Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:03:02.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brandom vs. Hegel: The Relation of Normativity and Recognition to the True Infinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2015

Alper Turken
Alper Turken*
Affiliation:
Bogazici [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Robert Brandom's neo-pragmatist interpretation of Hegel suggests that Hegel understands normative statuses, and therefore all conceptual commitments, as social achievements based on reciprocal recognition. This is expressed in the slogan ‘For Hegel, all transcendental constitution is social institution.’1 An important problem with this interpretation lies in its oversight that Hegel's concept of true infinite is presupposed and operative in Hegel's account of recognition in Phenomenology. This paper argues that Hegel's theory of recognition in the Phenomenology is based on his logical concepts and therefore cannot institute them.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 36 , Special Issue 2: Pragmatism , October 2015 , pp. 225 - 247
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brandom, R. (1998), Making It Explicit. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (1999), ‘Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel's Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel's Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms’, European Journal of Philosophy 7(2), 164-189.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2001), Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2002), Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2009), Reason in Philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2014), ‘Some Hegelian Ideas of Note for Contemporary Analytic Philosophy’, Hegel Bulletin 35(1), 1-15.Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2006), Hegel New Directions. Trowbridge: Cromwell Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1923), ‘The Ego and Id’, in A. Freud (ed.) and J. Stratchey (trans.), The Essentials of Psycho-Analysis. London: Vintage Books, 439-483.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1988), Introduction to the Philosophy of History. trans. L. Rauch. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), The Encyclopedia Logic, trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004), Hegel's Philosophy of Nature, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford, New York, Toronto, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008), The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. T. Pinkard.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010), The Science of Logic, trans. A. and G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horstmann, R. P. (2006a), ‘Substance, Subject and Infinity: a case study of the role of logic in Hegel's system’, in Hegel New Directions, ed. K. Deligiorgi. Trowbridge: Cromwell Press, 69-84.Google Scholar
Horstmann, R. P. (2006b), ‘Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit as an Argument for a Monistic Ontology’, Inquiry 49: 103-118.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel's Logic. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (2003), Pragmatism. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1971), The Psychological Types, ed. R. F. C. Hull, trans. H. G. Baynes. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malabou, C. (2004), The Future of Hegel; Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2003), Mind and World. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (2003), ‘Some American Uses of Hegel’, in W. Welsch and K. Vieweg (eds.), Das Interesse des Denkens Hegel aus heutiger Sicht. Indianapolis, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 33-46.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1956), Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Welsch, W.Vieweg, K. (eds.) (2003), Das Interesse des Denkens Hegel aus heutiger Sicht. Indianapolis, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar