Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
THE EVENTS OF 1989 IN EASTERN EUROPE HAVE BEEN INTERPRETED in diverse and often contradictory ways: from the end of history to its rebirth, as both negotiated revolutions and popular uprisings. In many countries a fundamental repositioning of opposition and dissident forces was observed — changing from groups of anti-system activists quite outside the political establishment into major statesmen and national leaders involving, in some cases, rapid transformation into the occupants of major or even prime ministerial roles. Similarly, the former monopolistic ruling parties often found themselves quickly relegated to the margins of political life as oppositions of dubious legitimacy and minuscule political influence. Yet these roles were also subject to rapid reversal and further repositioning in a number of countries. The major difference now was that former governments became formally constituted oppositions rather than political pariahs or enemies of the people. That was a measure of the significance of the change that had been effected.
1 I discuss the nature of democratic consolidation in the region in ‘Patterns of Politics: Central Europe’, in White, , Batt, J.S. and Lewis, P. G. (eds), Developments in Central and East European Politics, London, Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Preface to Dahl, R. A. (ed.), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1966, p. xvi.Google Scholar
3 ibid., pp. xiv–xv.
4 Sartori, G., ‘Opposition and Control: Problems and Prospects’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1966, p. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Dahl, op. cit., p. 372.Google Scholar
6 See Lewis, , ‘Democratization in Eastern Europe’, in Potter, D.P.G. et al. (eds), Democratization, Cambridge, Polity, 1997, p. 416.Google Scholar
7 Lewis, P. G., ‘Political Participation in Post‐communist Democracies’, in Democratization, ibid.Google Scholar
8 Dahl, R. A., ‘Some Explanations’, in op. cit., p. 366.Google Scholar
9 ibid., p. 400.
10 Janos, A. C., ‘Continuity and Change in Eastern Europe: Strategies of Post‐communist Politics’, East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 8, No. I, 1994, p. 4.Google Scholar
11 Lewis, , ‘History, Europe and the Politics of the East’, in White, S., Batt, J. P. G. and Lewis, P. G. (eds), Developments in East European Politics, London, Macmillan, 1993, pp. 265–66.Google Scholar
12 Mason, D. S., ‘Attitudes toward the Market and Political Participation in the Postcommunist States’, Slavic Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 1995, pp. 388, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Gati, C., ‘The Mirage of Democracy’, Transition, Vol. 2, No. 6, 1996, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
14 Lewis, P. G. (ed.), Party Structure and Organization in East‐Central Europe, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1996, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
15 Mair, P., ‘What is Different about Post‐communist Party Systems?’, Stein Rokkan Memorial Lecture, University of Bergen, 1995.Google Scholar
16 Markowski, R. and Toka, G., ‘Left Turn in Poland and Hungary Five Years after the Collapse of Communism’, Sisyphus, Vol. IX, 1993, p. 85.Google Scholar
17 Szakolczai, A. and Fustos, L., ‘Changing Values Leave Ex‐communists Behind’, Transition, Vol. 2, No. 22, 1996, p. 46.Google Scholar
18 See Lewis, , ‘Party Funding in Post‐communist East‐central Europe’, in Burnell, P. P. G. and Ware, A. (eds), Funding Democratization, Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar