Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:47:09.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gaining pounds by losing pounds: preferences for lifestyle interventions to reduce obesity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2014

Mandy Ryan ,
Deokhee Yi ,
Alison Avenell ,
Flora Douglas ,
Lorna Aucott ,
Edwin van Teijlingen  and
Luke Vale
Mandy Ryan*
Affiliation:
Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
Deokhee Yi
Affiliation:
Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
Alison Avenell
Affiliation:
Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
Flora Douglas
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
Lorna Aucott
Affiliation:
Medical Statistics Team, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK
Edwin van Teijlingen
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, UK
Luke Vale
Affiliation:
Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Mandy Ryan, Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2QN, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While there is evidence that weight-loss interventions reduce morbidity, indications of their acceptability are limited. Understanding preferences for lifestyle interventions will help policymakers design interventions. We used a discrete choice experiment to investigate preferences for lifestyle interventions to reduce adult obesity. Attributes focused on: the components of the programme; weight change; short-term and longer-term health gains; time spent on the intervention and financial costs incurred. Data were collected through a web-based questionnaire, with 504 UK adults responding. Despite evidence that dietary interventions are the most effective way to lose weight, respondents preferred lifestyle interventions involving physical activity. While the evidence suggests that behaviour change support improves effectiveness of interventions, its value to participants was limited. A general preference to maintain current lifestyles, together with the sensitivity of take up to financial costs, suggests financial incentives could be used to help maximise uptake of healthy lifestyle interventions. An important target group for change, men, required more compensation to take up healthier lifestyles. Those of normal weight, who will increase in weight over time if they do not change their lifestyle, required the highest compensation. Policymakers face challenges in inducing people to change their behaviour and adopt healthy lifestyles.

Type
Articles
Information
Health Economics, Policy and Law , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 161 - 182
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aucott, J. (2008), ‘Influences of weight loss on long-term diabetes outcomes’, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 67: 54–59.Google Scholar
Aucott, L. S., Gray, D., Rothnie, H., Thapa, M. and Waweru, C. (2011), ‘Effects of lifestyle interventions and long-term weight loss on lipid outcomes – a systematic review’, Obesity Review, 12(5): 412–425.Google Scholar
Aucott, L. S., Poobalan, A. S., Smith, W. C. S., Avenell, A., Jung, R. and Broom, J. (2005), ‘Effects of weight loss in overweight/obese individuals and long-term hypertension outcomes: a systematic review’, Hypertension, 45(6): 1035–1041.Google Scholar
Aucott, L. S., Rothnie, H., McIntyre, L., Thapa, M.Waweru, C. and Gray, D. (2009), ‘Long-term weight loss from lifestyle intervention benefits blood pressure? A systematic review’, Hypertension, 54(4): 756–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avenell, A., Broom, J., Brown, T. J., Poobalan, A., Aucott, L.Stearns, S. C., Smith, W. C. S., Jung, R. T., Campbell, M. K. and Grant, A. M. (2004), ‘Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement’, Health Technology Assessment, 8(21): 1–182.Google Scholar
Bird, C. E. and Reiker, P. P. (2008), National Social Policies and Constrained Choice in Gender and Health: The Effects of Constrained Choices and Social Policies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Avenell, A., Edmunds, E., Moore, H.Whittaker, V., Avery, L., Summerbell, C., and the PROGRESS group (2009), ‘Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent obesity in adults’, Obesity Review, 10(6): 627–638.Google Scholar
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Ryan, R. and Gerard, K. (2012), ‘Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature’, Health Economics, 21: 145–172.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C., Mason, H. and Shackley, P. (2012), ‘Contingent Valuation in Health Care’, in A. M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Douglas, F., Greener, J. and van Teijlingen, E. (2008), ‘‘Ask ME Why I’m Fat!’ The need to engage with potential recipients of health promotion policy to prevent obesity’, Australian Economic Review, 41(1): 72–77.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. J., Roberts, I. G., Clarke, M. J., DiGuiseppi, C., Wentz, R., Kwan, I., Cooper, R., Felix, L. and Pratap, S. (2007), ‘Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires’, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2: MR000008.Google Scholar
Foresight (2007), Tackling obesities: future choices – project report, London: The Stationery Office, 2007. http://www.foresight.gov.uk/Obesity/obesity_final/Index.html [11 October 2014].Google Scholar
Green, J. and Tones, K. (2010), Health Promotion: Planning and Strategies, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Greener, J., Douglas, F. and van Teijlingen, E. (2010), ‘More of the same? Conflicting perspectives of obesity causation and intervention amongst overweight people, health professionals and policy makers’, Social Science and Medicine, 70: 1042–1104.Google Scholar
Grogan, S., Flett, K., Clark-Carter, D., Gough, B., Davey, R., Richardson, D. and Rajaratnam, G. (2011), ‘Women smokers’ experiences of an age-appearance anti-smoking intervention: a qualitative study’, British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(4): 675–689.Google Scholar
Health and Social Care Information Centre (2011), Health Survey for England – 2010http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/hse10report [13 August2012].Google Scholar
Health and Social Care Information Centre (2012), Health Survey for England – 2011, health, social care and lifestyleshttp://www.ic.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB09300 [13 August 2012].Google Scholar
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. and Greene, W. H. (2005), Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Obesity Task Force (2009), IOTF Prevalence Data: Global Obesity Prevalence in Adults,http://www.iotf.org/database/index.aspGoogle Scholar
Johnson, F., Cooke, L., Croker, H. and Wardle, J. (2008), ‘Changing perceptions of weight in great britain: comparison of two population surveys’, British Medical Journal, 337: 270–272.Google Scholar
Kawachi, I. and Kennedy, B. P. (2006), The Health of Nations: Why Inequality is Harmful to Your Health, New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Kuchler, F. and Variyam, J. N. (2003), ‘Mistakes were made: misperception as a barrier to reducing overweight’, International Journal of Obesity, 27: 856–861.Google Scholar
Kuhfeld, W. F., Tobias, R. D. and Garratt, M. (2009), Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications. Marketing Research Methods in SAS – Experimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques, Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc., http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2009.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lancsar, E. and Louviere, J. (2006), ‘Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?’, Health Economics, 15: 797–811.Google Scholar
Louviere, J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000), Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallen, C. D., Dunn, K. M., Thomas, E. and Peat, G. (2008), ‘Thicker paper and larger font increased response and completeness in a postal survey’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(11): 1296–1300.Google Scholar
Miller, E. C., Schulz, M. R., Bibeau, D. L., Galka, A., Spann, L. I., Martin, L. B., Aronson, R. E. and Chase, C. M. (2008), ‘Factors associated with misperception of weight in the stroke belt’, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(3): 323–328.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006), Obesity: The Prevention, Identification, Assessment and Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults and Children, London: NICE. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG43/Guidance/SectionGoogle Scholar
Owen, K., Pettman, T., Haas, M., Viney, R. and Misan, G. (2009), ‘Individual preferences for diet and exercise programmes: changes over a lifestyle intervention and their link with outcomes’, Public Health Nutrition, 13(2): 245–252.Google Scholar
Roux, L., Ubach, C., Donaldson, C. and Ryan, M. (2004), ‘Valuing the benefits of weight loss programs: participants’ views: an application of the discrete choice experiment’, Obesity Research, 12: 1342–1351.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (1998), ‘Valuing psychological factors in the provision of assisted reproductive techniques using the economic instrument of willingness to pay’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 19: 179–204.Google Scholar
Ryan, M., Gerard, K. and Amaya-Amaya, M. (2008), Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care, Vol. 11, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Ryan, M., Watson, V. and Entwistle, V. (2009), ‘Rationalising the ‘irrational’: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses’, Health Economics, 18(3): 321–336.Google Scholar
San Miguel, F., Ryan, M. and Amaya-Amaya, M. (2004), ‘Irrational stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation’, Health Economics, 14: 307–322.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1993), ‘Internal consistency of choice’, Econometrica, 61(3): 495–521.Google Scholar
Speakman, R. (2010), http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/sep/15/obesity-crisis-cannot-solved-exercise [13 August2012].Google Scholar
Spencer, E. A., Appleby, P., Davey, G. K. and Key, T. J. (2002), ‘Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC – Oxford participants’, Public Health Nutrition, 5(4): 561–565.Google Scholar
Sun, Q., Townsend, M. J., Okereke, O. I., Franco, O. H., Hu, F. B. and Grodstein, F. (2009), ‘Adiposity and weight change in mid-life in relation to healthy survival after age 70 in women: prospective cohort study’, British Medical Journal, 339: b:3796. http://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b3796.full.pdf+htmlGoogle Scholar
Swinburn, B., Sacks, G. and Ravussin, E. (2009), ‘Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity’, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 90: 1453–1456.Google Scholar
Westerterp, K. R. and Speakman, J. R. (2008), ‘Physical activity energy expenditure has not declined since the 1980s and matches energy expenditures of wild mammals’, International Journal of Obesity, 32: 1256–1263.Google Scholar
Whitehead, R., Re, D., Xiao, D.Ozakinci, G. and Perrett, D. (2012), ‘You are what you eat: within-subject increases in fruit and vegetable consumption confer beneficial skin-color changes’, PLoS One, 7(3): e32988.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2003), Obesity. Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity, Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar