Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:16:42.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theology of Second Clement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Karl Paul Donfried
Karl Paul Donfried
Affiliation:
Smith College, Northampton, Mass. 01060
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has never been a form-critical study of 2 Clement. Because of this, conclusions concerning its Gattung have varied considerably. Harnack and Goodspeed, for example, have argued that 2 Clement is in the form of a letter, and beyond that, that it was sent by Bishop Soter of Rome (c. 166–74) to Corinth. Contrary to this position, Lightfoot, Knopf, and Windisch, among others, have argued that it is either a sermon or a homily. Although in recent years this latter position has been readily accepted, it always appears as an assertion without support, form-critical or otherwise.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , October 1973 , pp. 487 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harnack, Adolf von, Die Chronologie der altchristlichen Literatur bis Ensebius, II, 1 (Leipzig, 1897), 438–50Google Scholar; idem, Zum Ursprung des sogenannten zweiten Klemensbriefes, ZNW 6 (1905), 67–71Google Scholar; Goodspeed, Edgar J., The Apostolic Fathers (New York, 1950), 83.Google Scholar

2 Lightfoot, J. B., The Apostolic Fathers (London, 1890), Part I, vol. II, 194ff.Google Scholar; Knopf, R., Die zwei Clemensbriefe (Tübingen, 1920), 151Google Scholar; Windisch, H., Das Christentum des zweiten Klemensbriefes, in Harnack-Ehrung (Leipzig, 1921), 119–34.Google Scholar

3 Grant, Robert M., The Apostolic Fathers, I (New York, 1964), 44Google Scholar; Koester, Helmut, Synoptische Überlieferung bei den apostolischen Vätern (Berlin, 1957), 62.Google Scholar

4 For further amplification and documentation of suggestions made in this paper (delivered in its present form at the 1971 Oxford Patristic Conference), see Donfried, K. P., The Setting of 2 Clement in Early Christianity (Leiden, 1974).Google Scholar

5 This and all other English translations of 2 Clement are from Richardson, Cyil C., Early Christian Fathers (Philadelphia, 1953).Google Scholar

6 English translation by Schoedel, William R. in Grant, Robert M. and Freedman, David Noel, The Secret Sayings of Jesus (London, 1963), 136.Google Scholar

7 Aufsätze zur Gnosis, Dörries, Hermann, editor (Göttingen, 1967), 25ft.Google Scholar

8 Les livres secrets des Gnostiques d'Égypte (Paris, 1958), 155–56.Google Scholar

9 Grant, op. cit., 140–41.

10 The Theology of the Gospel of Thomas (London, 1961), 256.Google Scholar

11 Richardson, op. cit., 198.

12 The older designation of this document was the Treatise of Three Natures. Puech, H. C. and Quispel, G., Le quatrième écrit gnostique du Codex Jung, VC 9 (1955) 94–102.Google Scholar attributed it to Heracleon; however, this suggestion should be regarded with extreme caution.

13 This English translation is taken from Daniélou, Jean, The Theology of Jewish Christianity (London, 1964), 304Google Scholar, who is himself dependent upon the information supplied by Puech and Quispel in the article just cited. It was impossible to doublecheck the accuracy of the translation, since the Coptic text is at present still unavailable.

14 Puech and Quispel, op. cit., 97, as translated in Daniélou (note 13).

15 Eusebius, H. E. 4.23.9–11.

16 J. B. Lightfoot, op. cit., 197.

17 Against Koester, op. cit., 62ff.

18 Bornkamm, G., The History of the Origin of the So-Called Second Letter to the Corinthians, The Authorship and Integrity of the New Testament (SPCK Theological Collections 4: London, 1965), 73–81.Google Scholar

19 Deissmann, G. Adolph, Bible Studies (Edinburgh, 1923), 10Google Scholar; Light from the Ancient East (Grand Rapids, 1965), 229fGoogle Scholar

20 Grässer, Erich, Der Hebräerbrief, ThR 30 (1964), 160.Google Scholar

21 Bultmann, Rudolf, Die drei Johannesbriefe (Göttingen, 1967), 47.Google Scholar

22 Dibelius, M., Geschichte der urchristlichen Literatur, II (Berlin, 1926), 60.Google Scholar

23 Marxsen, W., Einleitung in das Neue Testament (Gütersloh, 1963), 205.Google Scholar