Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:49:16.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphors of Temporality: Revisiting the “Timeless Hinduism” versus “Historical Christianity” Antithesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Ankur Barua
Ankur Barua*
Affiliation:
University of Delhi, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most frequently-made statements about Christianity concerns its “historical” character—its grounding in a set of episodes in the life of the Israelite people that culminated in the climactic Christ-event, an event that brought into sharper focus than before a redemptive process that has been going on since the beginning of times and will last till the end of times. The assertion of this central aspect of Christian self-understanding has often gone hand in hand with a statement of what the Hindu philosophical-religious traditions are alleged to have lacked, namely, a historical sense. It is charged that Hindu thinkers believed that individuals are chained to never-ending cycles that do not lead anywhere, with all sense of meaning or purpose thus drained from temporal existence.1 A clear statement of such a demarcation comes from Alan Richardson, who states, specifically in the European context, that “ ‘Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him’ (Rom 6:9) … is the text which changed the outlook of European man upon history…. The European mind was freed by the proclamation of God's saving act in history from the fatalistic theory of cyclical recurrence which had condemned Greek historiography to sterility.”2 The Christian faith is believed to have liberated humanity from the tortuous cosmological circles of eternal recurrence, once in the world of late antiquity when it was still a fledgling in the milieu of Hellenistic mystery cults and much later in colonial British India when it came into contact with the patterns of classical Hindu thought. It is almost as if as an appendix to Saint Augustine's famous remark, “God did not create the world in time, but with time,”3 Christian theologians in his wake had added, “Therefore, Christianity did not come into the world in history, but with history.”

Type
ARTICLES
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 147 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sabapathy Kulandran, for instance, writes: “The Hindu view of time and the world is rigorously cyclical…. There is only an eternal repetition.” Grace: A Comparative Study of the Doctrine in Christianity and Hinduism (London: Lutterworth, 1964) 247.

2 Richardson, Alan, History Sacred and Profane (London: SCM, 1964) 60Google Scholar.

3 Augustine, Civ. 11.6.

4 For example, see Fuller, Chris J., The Camphor Flame: Popular Hinduism and Society in India (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992Google Scholar); Sharma, Arvind, Hinduism and Its Sense of History (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003);CrossRefGoogle ScholarLipner, Julius, Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar; Niyogi Balslev, Anindita, A Study of Time in Indian Philosophy (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1983Google Scholar).

5 Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the Philosophy of World History (trans. H. B. Nisbet; Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1982) 136Google Scholar.

6 Mill, James, The History of British India (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975) 329Google Scholar.

7 Sharma, , Hinduism and Its Sense of History, 1Google Scholar.

8 Anderson, Bernhard W., Rediscovering the Bible (London: Lutterworth Press, 1960) 27–28Google Scholar.

9 Niebuhr, Reinhold, Faith and History: A Comparison of Christian and Modern Views of History (London: Nisbet and Co., Ltd., 1949) 17–22Google Scholar.

10 Newbigin, Lesslie, Foolishness to the Greeks (London: SPCK, 1986) 39–40Google Scholar.

11 Lannoy, Richard, The Speaking Tree: A Study of Indian Culture and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971) 293Google Scholar.

12 Joseph Needham, “Time and History in China and the West,” Leonardo 10 (1977) 233–36, at 233.

13 Arnaldo Momigliano, “Time in Ancient Historiography,” History and Theory 5 (1966) 1–23.

14 Trompf, G.W., The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought: From Antiquity to the Reformation (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1979) 120Google Scholar.

15 Barr, James, Biblical Words for Time (London: SCM, 1962) 142Google Scholar.

16 Thomas, Lynn, “The Nature of the Repetition in the Indian Idea of Cyclical Time,” in Indian Insights: Buddhism, Brahmanism and Bhakti (ed. Connolly, Peter and Hamilton, Sue; London: Luzac Oriental, 1997) 83–89Google Scholar.

17 Śaṁkara, Vedānta-Śūtra I. 2, 17.

18 Rāmānuja, Śrī-Bhāṣya IV, 4, 21–IV, 4, 22.

19 Embree, Ainslee T., Utopias in Conflict: Religion and Nationalism in Modern India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990) 27Google Scholar.

20 This text is dated between the fifth and the fourteenth centuries C.E. Quoted in Key Chapple, Christopher, “Action Oriented Morality in Hinduism” in Indian Ethics: Classical Traditions and Contemporary Challenges (ed. Bilimoria, Purushottama, Prabhu, Joseph and Sharma, Renuka; New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2007) 351–62Google Scholar, at 352.

21 Fay, Brian, Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996) 169–74Google Scholar; Burns, Robert M., “Classical Historicism,” in Philosophies of History: From Enlightenment to Postmodernity (ed. Burns, Robert M. and Rayment-Pickard, Hugh; Oxford: Blackwell, 2000) 57–97Google Scholar; Nota, John H., S.J., Phenomenology and History (Chicago: Loyola University Press, 1967) 14Google Scholar.

22 Krishna Matilal, Bimal, “KARMA – A Metaphysical Hypothesis of Moral Causation in History,” in Contemporary Indian Philosophers of History (ed. Mahadevan, T. M. P. and Cairns, Grace E.; Calcutta: The World Press Private Ltd., 1977) 235–47Google Scholar.

23 Chatterjee, Satish Chandra and Datta, Dhirendra Mohan, Introduction to Indian Philosophy (Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1939) 18Google Scholar.

24 Reichenbach, Bruce R., “Karma, Causation, and Divine Intervention,” Philosophy East and West 39 (1989) 135–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Balslev, , A Study of Time in Indian Philosophy, 147Google Scholar.

26 Raju, C. K., The Eleven Pictures of Time: The Physics, Philosophy and Politics of Time Beliefs (Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2003) 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Needham, “Time and History in China and the West,” 233–36.

28 Thapar, Romila, Time as a Metaphor of History: Early India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

29 Lipner, Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, ch. 10.

30 Prasad, Rajendra, Conceptual Essays in Ethics and Metaethics (Delhi: ICPR, Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1989) 275–305Google Scholar.

31 Basham, Arthur Llewellyn, The Wonder That Was India (New Delhi: Rupa & Co., 1999) 493–94Google Scholar.

32 Sharma, , Hinduism and Its Sense of History, 83Google Scholar.

33 Henrik Syse, “Augustinian ‘History’ and the Road to Peace,” Augustinian Studies 31 (2000) 225–39, at 225–26.

34 Markus, Robert Austin, Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1970Google Scholar).

35 Civ. 4.33.

36 Starr, Chester G., “Historical and Philosophical Time,” History and Theory 5 (1966) 24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Löwith, Karl, Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949Google Scholar).

38 Robert Milburn, Leslie Pollington, Early Christian Interpretations of History (London: A. and C. Black, 1954Google Scholar).

39 Ferrarotti, Franco, The Myth of Inevitable Progress (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985Google Scholar); Brunner, Emil, The Scandal of Christianity (London: SCM, 1951Google Scholar); Baillie, John, The Belief in Progress (London: Oxford University Press, 1951Google Scholar).

40 Copleston, Frederick Charles, Philosophies and Cultures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980) 106Google Scholar.

41 Raimundo Panikkar, “Toward a Typology of Time and Temporality in the Ancient Indian Tradition,” Philosophy East and West 24 (1974) 161–64, at 162–63.

42 Lannoy, , The Speaking Tree: A Study of Indian Culture and Society, 292Google Scholar.

43 Barr, , Biblical Words for Time, 105Google Scholar.

44 Momigliano, “Time in Ancient Historiography,” 1–23.

45 Seters, John van, In Search of History: Historiography in the Ancient World and the Origins of Biblical History (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983) 8–9Google Scholar.

46 Robinson, John A. T., Truth is Two-Eyed (London: SCM, 1979) 45Google Scholar.

47 Classical Hindu Mythology: A Reader in the Sanskrit Purāṇas (ed. and trans. Cornelia Dimmit and J. A. B. van Buitenen; Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1978) 3.

48 Koch, Klaus, The Prophets: The Assyrian Period (London: SCM, 1982) 144Google Scholar.

49 Reincourt, Amaury de, The Soul of India (New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Ltd., 1986) 15Google Scholar.

50 Krishna, Daya, Indian Philosophy: A Counter Perspective (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1991) 3–15Google Scholar. Further, challenging the time-hallowed notion that Indian philosophy has one predominant concern, namely, mokṣa, Krishna points out that schools such as the Nyāya and the Vaiśeṣika were (at best) tangentially directed towards this end (31–32).

51 Balslev, A Study of Time in Indian Philosophy.

52 Martha C. Nussbaum and Amartya Sen, “Internal Criticism and Indian Rationalist Traditions,” in Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation (ed. Michael Krausz; Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989) 299–325, at 305.

53 Sen, Amartya K., Reason before Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999) 24Google Scholar.

54 Sheldon Pollock, “Mīmāṁsā and the Problem of History in Traditional India,” JAOS 109 (1989) 603–10, at 608.

55 Starr, “Historical and Philosophical Time,” 24–35.

56 Sharma, , Hinduism and Its Sense of History, 93–95Google Scholar.

57 Pollock, “Mīmāṁsā and the Problem of History in Traditional India,” 603–10, at 609.

58 Needham, “Time and History in China and the West,” 233–36, at 234.

59 Collingwood, Robin George, The Idea of History (Oxford: Clarendon, 1946Google Scholar).

60 Cullmann, Oscar, Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History (London: SCM, 1952Google Scholar); Niebuhr, Faith and History: A Comparison of Christian and Modern Views of History.

61 Koselleck, Reinhart, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (trans. Keith Tribe; Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990Google Scholar).

62 Karl Löwith, Meaning in History.

63 Blumenberg, Hans, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age (trans. Robert M. Wallace; Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1983Google Scholar); Wallace, Robert M., “Progress, Secularization and Modernity: The Blumenberg-Lowith Debate,” New German Critique 22 (1981) 63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Rossum, Gerhard Dohrn-Van, History of the Hour: Clocks and Modern Temporal Orders (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996Google Scholar).

65 Richardson, , History Sacred and Profane, 65–66Google Scholar.

66 Charles P. Carlson Jr., “The Natural Order and Historical Explanation,” Augustiniana 21 (1971) 417–47.

67 Lewry, Osmund, The Theology of History (Notre Dame, Ind.: Fides, 1969) 13Google Scholar.

68 Carr, Edward Hallett, What is History? (New York: Vintage Books, 1961) 114Google Scholar.

69 MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984) 147Google Scholar.

70 Press, Gerald A., “History and the Development of the Idea of History in Antiquity,” History and Theory 16 (1977) 280–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Ibid., at 291–92.

72 Klostermaier, Klaus, Hinduism: A Short History (Oxford: Oneworld, 2000) 4Google Scholar.

73 Quoted in Buddha Prakash, “The Hindu Philosophy of History,” Journal of the History of Ideas 16 (1955) 494–505, at 494–95.

74 The Rajatarangini (trans. R. S. Pandit; New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 1953) 3:171.

75 Richardson, , History Sacred and Profane, 57–59Google Scholar.

76 Alan Bayly, Christopher, “Modern Indian Historiography,” in Companion to Historiography, (ed. Bentley, Michael; London: Routledge, 1997) 677–91Google Scholar, at 679. Also see Chandra Pande, Govind, “Itihāsa,” in Philosophical Concepts Relevant to Sciences in Indian Tradition (ed. Kumar Sen, Pranab; Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2008) 289–94Google Scholar, at 290.

77 Stanford, Michael, A Companion to the Study of History (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1994Google Scholar).

78 Hebblethwaite, Brian, The Problems of Theology (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1980) 102–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Young, Norman J., History and Existential Theology: The Role of History in the Thought of Rudolf Bultmann (London: Epworth Press, 1969Google Scholar); Bultmann, Rudolf, “New Testament and Mythology,” in Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate (ed. Bartsch, Hans-Werner; London: SPCK, 1972) 1–44Google Scholar. A similar point is made by Cullmann, , Christ and Time: The Primitive Christian Conception of Time and History, 137Google Scholar.

80 Osmund Lewry notes that “[the] Christian believes that it [the resurrection] really happened, and attaches to it a central position in his theology of history, but it still remains open to question whether Christian faith can make it an event within history, as history is normally understood.” The Theology of History, 22.

81 Johnson, Luke Timothy, The Real Jesus: The Misguided Quest for the Historical Jesus and the Truth of the Traditional Gospels (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1997) 136Google Scholar.

82 Because the believer turns to Christ not through a historical picture but through the witness of scripture in the light of the resurrection faith which, however, transcends the scrutiny of the historian, Emil Brunner cautions the Christian not to build her faith on something as “unsafe as historical science.” The Mediator (London: Lutterworth Press, 1934) 156.

83 Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli, The Recovery of Faith (Delhi: Hind Pocket Books, 1967) 117Google Scholar.

84 Swami Vivekananda, The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda (20 vols.; Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1966–1971) 6:128.

85 Karl Löwith, Meaning in History, 182.

86 Kevin Schilbrack, “Myth and Metaphysics,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (2000) 65–80.

87 Southgate, Beverley, History: What and Why? Ancient, Modern, and Postmodern Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2001Google Scholar).

88 Prakash, Gyan, “Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives from Indian Historiography,” in Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial (ed. Chaturvedi, V.; London: Verso, 2000) 163–90Google Scholar, at 175.

89 Fontana, Josep, The Distorted Past: A Reinterpretation of Europe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995) 168Google Scholar.

90 Rabindranath Tagore, ‘Sāhitye Aitihāsikatā,’ May 1941; translated by Ranajit Guha in History at the Limit of World-History (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002) 99.