Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:36:10.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artisans, Artists and Hegel's History of Art*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2013

Allen Speight
Allen Speight*
Affiliation:
Department of PhilosophyBoston [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article examines Hegel's use of the distinction between ‘artist’ (Künstler) and ‘artisan’ (Werkmeister) in light of recent discussion about the ‘end’ of art and the distinction betweeen art and craft that, as some have argued, has been central to the concept of the fine arts since the eighteenth century. Hegel does employ an important distinction between artist and artisan, but he does so within a larger account of the continuum of forms of human making that can take into consideration the importance of the artisan's work as well as the artist's. Hegel's account involves two distinctive features not always at issue in the artist/artisan distinction: the stress on the social changes required for new forms of art to emerge and an embrace of the human being as the essentially retrospective and interpretive animal in whom the decisive intersection of content and form finally makes art what it is.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , October 2013 , pp. 203 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the meeting of the Hegel Society of Great Britain at Magdalene College Cambridge in September 2012. I am grateful to the participants in those meetings for numerous points of discussion, and particularly to Stephen Houlgate, Dan Dahlstrom, Alison Stone, Katerina Deligiorgi and Joshua Billings for additional suggestions and queries.

References

Belting, H. (2003), Art History after Modernism, trans. Caroline Saltzwedel and Mitch Cohen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1998), After the End of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donougho, M. (2007), ‘Must It Be Abstract? Hegel, Pippin, And Clarke’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 55/6 87-106.Google Scholar
Gaiger, J. (2006), ‘Catching up with history: Hegel and abstract painting’, in Katerina Deligiorgi (ed.), Hegel: New Directions. McGill Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. (1983), ‘Response to Paul de Man’. Critical Inquiry 10(2), 375-382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, K. (1973-74), ‘Hegel on the Future of Art’. Review of Metaphysics 27: 677-696.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (1975), Hegel's Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Arts, I.7, trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (1997), ‘Hegel and the ‘End’ of Art’. Owl of Minerva 29(1), 1-22.Google Scholar
Kivy, P. (2012), ‘What Really Happened in the Eighteenth Century: The “Modern System” Re-examined (Again)’. British Journal of Aesthetics 52(1), 61-74.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1951), ‘The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics’. Journal of the History of Ideas 12(4), 496-527.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1952), ‘The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics’. Journal of the History of Ideas 13(1), 17-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moldenhauer, E.Michel, K. M. (eds.) (1970), G. W. F. Hegel: Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1954), Thus Spake Zarathustra, trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Oelmüller, W. (1965), ‘Hegels Satz vom Ende der Kunst’. Philosophische Jahrbuch 73: 75-94.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2002), ‘What Was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel)’. Critical Inquiry 29.1.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2009), ‘The Absence of Aesthetics in Hegel's Aesthetics’, in Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2009), ‘Is Art Modern? Kristeller's “Modern System of the Arts” Reconsidered’. British Journal of Aesthetics 49: 1-24.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010), The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, O. (1980), ‘Die Entstehung von Hegels Ästhetik in Jena’, in Dieter Henrich and Klaus Düsing (eds.), Hegel in Jena: Die Entwicklung des Systems und die Zusammenarbeit mit Schelling. Hegel Studien (Beiheft 20), Bonn: Bouvier, 249-270.Google Scholar
Quante, M. (2004), Hegel's Concept of Action, trans. Dean Moyar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, A. (2007), ‘Nietzsche on Art and Freedom’. European Journal of Philosophy 15(2), 204-224.Google Scholar
Ridley, A. (2009), ‘Nietzsche's Intentions: What the Sovereign Individual Promises’, in Ken Gemes and Simon May (eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jr.Rush, F. L. (1998), ‘Hegel's Conception of the End of Art’. Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutter, B. (2010), Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandis, C. (2010), ‘The Man Who Mistook His Handlung for a Tat: Hegel on Oedipus and Other Tragic Agents’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 62: 35-60.Google Scholar
Shiner, L. (2001), The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Speight, A. (2011), ‘Hegel and the “Historical Deduction” of the Concept of Art’, in Stephen Houlgate and Michael Baur (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Speight, A.(forthcoming), ‘Two Claims of Unity in Hegel's Philosophy of Art’, in Michael Baur (ed.), Hegel: Key Concepts. Durham: AcumenGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, C. (2012), Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar