Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T22:41:30.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Christoph Jamme, ‘Ein ungeiehrtes Buch’: Die philosophische Gemeinschaft zwischen Hölderlin und Hegel in Frankfurt 1797-1800. Bonn, Bouvier Verlag, 1983, pp. 430.

Review products

Christoph Jamme, ‘Ein ungeiehrtes Buch’: Die philosophische Gemeinschaft zwischen Hölderlin und Hegel in Frankfurt 1797-1800. Bonn, Bouvier Verlag, 1983, pp. 430.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

D.L. Simpson
D.L. Simpson*
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Munster
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 6 , Issue 1: number 11 , Spring/Summer 1985 , pp. 19 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. On this subject, see the discussion in Dinkel, Bernhard, Per junge Hegel und die Aufhebung des Subjektiven Idealismus (Bonn, 1974), pp. 153–9Google Scholar.

2. Hegelstudien 8 (1973), p.24 Google Scholar, in his essay on ‘Sinclair-Hölderlin-Hegel’.

3. Hölderlinjahrbuch 21 (1978–1979), p.134 Google Scholar, in his essay on ‘Hölderlin's “Hyperion”’.

4. Following Hirsch, E., Die Beisetzung der Romantiker in Hegels Phanomenologie, in ‘Materialien zu Hegels “Phänomenologie des Geistes”, ed. Fulda, H.F. and Henrich, D. (Frankfurt a.M., 1973), pp.245–275 Google Scholar.

5. See, in particular, p.375.

6. The ‘resolution of dissonances’ occurs under the aegis of Love. It cannot bepermanent, since Strife must return, but it is nevertheless a ‘resolution’, however temporary. Unlike Hegel, for whom Strife and Evil are aufgehoben in the upward progress of Geist, and Heidegger, for whom Heraclitus' polemos and logos were the same and strife actually a unifying force (cf. Einführung in die Metaphysik). Hölderlin was not reconciled to the concept of Evil. The ‘mediation’ in his work is between mankind and Love/the Good (Plato's to kalon).