Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2009
All works of art reflect the time in which they are created, but the mark of a good artist is that his work will transcend the limitations of his own era and thus construct a series of bridges over the gap of centuries.
1. Brilliant, , op. cit., p. 164Google Scholar.
2. Henig, M. (ed.), A Handbook of Roman Art (Oxford, 1983), p. 236Google Scholar.
3. Cameron, A., Corippus: In Laudem Iustini Augusti Minoris (London, 1976), 1.272f. nGoogle Scholar.
4. Cameron, , op. cit., 3.204f. nGoogle Scholar.
5. On the subject of divine councils, see further Hammond, M., ‘Concilia Deorum from Homer through Milton’, Studies in Philology 30 (1933), 11–16Google Scholar.
6. See Crook, J., Consilium Principis (New York, 1975), p. 102Google Scholar. Also Brilliant, , op. cit., p. 163Google Scholar: ‘In the third and fourth centuries the implications of majesty became paramount for a society whose ancient traditions of social mobility were being replaced by a rigid class structure.’
7. Henig, , op. cit., pp. 235Google Scholar and 241.
8. See Crook, , op. cit., pp. 101ff.Google Scholar; Jones, A. H. M., The Later Roman Empire (Oxford, 1973), pp. 333ff.Google Scholar; and Bury, J. B., History of the Later Roman Empire Vol. 1 (London, 1923), pp. 23–24Google Scholar.
9. Crook, , op. cit., p. 103Google Scholar.
10. Hammond, , op. cit., 11Google Scholar.
11. MacCormack, S., Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity (California, 1981), pp. 203Google Scholar, 228, 257, 355.
12. Brilliant, , op. cit., p. 164Google Scholar.
13. Cameron, op. cit., notes on pr. 2 and also 1.157–8 n. on proskynesis, adoratio, and the importance of the imperial purple.
14. On this theme, see Braden, G., ‘Claudian and his Influence: the Realm of Venus’, Arethusa 12 (1979), 219ff.Google Scholar; and Newbold, R. F., ‘Bodies and Boundaries in Late Antiquity’, Arethusa 12 (1979), 93–114Google Scholar.