Article contents
The Early Church and War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2011
Extract
The attitude of the early church toward the problem of participation in warfare has been not a little studied and controverted. The data with regard to participation and the attitude toward it have been assiduously compiled by a series of investigators among whom four may be mentioned for their distinctive and permanent contributions. Adolf Harnack in his Militia Christi pointed out that the early Christians rejected the militia of the world in favor of the militia of Christ. In theory the Church was pacifist until the time of Constantine though in practice some Christians were in the legions. James Moffatt in the course of a fruitful survey called attention to the shift in early Christianity from marital to martial metaphors. Whereas in the Old Testament infidelity was called adultery, in the New Testament and the early church it is described as desertion. Such militant terminology could be used by the early Christians “without the slightest risk of misconception” because their pacifist principles were so well known. C. J. Cadoux in The Early Christian Attitude to War set the entire problem in the broad context of theological and political thinking. His work remains the indispensable point of departure for all subsequent investigation. Leclercq supplied in French translation the recorded acts of the soldier martyrs and the texts of the extant inscriptions which mention Christians in the army.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1946
References
1 Tübingen, 1905. (Abbreviation: Harnack MC.)
2 Article “War” in Hasting's Dictionary of the Apostolic Church II (1918), pp. 646–73Google Scholar. (Abbreviation: DAC.)
3 London, 1919, subsequently incorporated in The Early Church and the World (Edinburgh, 1925)Google Scholar. (Abbreviation: Cadoux EC.)
4 Article “Militarisme” in Cabrol's Dictionnaire d'Archéologie Chrétienne II (1933), pp. 1107–81. Cf. I, 294–97. (Abbreviation: DACh.)
5 G. J. Heering (in Holland, 1928; New York, 1943).
6 New York, 1943.
7 Washington, D. C., 1935.
8 Cels. VIII, 68–69.
9 DAC II, 664a.
10 The Historic Church and Modern Pacifism (New York, 1943), p. 60Google Scholar.
11 Apologeticus XXXVII, cf. XLII, 5 (Abbreviation: Apol).
12 De Corona Militis XI (Abbreviation: Cor).
13 Epistolae XXXIX (XXXIII), 3.
14 Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica VIII, app. (Abbreviation: HE).
15 Ibid., VIII, 1, 8.
16 Harnack MC, pp. 117–21.
17 Cadoux EC, pp. 580.
18 Nos. 12, 21, 22, 24, 29, 47.
19 Cadoux EC, p. 421.
20 Cels. VIII, 73.
21 Ramsay, W. M., Cities and Bishoprics of Phrygia, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1895), p. 717Google Scholar, no. 651.
22 Cor. XI.
23 Ruinart, , Acta Martyrum (Ratisbon, 1859), pp. 340–42Google Scholar.
24 Eusebius HE IX, 8, 2–4.
25 Ibid. VII, 30, 8.
26 Theodoret HE II, 26.
27 Burkitt, F. C., Early Eastern Christianity (London, 1904)Google Scholar.
28 Oratio ad Graecos XI.
29 Ante-Nicene Fathers VIII, 730. (Abbreviation: ANF.)
30 Acts of Archelaus and Mani 1, ANF VI, 179.
31 Legatio pro Christianis XI.
32 Trypho CX.
33 I Apol. XXXIX.
34 Stromata IV, 8. (Abbreviation: Str.)
35 Paedagogus 1, 12. (Abbreviation: Paed.)
36 Ibid. II, 4, cf. II, 2.
37 Protrepticus XI, 116. (Abbreviation: Protr.)
38 Adversus Haereses IV, 34, 4. (Abbreviation: Haer.)
39 De Idolotria XIX. (Abbreviation: Idol.)
40 Apol. XXXVII.
41 Cor. XI.
42 Octavius XXX, 6. (Abbreviation: Oct.)
43 Ad Donatum VI, 10. (Abbreviation: Don.)
44 De Habitu Virginum XI.
45 Adversus Nationes I, 6. (Abbreviation: Nat.)
46 Divinae Institutiones VI, xx, 15–16. (Abbreviation: Inst.)
47 Naudet, , “La Police chez les Romains,” Mém. de l'Acad. des Sciences morales et pol. de l'Institut de France VI (1850), pp. 763–870Google Scholar.
48 Reynolds, P. K. Baillie, The Vigiles of Imperial Rome (Oxford, 1926)Google Scholar.
49 On their functions see Mommsen, Theodore, Ephemeris Epigraphica IV (1881), pp. 529–30Google Scholar.
50 DACh II p. 1160, no. 24.
51 De Fuga XIII.
52 DACh pp. 1172–73.
53 Babut, E.-Ch., “La guarde impériale et les officiers de l'armée romaine,” Rev. Hist. CXIV (1913), pp. 225–60Google Scholar: CXVI (1914), pp. 225–93. He holds that the domestici did not long remain merely an imperial guard. Ernst Stein dissents in his Geschichte des spätröm. Reiches (1928), p. 82.
54 Eusebius HE VIII, ix, 7.
55 Easton, Burton Scott, The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus (New York, 1934)Google Scholar, Pt. II, Canons 16, p. 42. He justifies the attribution of these canons to Hippolytus.
56 Idol. XIX.
57 Protr. X, 100. γεώργει, φαμέν, εἰ γεωργὸς εἶ, ἀλλὰ γνῶθι τὸν θεὸν γεωργῶν, χαὶ πλεῖθι ὁ τῆς ναυτιλίας ἐρῶν, ἀλλὰ τὸν ούράνιον κυβερνήτην παρακαλῶν. στρατευόμενόν σε κατείληφεν ἡ γνῶσις. τοῦ δίκαια σημαίνοντος ἄκουε στρατηγοῦ.
58 Combès, Gustave, La Doctrine Politique de Saint Augustin (Paris, 1927), p. 261Google Scholar.
59 Eppstein, John, The Catholic Tradition of the Law of Nations (Washington D. C., 1935), p, 40Google Scholar.
60 Paed. I, viii, 65, l. ὁ μέγας ἡμῶν ἐκεῖνος, στρατηγός, ὁ τῶν ὅλων ἡγεμὼν λόγος.
61 Harnack MC, p. 87f.
62 Sulpicius Severus, Vita Martini, I, 1–4.
63 Leclercq, DACh. II, pp. 1116–19.
64 Μάλιστα τὸ ἁμάρτημα [τῆς εἰδωλολατρίας] εὑρίσκεται ἐν ταῖς στρατευομένοις …. τοῦτο τὸ ἁμάρτημα τὸ τῆς κλοπῆς σχέδον πάντες οἱ στρατεύομενοι ἁμαρτάνουσιν. Harnack, Adolf, “Der kirchengeschichtliche Ertrag des exegetischen Arbeiten des Origenes,” Texte und Untersuchungen XLII, 3 (1918), p. 117Google Scholar2 from Cramer, Catena in I Cor. V, p. 98 to which I have not had access.
65 Idol. XIX.
66 Windisch, Hans, Der messianische Krieg und das Urchristentum (Tübingen, 1909)Google Scholar.
67 DAC II, p. 651a.
68 Monceaux, Paul, “Chronologie des Oeuvres de Tertullien,” Revue de Philologie N. S. XXII (1898), pp. 77–92Google Scholar.
69 Harnack, Adolf, Die Chronologie der altchristlichen Literatur bis Eusebius II (Leipzig, 1904), p. 273Google Scholar.
70 Cadoux EC, pp. 347, 479. Cf. Frick, Robert, “Die Geschichte des Reich-Gottes-Gedankens in der alten Kirche bis zu Origenes und Augustin,” Beihefte z. Zt. f. d. neutestamentliche Wissenschaft VI (1928)Google Scholar.
71 Cadoux, EC 305 f.
72 Apol. XXXII, XXXIX, Ad Scapulum III. But immo quam celeriter veniat in De Oratione V. On the mora finis compare Cyprian Don. XX. For the idea in Hippolytus see Neumann, Karl J., Hippolytus von Rom in seiner Stellung zu Staat und Welt (Leipzig, 1902), pp. 56–57Google Scholar.
73 The Epistle of Diognetus affords a classic statement. For many similar passages consult Luigi Salvatorelli, “Il pensiero del Cristianismo antico intorno allo stato, dagli Apologeti ad Origene,” Bilychnis XVI (1920), pp. 264–79, 333–52 ; also Wagner, Wilhelm, Der Christ und die Welt nach Clemens von Alexandrien (Göttingen, 1903)Google Scholar.
74 Cyprian Ad Demetrianum XVII and Tertullian, De Spectaculis.
75 Goguel, Maurice, Les chrétiens et l'Empire Romain à l'époque du Nouveau Testament (Paris, 1908)Google Scholar.
76 Eusebius, HE IV, xxvi, 7.
77 “Carmina,” Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum XV. The date has been greatly controverted. The whole discussion was reviewed and reëxamined by Martin, Josef, “Studien und Beiträge zur Erklärung und Zeitbestimmung Commodians,” Texte und Untersuchungen XXXIX (1913)Google Scholar. Against the view of H. Brewer, who placed the work in the latter part of the fifth century, Martin reverts to the view of the editor of the CSEL that the Carmina were written during the time of the last persecution toward the end of the third or the beginning of the fourth century.
78 On Rome as τὸ κατέχον. Tertullian, Res. XXIV; Origen, Com. in Joh. 6, 3; Lactantius, Inst. VII, 25, Hippolytus, In Danielem IV, 21, 3.
79 Fuchs, Harald, Der geistige Widerstand gegen Rom in der antiken Welt (Berlin, 1938)Google Scholar.
80 Ep. VII.
81 Nat. IX.
82 Oct. XXV.
83 Cat. 1–X and Fragmenta 11 and 12. This theme of the “fall” of Rome goes back to the speech of Scipio Nasica who advised against the demolition of Carthage on the ground that if Rome were deprived of an external foe she would succumb to internal strife. Consult Gelzer, Matthias, “Nasicas Widerspruch gegen die Zerstörung Karthagos,” Philologus LXXXVI (1930–31), pp. 261–99Google Scholar.
84 Inst. VII, 15.
85 De Civitate Dei II, 18 and III, 6 and 21.
86 Apol. XXV.
87 Inst. VI, 9.
88 Bousset, Wilhelm, The Antichrist Legend (London, 1896), p. 126Google Scholar.
89 Haer, IV, 30, 3.
90 De Pallio I.
91 Cels. II, 30. Cf. Cadoux, EC pp. 378 and 386.
92 Cels. VIII, 55.
93 Cels. IV, 70. Compare Massart, Guglielmo, Società e stato nel cristianesimo primitivo: la concezione di Origene (Padua, 1932)Google Scholar.
94 Apol. XXXVIII.
95 Cels. VIII, 73.
96 “Comm. Ser. 37 in Mt.” 24, 7–8. Die griechischen christlichen Schriftstellern XXXVIII, p. 69.
97 Cels. VIII, 72.
98 II Apol. VII.
99 Haer. V, 20. Compare Schmidt, Wolfgang, Die Kirche bei Irenaeus (Helsingfors, 1934)Google Scholar.
100 Cels. VIII, 75. Compare Weinel, Heinrich, Die Stellung des Urchristentums zum Staat (Tübingen, 1908)Google Scholar.
101 Ps. 122, 7. On the meaning of shalom consult Kittel, Gerhard, Theologisches Wörterbuch z. Neuen Testament (Stuttgart, 1935)Google Scholar under εἰρήνη and Hempel, Johann, “Die israelitische Anschauungen von Segen unf Fluch im Lichte altorientalische Parallelen,” Zt. d. deutschen morganländischen Gesell. LXXIX (1925), pp. 20–110Google Scholar. Since shalom appears in personal names there is a good discussion in Noth, Martin, “Die israelitischen Personnennamen in Rahmen der gemeinsemitischen Namengebung,” Beiträge zur Wiss. v. Alten v. Neuen Test. III, 10 (1928)Google Scholar.
102 Nestle, W., “Der Friedensgedanke in der antiken Welt,” Philologus Suppl. XXXI, 1 (1938)Google Scholar and the bibliography listed in Rostovtzeff, Michael, Social and Economic History of the Hellenistic World III (Oxford, 1941), p. 1358Google Scholar.
103 Article “Pax” in Roscher's Lexikon.
104 Rom. 8, 6.
105 Mt. 10, 13.
106 Phil. 4, 7. Compare Fuchs, Harald, “Augustin und der antike Friedensgedanke,” Neue philol. Untersuchungen III (Berlin, 1926)Google Scholar.
107 Origen, “Comm. Ser. 102 in Matth.” GCS XXXVIII, p. 221–22.
108 Apol. XXXVII. Cf; Justin 1 Apol. XIV.
109 Protr. X.
110 De Patientia XV–XVI.
111 Ep. XIV.
112 De Patientia VI.
113 I Apol. XV.
114 Acts 15, 29.
115 De Pudicitia XII.
116 This and many other citations in Resch, Gotthold, “Das Aposteldekret nach ausserkanonischen Textgestalt,” Texte und Untersuchungen XXVIII, N. F. XIII, 3 (1905), p. 12Google Scholar, no. 21, cf. p. 43.
117 Apol. XXXVII.
118 Oct. XXX, 6.
119 Don. VI, 10.
120 Nat. I, 6.
121 Instit. VI, 20.
122 Paulini Nol. Ep. XVIII, 7, Migne PL LXI, 240C.
123 Legatio XXXV.
124 Cels. III, 7.
125 Canon XVI.
126 Ep. Cl. II, 188, 13. Migne PG XXXII, 682.
127 ANF VIII, 728.
128 Passages collected in Harnack, Adolf, “Marcion,” Texte und Untersuchungen XLV (1921), p. 104Google Scholar.
129 Or. XL, 35, H. F. Arnim, Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta II, 55, 20ff. Cf. Fuchs, Augustin, pp. 101–103.
130 Ep. ad Cor. XX.
131 Fuchs, Augustin, pp. 21 and 103–109.
132 Inst. VII, 24.
133 Ibid. VI, 20.
134 Ep. XCIX.
135 Lietzmann, article “Lactantius” in Pauly-Wissowa.
136 Tacitus, Hist. III, 81.
137 Mangold, William, De Ecclesia primitiva pro Caesaribus ac magistratibus Romanis preces fundente dissertatio (Bonn, 1881)Google Scholar.
138 Apol. XXX.
139 Str. II, 18.
140 Cels. IV, 82.
141 Ibid. VIII, 73.
142 Demonstratio Evangelica 1, viii, 29b–30b, Cf. Cadoux, EC 4691 and 578.
143 Idol. XIX.
144 Hom, in Jesu Nave XV, 1.
145 Adversus Marcionem IV, 16.
146 Cels. VII, 26.
- 6
- Cited by