Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:18:02.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What was the ‘Imperium Romanum’?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Andrew Lintott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The imperium populi Romani was the power Romans exercised over other peoples, viewed in its widest sense. What we call the Roman empire, that is the empire viewed as a political entity, was usually conceived by the Romans in terms of people, the populus Romanus and its sodi et amid. The latter were differentiated into various categories according to their form of government and the terms of their association with Rome, but they were united in being regarded as contributors to Roman power and proper subjects for Roman concern.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , April 1981 , pp. 53 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crawford, M. H., Roman Republican Coinage, nos. 393, 397, 403Google Scholar.

2. In Imperialism in the Ancient World, ed. Garnsey, P. D. A. and Whittaker, C. R. (Cambridge, 1978), pp. 159 ff.Google Scholar

3. JRS 69 (1979), 1 ff.Google Scholar

4. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar.

5. JRS 69 (1979), 175 ff.Google Scholar, reviewing Luttwak, E. N.. The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire (Baltimore/London, 1976)Google Scholar.

6. Hassall, M., Crawford, M., and Reynolds, J., JRS 64 (1974), 195 ff.Google Scholar, and see my comments in ZPE 20 (1976), 65 ff.Google Scholar

7. A slightly earlier example of this usage in Sherk, , Roman Documents from the Greek East, no. 44Google Scholar, lines 2–3, another perhaps in Dittenberger, Sylloge3, no. 683, 42 ff.

8. Arethusa 3 (1970), 92ff.Google Scholar; CPh 72 (1977), 126 ff.Google Scholar

9. Accame, S., ll dominio romano in Grecia (Rome, 1946), pp. 16 ff.Google Scholar; Bruns, , Fontes no. 11, lines 96 ff.Google Scholar

10. See e.g. Sail, . Hist. 1.133–4Google Scholar; 2.36–7, 80; 4.18–19 Maurenbrecher; Mihailov, G., Inscriptiones Graecae Bulgariae 1.314Google Scholar; 392.

11. Derbe was later part of Cappadocia. The flexibility of Cicero's provincia was noted by Ramsay, W. M., Historical Commentary – Galatians (London, 1899), pp. 103–7Google Scholar; Levick, B. M., Roman Colonies in Southern Asia Minor (Oxford, 1967), p. 21Google Scholar.

12. Rey-Cocquais, J.-P., JRS 68 (1978), 44 ff.Google Scholar.

13. Chevallier, R., MEFR 70 (1958), 80 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Livy 37.54.17; Cic. Off. 2.27; Digest, 49.15.7.1.

15. Quoniam, P., CRAI 1950, 332 ff.Google Scholar; Gascou, J., MEFR 81 (1969), 537 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. page 555.

16. Verr. 2.32–3; 3.12 ff.; 5.49–50. Cf. Scibona, G., Kokalos 17 (1971), 3 ff.Google Scholar for a dedication showing that Halaesa supplied naval contingents, though free.

17. Marshall, A. J., GRBS 10 (1969), 253 ff.Google Scholar

18. E.g. Flacc. 70–83; Q.F. 1.2.3.10; Fam. 13.53, 55, 56.