Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:19:08.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Augustan World History: The Historiae Philippicae of Pompeius Trogus*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

J. M. Alonso-Núñez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The political unification of the Mediterranean world in the last epoch of the Roman Republic doubtless provided the stimulus for the composition of world histories. One of these is the only universal history written in Latin, under the title Historiae Philippicae, by Pompeius Trogus in the time of Augustus. The original work is lost, but we have an Epitoma produced around the year A.D. 200 by Iustinus. The prologi, which contain summaries of the original work, have been preserved, but there is no indication of authorship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , April 1987 , pp. 56 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Edited by Oldfather, C. H.et alii in The Loeb Classical Library (1933–1967)Google Scholar.

2. Jacoby, F., FGrHist II A 324Google Scholar; C 229.

3. Edited by H. L. Jones in The Loeb Classical Library (1917–1933).

4. Edited by O. Seel in Bibliotheca Teubneriana (1972); edition of the Fragmenta by Seel, O. in Bibliotheca Teubneriana (1956)Google Scholar. For the text and its transmission see Reynolds, L. D., ‘Justinus’, Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford, 1983), pp. 197–9Google Scholar. There is a lexicon by Eichert, O., Vollständiges Wörterbuch zur philippischen Geschichte des Iustinus (Hannover, 1882Google Scholar; reprint Hildesheim, 1967).

5. Edited by K. Zangemeister in Bibliotheca Teubneriana (1889).

6. For the idea of world history in antiquity see Breebaart, A. B., ‘Weltgeschichte als Thema der antiken Geschichtsschreibung’, Acta Historica Neerlandica 1 (1966), 1–21Google Scholar; Budinger, M., Die Universalhistorie im Altertume (Wien, 1895)Google Scholar; Burde, P., Untersuchungen zur antiken Universalgeschichtsschreibung, Diss.-Inaug. Erlangen-Nürnberg, 1972 (München, 1974)Google Scholar; Momigliano, A., ‘The Origins of Universal History’, ASNP, Serie III, vol. XII, 2 (1982), 533–60Google Scholar = Settimo Contributo (Rome, 1984), pp. 77–103Google Scholar; Vittinghoff, F., ‘Christliche und nichtchristliche Anschauungsmodelle’, Mensch und Weltgeschichte: zur Geschichte der Universalgeschichtsschreibung, ed. by Randa, A. (Salzburg, 1969), pp. 19–40Google Scholar.

7. Jacoby, F., FGrHist II B 115Google Scholar.

8. Jacoby, F., FGrHist II A 72Google Scholar.

9. Edited by W. R. Paton in The Loeb Classical Library (1922–1927).

10. For the title of the work see Momigliano, A., ‘La valutazione di Filippo il Macedone in Giustino’, Rendiconti Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, vol. 66, fasc. 11–15, 1933, 983–96Google Scholar = Quarto Contributo (Rome, 1969), pp. 225–38Google Scholar, and more recently Urban, R., ‘Historiae Philippicae bei Pompeius Trogus: Versuch einer Deutung’, Historia 31 (1982), 82–96Google Scholar. On the problems of titles of works see also Horsfall, N., ‘Some problems of titulature in Roman Literary History’, BICS 28 (1981), 103–14, esp. pp. 105–6Google Scholar.

11. Peter, , HRRel I2 (Leipzig, 1914), 55–97Google Scholar.

12. In relation to this problem see Bickerman, E. J., ‘Origines gentium’, CPh 47 (1952, 65–81Google Scholar; see now Cornell, T. J., ‘Gründer’, RAC XII (1983), col. 1107–45Google Scholar.

13. On this point see Bivar, A. D. H., ‘The Azes Era and the Indravarma casket’, South Asian Archaeology 1979, ed. by Härtel, H., 369–76Google Scholar. According to Bivar the Vikrama Era is the same as the Azes Era. The inscription providing a date for the destruction of the Indo-Scythians is on the Indravarna casket. The Azes Era was established to commemorate the victory of the Indo-Scythians over the Indo-Greeks.

14. For this question see Steele, R. B., ‘Pompeius Trogus and Iustinus’, AJPh 38 (1917), 19–41Google Scholar.

15. On this problem see Brunt, P. A., ‘On Historical Fragments and Epitomes’, CQ 30 (1980), 477–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Galdi, M., L'epitome nella letteratura latina (Napoli, 1922), esp. pp. 94–123Google Scholar. Opelt, I., ‘Epitome’, RAC V (1962), col. 944–73 is very usefulGoogle Scholar.

16. For these questions see Ferrero, L., Struttura e metodo dell' Epitome di Giustino (Torino, 1957)Google Scholar, Forni, G., Valore storico e fonte di Pompeo Trogo (Urbino, 1958)Google Scholar, and Forni, G. and Bertinelli, G. Angeli, ‘Pompeo Trogo come fonte di storia’, ANRW II, 30, pp. 1298–362Google Scholar.

17. For this point see Momigliano, A., ‘The Historians of the Classical World and their Audiences: Some Suggestions’, ASNP, Serie III, vol. VIII, 1 (1978), 59–75Google Scholar = Sesto Contributo (Rome, 1980), pp. 361–76Google Scholar.

18. For these aspects see Seel, O., Die Praefatio des Pompeius Trogus (Erlangen, 1955)Google Scholar.

19. For Trogus' historiographic achievement see Seel, O., Eine römische Weltgeschichte: Studien zum Text der Epitome des Iustinus und zur Historik des Pompeius Trogus (Nürnberg, 1972)Google Scholar and Seel, O., ‘Über Pompeius Trogus und das Problem der Universalgeschichte’, ANRW II, 30, pp. 1363–423Google Scholar.

20. For the concept of world-empires consult Alonso-Nńñez, , ‘Die Abfolge der Weltreiche bei Polybios und Dionysios von Halikarnassos’, Historia 32 (1983), 411–26Google Scholar; Alonso-Nńñez, , ‘Die Weltreichssukzession bei Strabo’, Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 36 (1984), 53–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alonso-Nńñez, , ‘Appian and the World Empires’, Athenaeum 62 (1984), 640–4Google Scholar; Drews, R., ‘Assyria in Classical Universal Histories’, Historia 14 (1965), 129–38Google Scholar; Flusser, D., ‘The Four Empires in the Fourth Sibyl and in the Book of Daniel’, Israel Oriental Studies 2 (1972), 148–75Google Scholar; Gatz, B., Weltalter, goldene Zeit und sinnverwandte Vorstellungen (Hildesheim, 1967)Google Scholar; Goez, W., Translatio Imperii (Tübingen, 1958)Google Scholar; Kocken, E. J. J., De theorie van de overdracht der wereldheerschappij tot op Innocentius III (Nijmegen, 1935)Google Scholar; Mendels, D., ‘The Five Empires: a Note on a Propagandistic Topos’, AJPh 102 (1981), 330–7Google Scholar, and Tadmor, H., ‘Addenda’, AJPh 102 (1981), 338–9Google Scholar; Momigliano, A., ‘Daniele e la teoria greca delle successione degli imperi’, RAL 35 (1980), 157–62Google Scholar = Settimo Contributo (Rome, 1984), pp. 297–304Google Scholar; Swain, J., ‘The Theory of Four Monarchies’, CPh 35 (1940), 1–21Google Scholar; Trieber, C., ‘Die Idee der vier Weltreiche’, Hermes 27 (1892), 321–44Google Scholar, and Trompf, G. W., The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought from Antiquity to Reformation (Berkeley, 1979)Google Scholar.

21. For this question see Momigliano, A., ‘Livio, Plutarco e Giustino su virtù e fortuna dei Romani’, Athenaeum 12 (1934), 45–56Google Scholar = Terzo Contributo (Rome, 1966), pp. 499–511Google Scholar.

22. On this theme see Binder, G., Die Aussetzung des Königskindes Kyros und Romulus (Meisenheim am Glan, 1964)Google Scholar. See also the review of this book by Murray, O., CR 17 (1967), 329–32Google Scholar.

23. For the general context see Alonso-Núñez, , ‘L'opposizione contro l'imperialism romano e contro il Principato nella storiografia del tempo di Augusto’, RSA 12 (1982), 131–41Google Scholar.

24. For the relations of Rome with other peoples see Millar, F., The Roman Empire and its Neighbours (London, 1981 2)Google Scholar.

25. For this point see Urban, R., ‘Gallisches Bewusstsein und Romkritik bei Pompeius Trogus’, ANRW II, 30, pp. 1424–3Google Scholar.

26. For this sort of problem see Momigliano, A., Alien Wisdom (Cambridge, 1975), esp. pp. 50–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. For reflections on the character of ancient historiography see Mazzarino, S., Il pensiero storico classico (Bari, 1966), vols. 1–3Google Scholar and the brilliant articles by Momigliano, A., ‘Time in Ancient Historiography’, H & T Beiheft 6 (1966), 1–23Google Scholar = Quarto Contributo (Rome, 1969), pp. 13–41Google Scholar and ‘Tradition and the Classical Historian’, H & T 11 (1972), 279–93Google Scholar = Quinto Contributo (Rome, 1975), pp. 13–31Google Scholar.

28. Syme, R., Tacitus II (Oxford, 1958), pp. 611–24, esp. pp. 622–3Google Scholar, has even suggested that Tacitus was born in Vasio (today Vaison-la-Romaine), where Trogus was born.