Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:35:46.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ides of March: Some New Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Nicholas Horsfall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The question of what actually happened on the Ides of March, 44 B.c. is merely incidental to most ancient historians, concerned as they are with Caesar's intentions and the assassins' motives. On the Ides more varied and abundant information survives, I believe, than on any other day in Roman or Greek history. But this evidence is full of obscurities and inconsistencies, largely unexplored; nor has it been examined specifically for the light it sheds on the public life of the late Republic. The outline of the day's events is easily discovered; in this paper I shall examine some of the details, with the aim of showing, above all, why the conspirators settled on the Ides of March and the Curia Pompei as the time and place for their deed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 191 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 191 note 1 Cf. G & R iv (1957), passim.Google Scholar

page 191 note 2 Some discussion in Levi, M. A., Ottaviano Capoparte, i (Firenze, 1933), 3Google Scholar; Drumann, M., Geschichte Roms2 (rev. P. Groebe, Leipzig, 1906), 648 f.Google Scholar

page 191 note 3 Dio, xliv. 15. 1 f.Google Scholar; Plut, . Caes. 64. 1.Google Scholar

page 191 note 4 Plans: App. Civ. iii. 312, iv. 250Google Scholar; departure attested only by App. Civ. ii. 472, 476Google Scholar; cf. Gelzer, M., Caesar, Politician and Statesman (tr. Needham, , Oxford, 1968), 305, 322.Google Scholar

page 191 note 5 Caes. 79. 3Google Scholar; the story is reported as ‘falsa quaedam hominum fama’ by Cic. Div. ii. 110Google Scholar; cf. Dio, xliv. 15. 3Google Scholar, App. Civ. ii. 460Google Scholar. But Suet, may have reported Cotta's intentions as they actually were: Weinstock, S., Divus lulius (Oxford, 1971), 340 f.Google Scholar; contra. Balsdon, P. V. D., Hist. vii. (1958), 85.Google Scholar

page 192 note 1 Dio, xliv. 15. 4Google Scholar; Weinstock, , 318 f.Google Scholar

page 192 note 2 Cic. Phil. ii. 79 ffGoogle Scholar. (particularly 88), with Denniston's notes; Holmes, T. Rice, The Roman Republic, iii (Oxford, 1923), 330 f.Google Scholar; Gugel, H., Gymn. lxxvii (1970), 9.Google Scholar

page 192 note 3 Cic. Phil. ii. 88Google Scholar; cf. Suet. Caes. 81. 4Google Scholar, Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes., FGH 90 F130. 23.82Google Scholar, Plut. Brut. 14. 1.Google Scholar

page 192 note 4 Suet. Caes. 80. 4Google Scholar (cf. Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 81)Google Scholar. I follow the translation by Deutsch, M. E., UCPCP ii, xiv (1916), 276Google Scholar. Suet.'s words (‘in Campo per comitiatribus ad suffragia vocantem partibus divisis e ponte deicerent atque exceptum trucidarent’) are obscure, but Deutsch's explanation is accepted by most authorities.

page 193 note 1 Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 22. 76Google Scholar; Dio, xliv. 11. 4Google Scholar; Suet. Caes. 80. 3.Google Scholar

page 193 note 2 Cic. Phil. ii. 82 ff.Google Scholar; but Suet.'s reference to tribes might equally refer to the comitia tributa, held to elect the curule aediles for 43!

page 193 note 3 Suet. Caes. 80. 4Google Scholar, primum… postquam; cf. Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 81.Google Scholar

page 193 note 4 Suet. Caes. 80. 4Google Scholar; domus publica ib. 46Google Scholar; cf. Weinstock, , 276 ff.Google Scholar

page 193 note 5 Suet. Caes. 80. 4Google Scholar; cf. Flor. ii. 13. 91Google Scholar, Hor. Od. i. 20. 3Google Scholar, Dio, 1. 8. 3Google Scholar, Platner, S. B. and Ashby, T., A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome (Oxford, 1929)Google Scholar, s.v. ‘theatrum Pompei’.

page 194 note 1 Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 84Google Scholar; cf. Willems, P., Le Sénat de la république romaine, ii (Paris, 1885), 132 fGoogle Scholar., 146 f.

page 194 note 2 Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 81, 26. 96Google Scholar; Dio, xliv. 16. 1.Google Scholar

page 194 note 3 Syme, R., The Roman Revolution (Oxford, 1952), 78Google Scholar; Cic. Div. ii. 23.Google Scholar

page 194 note 4 Plut. Brut. 14. 1Google Scholar; Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 81Google Scholar; Dio, xliv. 16. 1.Google Scholar

page 194 note 5 App. Civ. ii. 476.Google Scholar

page 194 note 6 Plut. Brut. 16. 1Google Scholar, Caes. 66. 6Google Scholar; Augustus removed the statue from the curia and placed it opposite the grand door of the theatre; the curia was declared a locus sceleratus and walled up: Suet. Caes. 88Google Scholar, Aug. 31. 5Google Scholar; Dio, xlvii. 19. 1.Google Scholar

page 195 note 1 Civ. ii. 481.Google Scholar

page 195 note 2 Balsdon, J. P. V. D., Life and Leisure in Ancient Rome (London, 1969), 255 f.Google Scholar

page 195 note 3 Cic. Fam. vii. i. 2.Google Scholar

page 195 note 4 Dio, xliv. 16. 1, etc.Google Scholar; Taylor, Lily Ross, Party Politics in the Age of Caesar (Berkeley, 1964), 69Google Scholar, Lintott, A. W., Violence in Ancient Rome (Oxford, 1968), 83 ff.Google Scholar, for the gladiators' role in the street-fighting of the 50s. Lintott observes (p. 84) that Dec.Brutus may have been given these very gladiators by Caesar himself.

page 195 note 5 Vit. Caes. 263. 98.Google Scholar

page 195 note 6 Broughton, , M.R.R. ii. 307Google Scholar; Taylor, , 30f.Google Scholar; Balsdon, , 250.Google Scholar

page 195 note 7 Civ. ii. 495.Google Scholar

page 195 note 8 Dio, xliv. 16. 2Google Scholar. However, the Greek could also mean ‘as though about to fight’—i.e. the same as Appian.

page 195 note 9 Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 26a. 98Google Scholar; cf. Balsdon, , 292Google Scholar, Petronius, 45Google Scholar, for the absurdities of a cut-price fight.

page 196 note 1 Balsdon, , 297.Google Scholar

page 196 note 2 As Levi, (see p. 191 n. 2)Google Scholar, 3 suggests.

page 196 note 3 Weinstock, , 89Google Scholar; Balsdon, , 244 ff.Google Scholar

page 196 note 4 Apart from some wild speculations by Hubaux, J., BAB xliii (1957), 76 ff.Google Scholar

page 196 note 5 F. iii. 541 f.Google Scholar; cf. Call. Aet. fr. 178. 8Google Scholar, Ov. F. ii. 584, iv. 377, 685 ff., etc.Google Scholar

page 196 note 6 Wilkinson, L. P., Ovid Recalled (Cambridge, 1955), 244 ff.Google Scholar

page 196 note 7 F. iii. 539 f.Google Scholar

page 197 note 1 65. 1 f. (tr. B. Perrin, Loeb ed.).

page 197 note 2 Plut. Caes. 67. 1Google Scholar; Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 25. 92Google Scholar; Dio, xliv. 20. 3Google Scholar; App. Civ. ii. 495.Google Scholar

page 197 note 3 Will: Plut. Caes. 68. 1, etc.Google Scholar; Cinna the praetor: Mar. 15 according to Plut. Brut. 18. 4Google Scholar; Mar. 17 according to App. Civ. ii. 527Google Scholar; Cinna the poet: Suet. Caes. 85, etc.Google Scholar

page 197 note 4 Balsdon, , 16 ff.Google Scholar

page 197 note 5 Suet. Caes. 81. 4.Google Scholar

page 197 note 6 Dio, xxxvii. 46. 4Google Scholar; cf. Suet. Claud. 34. 2Google Scholar, Sen. Ep. vii. 3.Google Scholar

page 197 note 7 Dio, xliv. 16. 2Google Scholar; App. Civ. ii. 482Google Scholar; Willems, , ii. 147.Google Scholar

page 198 note 1 Suet. Caes. 81. 3, etc.Google Scholar; Weinstock, , 280, 346.Google Scholar

page 198 note 2 Dio, xliv. 17. 3Google Scholar; cf. Plut. Caes. 63. 6Google Scholar; morning sacrifices: cf. Enn. Sc. 54Google Scholar, Virg. Aen. iii. 176 f.Google Scholar, v. 743 f., etc.; an alternative was to wash thoroughly to purge the evil influences of the night: Pers. ii. 16Google Scholar, Prop. iii. 10. 16Google Scholar, Thphr. Char. 16. 11.Google Scholar

page 198 note 3 Plut. Brut. 16. 1Google Scholar, Caes. 63. 7Google Scholar; Magie, D., de Romanorum vocabulis sollemnibus… in Graecorum sermonem conversis (Leipzig, 1905), 148.Google Scholar

page 198 note 4 Cic. Div. ii. 53, i. 72, i. 119Google Scholar; Val. Max. viii. 11. 2.Google Scholar

page 198 note 5 Plut. Brut. 15. 1Google Scholar; cf. Dio, xliv. 17. 3Google Scholar; contra Cic. Div. i. 28, etc.Google Scholar

page 198 note 6 Suet. Caes. 59. 1, 77Google Scholar; Weinstock, , 27 f.Google Scholar

page 198 note 7 Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 83Google Scholar; Plut. Brut. 16. 1Google Scholar; Suet. Caes. 80. 4.Google Scholar

page 198 note 8 Mommsen, , Staatsrecht, iii. 2. 934 ff.Google Scholar; Willems, , ii. 174.Google Scholar

page 198 note 9 Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 24. 86Google Scholar; Suet. Caes. 80. 4Google Scholar; App. Civ. ii. 488 f.Google Scholar; Flor. iv. 2. 94.Google Scholar

page 198 note 10 Cic. Fam. x. 12. 3Google Scholar; further details Willems, , ii. 173.Google Scholar

page 198 note 11 Suet. Caes. 81. 4Google Scholar; Plut. Caes. 63. 7, etc.Google Scholar

page 198 note 12 Dio, xliv. 18. 1Google Scholar; cf. App. Civ. ii. 482.Google Scholar

page 199 note 1 Dio, xliv. 17. 3Google Scholar; cf. Weinstock, , 272Google Scholar; the chair was granted to Caesar in 44 and was used in the rostra at the Lupercalia.

page 199 note 2 App. Civ. ii. 482Google Scholar; Suet. Caes. 81Google Scholar; cf. Plut. Caes. 64. 3Google Scholar, Dio, xliv. 17. 3Google Scholar, Nic. Dam. Vit. Caes. 23. 84.Google Scholar

page 199 note 3 I am grateful to J. P. V. D. Balsdon, J. North, and A. Drummond for their help with this paper.