Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:45:38.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valuing health properly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2008

DANIEL M. HAUSMAN
DANIEL M. HAUSMAN*
Affiliation:
Herbert A. Simon Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
*
*Correspondence to: Professor Daniel M. Hausman, Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, Helen C. White Hall, 600 North Park Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This comment on Paul Dolan's essay, ‘Developing methods that really do value the “Q” in the QALY,’ seconds his critique of current preference-based methods of valuing health states but disputes both his assumption that health states should be appraised by their bearing on well-being and his conclusion that the bearing of health states on well-being should be measured in terms of subjective experience. This comment defends instead the view that health states should be valued in terms of the range of activities that they permit.

Type
Response
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dolan, P. and Kahneman, D. (2008), ‘Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health’, Economic Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. (2006), ‘Valuing health’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 34: 246–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahenman, D. (2000), ‘Experienced utility and objective happiness: a moment-based approach’, in Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (eds), Choices, Values and Frames, New York: Cambridge University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, Chapter 37, pp. 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, D. and Erickson, P. (1993), Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar