Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:11:25.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dieter Henrich, Aesthetic Judgment And The Moral Image Of The World, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992, pp 99, Hb £22.95

Review products

Dieter Henrich, Aesthetic Judgment And The Moral Image Of The World, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992, pp 99, Hb £22.95

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Ståle R S Finke
Ståle R S Finke*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 16 , Issue 2: number 32 , Autumn/Winter 1995 , pp. 24 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For the notion of philosophy as integration and critique, see Henrich, D, Flucht Linien, Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a m, 1982, pp 125–134 Google Scholar.

2 For a detailed account of the place of self-consciousness in Kant's critical philosophy, see Henrich, D, Identität und Objektivität, Carl Winter Verlag: Heidelberg, 1976 Google Scholar; “The Identity of the Subject in Kant's Transcendental Deduction”, in Shaper, /Vossenkuhl, eds: Reading Kant, Basil Blackwell: Oxford, 1989 Google Scholar.

3 Kant, , Critique of Judgment (1790)Google Scholar. Translated by W S Pluhar, Hackett Publishing Company: Indianapolis, 1987, p 15.

4 This was also certainly Kant's view. See Kant (1790), and in particular sections 9 and 38.

5 The systematic relation of early romaticism, and Hölderlin in particular, to Kant's third Critique is explored by Henrich, in his Der Grund im Bewusstsein, Klett-Cotta: Stuttgart, 1992 Google Scholar.

6 Henrich has argued this point more extensively, formulated as a critique of Habermas, Jürgen, in his Konzepte. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a m, 1987, p 11 ffGoogle Scholar.