Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:19:35.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aristotelian Theos in Hegel's Philosophy of Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2019

Ermylos Plevrakis
Ermylos Plevrakis*
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Although Hegel does not pass up the opportunity to express his deep admiration for specific aspects of the Aristotelian notion of God, he is not interested in giving a concrete account of its systematic significance for his Philosophy of Mind as a whole. In this article, I seek to take an overarching perspective on both the Aristotelian God and the Hegelian mind. By contrast to the common practice of focusing on Hegel's interpretation of Aristotle in his Lectures on the History of Philosophy, I first examine the Aristotelian text itself and then focus on Hegel's Encyclopaedia Philosophy of Mind, in order to explore the coincidence between the two conceptions from a systematic point of view. With regard to Aristotle, I argue that ‘God’ represents the conceptual vanishing point of his philosophy at which all philosophical sciences appear to converge. With regard to Hegel, I show that it is precisely such conceptual convergence of all philosophical sciences that constitutes both the starting and ending points of the Philosophy of Mind. The result is a novel meta-scientific and non-theistic conception of ‘God’ that provides the means not only to re-evaluate the systematic relation between Hegel and Aristotle but also to reconsider the character, content and aim of speculative philosophy in general.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 41 , Special Issue 1: Hegel and Aristotle on the Metaphysics of Mind , April 2020 , pp. 83 - 101
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anton, J. P. (1990), ‘The Unity of Scientific Inquiry and Categorial Theory in Aristotle’, in Nicolacopoulos, P. (ed.), Greek Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. T. (1961), Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics, trans. Rowan, J. P.. Notre Dame IN: Dumb Ox Books.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1926–2011), Loeb Classical Library, ed. Henderson, J.. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2008), Aristotle's Divine Intellect. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Busche, H. (2001), Die Seele als System: Aristoteles’ Wissenschaft von der Psyche. Hamburg: Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2559-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busche, H. (2018), ‘Geist bei Aristoteles: Eine systematische Skizze’, in Busche, H. and Perkams, M. (eds.), Antike Interpretationen zur aristotelischen Lehre vom Geist. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Caston, V. (1999), ‘Aristotle's Two Intellects: A Modest Proposal’, Phronesis 44: 199–227.10.1163/15685289960500033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dangel, T. (2013), Hegel und die Geistmetaphysik des Aristoteles. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110313765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düsing, K. (1976), Das Problem der Subjektivität in Hegels Logik: Systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Prinzip des Idealismus und zur Dialektik. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar
Düsing, K. (1983), Hegel und die Geschichte der Philosophie: Ontologie und Dialektik in Antike und Neuzeit. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Ferrarin, A. (2001), Hegel and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (1975), Das Problem einer Einleitung in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (2001), ‘Hegels Begriff des Absoluten Geistes’, Hegel-Studien 36: 171–98.Google Scholar
Fulda, H. F. (2004), ‘Der letzte Paragraph der Hegelschen “Enzyclopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften”’, in Lucas, H-C. (ed.), Hegels enzyklopädisches System der Philosophie: Von der Wissenschaft der Logik zur Philosophie des absoluten Geistes. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
German, A. R. (2018), ‘Mens Divina as Lebendigkeit. Hegel's Interpretation of Met. 1072b24–25’, in Magee, G. A. (ed.), Hegel and Ancient Philosophy: A Re-Examination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartmann, N. (1957), ‘Aristoteles und Hegel’, in Hartmann, N. (ed.), Kleinere Schriften, Bd. 2. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, W. (2010), Hegel Handbuch: Leben—Werk—Schule. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-00502-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, H. (1969), ‘Grundfragen der aristotelischen Theologie’, in Theologie und Philosophie 44: 363–82; 481–505.Google Scholar
Laurentiis, A. de (2018), ‘The Aristotelian Metaphysics of Hegel's “Soul”’, in Magee, G. A. (ed.), Hegel and Ancient Philosophy: A Re-Examination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liatsi, M. (2016), ‘Aristotle's Silence about the Prime Mover's Noesis’, in Horn, C. (ed.), Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda: New Essays. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ng, K. (2018), ‘Life and Mind in Hegel's Logic and Subjective Spirit’, Hegel Bulletin 39: 23–44.10.1017/hgl.2016.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2013), ‘Anthropology, Geist, and the Soul-Body Relation: The Systematic Beginning of Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit’, in Stern, D. S. (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Oehler, K. (1984), Der Unbewegte Beweger des Aristoteles. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.10.3196/9783465016403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperzak, A. (1987), Selbsterkenntnis des Absoluten, Grundlinien der Hegelschen Philosophie des Geistes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Plevrakis, E. (2017), Das Absolute und der Begriff: Zur Frage philosophischer Theologie in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quante, M. (2011), Die Wirklichkeit des Geistes: Studien zu Hegel. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stein, S. (2018), ‘Die spekulative Einheit von Geist und Natur: Hegels absoluter Idealismus als Selbstwissen der ontologischen Vernunft’, in Forster, M. et al. (eds.), Idealismus und Romantik in Jena: Figuren und Konzepte zwischen 1794 und 1804. Paderborn: Fink.Google Scholar
Weiss, F. G. (1969), Hegel's Critique of Aristotle's Philosophy of Mind. The Hague: Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-015-0670-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar