Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:20:23.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PUBLIC FINANCE AND WAR IN ANCIENT GREECE*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2015

David M. Pritchard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Before the Persian Wars the Greeks did not rely on public finance to fight each other. Their hoplites armed and fed themselves. But in the confrontation with Persia this private funding of war proved to be inadequate. The liberation of the Greek states beyond the Balkans required the destruction of Persia's sea power. In 478 bc Athens agreed to lead an alliance to do just this. It already had Greece's largest fleet. But each campaign of this ongoing war would need tens of thousands of sailors and would go on for months. No single Greek city-state could pay for such campaigns. The alliance thus agreed to adopt the Persian method for funding war: its members would pay a fixed amount of tribute annually. This enabled Athens to force Persia out of the Dardanelles and Ionia. But the Athenians also realized that their military power depended on tribute, and so they tightened their control of its payers. In so doing they turned the alliance into an empire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 48 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article was delivered as a paper at Macquarie University's Australian Centre for Ancient Numismatic Studies. I thank the Centre's Director, Prof. K. Sheedy, for his invitation to be its Senior Research Fellow for 2014. The article draws heavily on D. M. Pritchard, Public Spending and Democracy in Classical Athens (Austin, TX, 2015). For their helpful comments on the article I am most grateful to A. Florence, D. J. Phillips, C. Pry, P. J. Rhodes and K. A. Raaflaub. All translations of Greek are my own.

References

1 Pritchard, D. M., ‘The Symbiosis between Democracy and War: The Case of Ancient of Ancient Athens’, in Pritchard, D. M. (ed.), War, Democracy and Culture in Classical Athens (Cambridge, 2010), 7–15Google Scholar.

2 E.g. Hdt. 6.34–7; see also Frost, F. J., ‘The Athenian Military before Cleisthenes’, Historia 33 (1984), 283–94Google Scholar.

3 E.g. Plut. Vit. Sol. 9.

4 E.g. Thuc. 6.56–8.

5 Singor, H. W., ‘The Military Side of the Peisistratean Tyranny’, in Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. (ed.), Peisistratos and the Tyranny. A Reappraisal of the Evidence (Amsterdam, 2000), 107, 110Google Scholar.

6 The exception is the archaic Spartans, who enslaved the Messenians and turned themselves into full-time hoplites in order to maintain their enslavement; see e.g. Cartledge, P., Spartan Reflections (Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, and London, 2001), 299–307Google Scholar.

7 Connor, W. R., ‘Early Greek Land Warfare as Symbolic Expression’, Past & Present 119 (1988), 6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 20–1; Hdt. 5.66–73.

9 Hdt. 5.96–7; see also Pritchard (n. 1), 15–16.

10 Raaflaub, K. A., ‘Learning from the Enemy: Athenian and Persian “Instruments of Empire”’, in Ma, J., Papazarakadas, N., and Parker, R. (eds.), Interpreting the Athenian Empire (London, 2009), 98–9Google Scholar.

11 Hdt. 3.89–97.

12 [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 22.7; Hdt. 6.87–93, 7.144; Thuc. 1.14.

13 E.g. [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 22.7; IG ii2 1628.339–68; see also Pritchard, D. M., ‘Costing Festivals and War: The Spending Priorities of the Athenian Democracy’, Historia 61 (2012), 51Google Scholar.

14 [Arist.] Ath. Pol. 22.7; Hdt. 7.144; see also Davis, G., ‘Mining Money in Late Archaic Athens’, Historia 63 (2014), 257–77Google Scholar.

15 Gabrielsen, V., Financing the Athenian Fleet. Public Taxation and Social Relations (Baltimore, MD, and London, 1994), 19–104Google Scholar.

16 E.g. Dem. 21.155; 21.80; Lys. 19.29, 42; 21.2; see also Pritchard (n. 13), 28.

17 E.g. [Dem.] 50.22, 53–5; see Pritchard (n. 13), 47–8.

18 E.g. [Dem.] 50.7–8, 12–13, 18–19; see also Burckhardt, L. A., ‘Söldner und Bürger als Soldaten für Athen’, in Eder, W. (ed.), Die athenische Demokratie im. 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Vollendung oder Verfall einer Verfassungsform? Akten eines Symposiums 3.–7. August 1992, Bellagio (Stuttgart, 1995), 125Google Scholar.

19 E.g. [Dem.] 50.11–12, 14–16, 25, 36.

20 Gabrielsen, V., ‘Die Kosten der athenischen Flotte in klassischer Zeit’, in Burrer, F. and Müller, H. (eds.), Kriegskosten und Kriegsfinanzierung in der Antike (Darmstadt, 2008), 46–73Google Scholar.

21 E.g. Thuc. 3.14; 6.8, 31; 7.27.

22 Loomis, W. T., Wages, Welfare Costs, and Inflation in Classical Athens (Ann Arbor, MI, 1998), 32–61, 97–120Google Scholar.

23 E.g. Thuc. 6.8.

24 E.g. Plut. Vit. Them. 10.

25 Thuc. 1.94–7.

26 Rhodes, P. J., A History of the Classical Greek World (Malden, MA, Melbourne, and Oxford, 2006), 14–21Google Scholar.

27 Kallet, L., ‘The Origins of the Athenian Economic Arche’, JHS 133 (2013), 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Raaflaub (n. 10), 100–1.

28 Thuc. 1.96, 99; see also D. J. Phillips, ‘Thucydides 1.99: Tribute and Revolts in the Athenian Empire’, ASCS 31 [2010] Proceedings, available at http://msc.uwa.edu.au/classics/ascs31.

29 Thuc. 1.97–8.

30 Meiggs, R., The Athenian Empire (Oxford, 1972), 152–74Google Scholar; Rhodes (n. 26), 20–1, 41–51.

31 Pritchard (n. 1), 17–21.

32 For its unsurpassed skill as a besieger, see e.g. Thuc. 1.102.

33 Pritchard, D. M., ‘“The Fractured Imaginary”: Popular Thinking on Military Matters in Fifth-century Athens’, AH 28 (1998), 55Google Scholar.

34 See e.g. Andoc. 3; Ar. Ach. 162–3; Ar. Av. 378–80; Ar. Lys. 170–6, 421–3, 488, 496; Ar. Plut. 112; Ar. Ran. 365; Dem. 4.40; 8.48; 9.40, 70–2; 13.10; 22.12–17; Lys. 13.46–8; 28.15.

35 E.g. Thuc. 1.142–3; 2.13, 65.

36 Pritchard (n. 13), 39–44.

37 For the cost of state religion, see Pritchard (n. 13), 23–39. For the cost of democracy, see Pritchard, D. M., Public Spending and Democracy in Classical Athens (Austin, TX, 2015), 52–90Google Scholar.

38 Xen. An. 7.1.27.

39 Thuc. 3.19; see also Samons, L. J., Empire of the Owl. Athenian Imperial Finance (Stuttgart, 2000), 205Google Scholar.

40 Gabrielsen, V., ‘Finance and Taxes’, in Beck, H. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Greek Government (Chichester, 2013), 342Google Scholar.

41 Andoc. 3.8–9; Ar. Vesp. 656–60; Plut. Vit. Arist. 24; IG i3 71.61–181; see also Pritchard (n. 13), 41–2.

42 Thuc. 2.13; IG i3 369.

43 Aeschin. 2.175; Andoc. 3.8–9; Thuc. 6.26; see also Pritchard (n. 13), 44–5; Samons (n. 40), 166–7.

44 E.g. [Xen.] Ath. Pol. 2.16; see also Pritchard (n. 1), 20–1.

45 Thuc. 8.2–5.

46 Thuc. 8.18, 37, 58.

47 Rhodes (n. 26), 142–54.

48 Xen. Hell. 2.1.27–2.9.

49 E.g. Xen. Hell. 3.5.1–2; 4.8.9–11.

50 Seager, R., ‘The Corinthian War’, in Lewis, D. M., Boardman, J., Hornblower, S., and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume VI. The Fourth Century bc (Cambridge, 1994), 100–6Google Scholar.

51 Xen. Hell. 4.8.9–10.

52 Seager (n. 50), 113–17.

53 E.g. Xen. Hell. 4.8.27–30.

54 E.g. IG ii2 24.

55 Thuc. 7.28.

56 Dem. 20.60.

57 Ar. Plut. 178; Xen. Hell. 4.8.24, 5.1.10.

58 Xen. Hell. 5.1.25.

59 Ibid. 5.1.28.

60 Ibid. 5.1.30.

61 Ibid. 5.1.31.

62 E.g. Diod. Sic. 15.5.3–5; Xen. Hell. 5.2–3; see also Rhodes (n. 26), 212–13.

63 Diod. Sic. 15.28–9; see also Cargill, J., The Second Athenian League. Empire or Free Alliance? (Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles, CA, 1981)Google Scholar.

64 IG ii2 43.15–45; see also Rhodes, P. J. and Osborne, R., Greek Historical Inscriptions 404–323 bc (Oxford, 2003), 92–113Google Scholar.

65 Christ, M. R., ‘The Evolution of the Eisphora in Classical Athens’, CQ 57 (2007), 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 E.g. Dem. 2.24, 30; 22.44; [Dem.] 50.8; Isae. 6.60.

67 RO 26.53–5; see also Rhodes, P. J., ‘The Organization of Athenian Public Finance’, G&R 60 (2013), 219Google Scholar.

68 Dem. 1.19–20; 3.11–13.

69 E.g. Dem. 18.234; [Dem.] 49.49; IG ii2 43.23; see also Brun, P., Eisphora – syntaxis – stratiotika. Recherches sur les finances militaires d'Athènes au IVe siècle av. J.-C. (Besançon and Paris, 1983), 91–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 E.g. IG i3 71.

71 Rhodes (n. 26), 232–3.

72 E.g. IG ii2 233; see also Rhodes and Osborne (n. 64), 358–61.

73 E.g. Aeschin. 2.71; Dem. 18.234.

74 Pritchard (n. 13), 45–57.

75 Gabrielsen, V., ‘Warfare and the State’, in Sabin, P., Wees, H. van, and Whitby, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare, Volume I. Greece, the Hellenistic World and the Rise of Rome (Cambridge, 2007), 264–72Google Scholar.

76 For this use of booty, see e.g. Diod. Sic. 15.47.7; Nep. Timoth. 1; Xen. Hell. 6.2.36. For plunder, see e.g. Isoc. 15.111–12; Polyaenus, Strat. 3.10.0. For protection money, see e.g. Aeschin. 2.71–2; Dem. 8.24–6.

77 Hamel, D., Athenian Generals. Military Authority in the Classical Period (Boston, MA, Cologne, and Leiden, 1998), 158Google Scholar, pace Taylor, C., ‘Bribery in Athenian Politics Part I: Accusations, Allegations, and Slander’, G&R 48 (2001), 61Google Scholar.

78 E.g. Dem. 24.11–14; Lys. 28.1–4, 6, 10; 29.2, 5, 8–11, 14; Xen. Hell. 1.2.4–5.

79 Dem. 8.9; 21.3; Diod. Sic. 16.57.2–3; Lys. 28.5–6; see also Burckhardt (n. 18), 115, 130; Millett, P., ‘Finance and Resources: Public, Private, and Personal’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient History (Chichester, 2009), 475Google Scholar.

80 Dem. 20.17–80; Lys. 28.6; see also Fröhlich, P., ‘Remarques sur la reddition des comptes des stratèges athéniens’, Dike 3 (2000), 81–111Google Scholar.

81 E.g. [Arist.] Oec. 1350b–1a, 1353a; Polyaenus, Strat. 3.11.5; see also Davies, J. K., ‘Athenian Fiscal Expertise and Its Influence’, MediterrAnt 7 (2004), 491–512Google Scholar.

82 Pritchard (n. 1), 51–5.

83 For this protection of Attica, see e.g. Harding, P., ‘Athenian Defensive Strategy in the Fourth Century’, Phoenix 42 (1988), 68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the shipping lines, see e.g. Dem. 18.301–2; [Dem.] 50; Xen. Hell. 5.4.61.

84 E.g. Dem. 6.12; 8.45; Diod. Sic. 15.78.4; Xen. Hell. 7.1.1.

85 Rhodes (n. 26), 296–322.

86 E.g. Dem. 9.47–52; Diod. Sic. 16.3.1; Frontin. Str. 4.1.6; Polyaenus, Strat. 4.2.10.

87 E.g. Dem. 9.58.

88 E.g. Dem. 9.48–50; Diod. Sic. 16.8.2.

89 J. Serrati, ‘Warfare and the State’, in Sabin, van Wees, and Whitby (n. 75), 462–4.

90 Bosworth, A. B., Conquest and Empire. The Reign of Alexander the Great (Cambridge 1988), 8–9Google Scholar.

91 Diod. Sic. 16.8.6.

92 Bosworth (n. 90), 8.

93 E.g. Diod. Sic. 7.80.13; see also Bosworth (n. 90), 241–5.

94 Serrati (n. 89), 470–9.

95 Chaniotis, A., War in the Hellenistic World. A Social and Cultural History (Oxford, 2005), 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 Polyb. 5.65, 79–87.