Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:37:54.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leontius of Byzantium and his Defence of the Council of Chalcedon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2011

Silas Rees
Affiliation:
Grantwood, New Jersey

Extract

The contribution to christology made by Leontius of Byzantium (fl. 520–543 A.D.) lies in his doctrine that the manhood of Christ is ‘enhypostatic’ (ἐνυπόστατος)—the doctrine of Enhypostasia or Inexistence. The Council of Chalcedon (451) defined the person or hypostasis of Christ as consisting in the union of two perfect natures, the nature of God and the nature of man, without division or confusion. On the principle laid down by Aristotle and accepted by all disputants, that there can be no such thing as a nature or substance without hypostasis (ϕύσις, οὐσία ἀνυπόστατος), the question arises of how it possible to avoid the conclusion of two hypostases, corresponding to the two perfect natures, in Christ. Such was the problem set by the definition of Chalcedon and the logic of Aristotle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 111 note 1 The name of Leontius of Byzantium was brought to the serious consideration of English readers by H. M. Relton, A Study in Christology (1917). The works attributed to Leontius are found in Migne, Patrologia Graeca, volume 86.

page 118 note 1 J. B. Cotelerius, Ecclesiae Graecae Monumenta, III, 880–376.