Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:40:19.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Strategy of the Second Punic War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

E. T. Salmon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The strategy of the Carthaginians, in the writer's opinion, must be regarded as an aggressive one that had been devised long before the outbreak of the war in 218 B.c. The view that their operations in Spain did not have an attack on Italy as their ultimate object is naïve. The truth is that they went to Spain after their defeat in the First Punic War precisely in order to build up a base. They hoped to make it the point d'appui for their planned war of revenge against Rome: the Iberian peninsula was to be for them a springboard for attack.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , October 1960 , pp. 131 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 131 note 1 iii. 10. 4.

page 131 note 2 Id. 11. 4–7.

page 132 note 1 Thiel, J. H., Studies on the History of Roman Sea-Power in Republican Times (Amsterdam, 1946), 1–37.Google Scholar

page 132 note 2 See, for example, Hallward, B. L. in Cambridge Ancient History, viii (1930), 25–33.Google Scholar

page 132 note 3 Kramer, F. B., ‘Massilian Diplomacy before the Second Punic War’, Amer. Journ. of Philology, Ixix (1948), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 133 note 1 Münzer, F., Römische Adelsparteien und Adelsfamilien (Stuttgart, 1920)Google Scholar; Scullard, H. H., Roman Politics, 220–150 B.c. (Oxford, 1951), 35–36.Google Scholar

page 133 note 2 xii. 48.

page 133 note 3 Zon. viii. 18.

page 133 note 4 ii. 21. 9.

page 134 note 1 Hist. iii. 34.Google Scholar

page 134 note 2 iv. 1. 5.

page 134 note 3 Dio Cassius xii. 48.

page 135 note 1 Täubler, E., Die Vorgeschichte des zweiten punischen Krieges (Berlin, 1921).Google Scholar

page 135 note 2 iii. 15. 8, 30. i.

page 135 note 3 Cf. the remarks of B. L. Hallward, op. cit. 29.

page 137 note 1 Juv. Sat. x. 157–8.Google Scholar

page 137 note 2 Commentaries (Paris, 1867), vi. 163.Google Scholar

page 137 note 3 xxii. 2–3.

page 139 note 1 ‘Some Problems of the Second Punic War’, Journ. of Roman Studies, iii (1913), 175–96; v (1915), 87–124.Google Scholar

page 140 note 1 On this point see the very pertinent remarks of Walbank, F. W., ‘Some Reflections on Hannibal's Pass’, in Journ. of Roman Studies, xlvi (1956), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar