘A Habit Ontology for Cognitive and Social Sciences: Methodological Individualism, Pragmatist Interactionism, and 4E Cognition’, in Caruana, F. and Testa, I. (eds.), Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Testa, I., and Caruana, F. (2020), ‘The Pragmatist Reappraisal of Habit in Contemporary Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory’, in Caruana, F. and Testa, I. (eds.), Habits: Pragmatist Approaches from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar