Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:38:52.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reforming Belgium’s Federalism: Comparing the Views of MPs and Voters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2015

Min Reuchamps ,
Dave Sinardet ,
Jérémy Dodeigne  and
Didier Caluwaerts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consociational theory posits that political elites in divided societies will show a stronger ‘spirit of accommodation’ than the groups they represent, and that this prudent leadership on behalf of the elites explains why divided societies hold together. Belgium has long been considered to be one of the best examples of such a consociational democracy. Yet in this country the spirit of accommodation of prudent leaders was questioned and discussed publicly during the 2010–11 political gridlock. The question is therefore whether Belgian political elites are indeed less radical and hold less extreme views than voters, as suggested by consociational theory. To explore this question, this article relies on survey data gathered during the historically long government negotiations of 2010–11 between members of all six Belgian assemblies. This original data set on MPs is compared with data on voters gathered in 2009 and 2014 in order to contrast their views on the reform of Belgium’s federalism. The results show that voters are less radical than MPs on this question, but the data also reveal that MPs are strongly divided within communities and also within party. Neither communities nor parties are monolithic blocks.

Keywords

federalismBelgiumidentitiesMPsvoterspolitical parties
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 460 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Min Reuchamps is Professor of Political Science at the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL). Contact email: [email protected].

Dave Sinardet is Professor of Political Science at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Contact email: [email protected].

Jérémy Dodeigne is Post-doctoral Researcher at the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) and part-time Lecturer at the Université de Liège (ULg). Contact email: [email protected].

Didier Caluwaerts is Professor of Political Science at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Contact email: [email protected].

References

REFERENCES

Baudewyns, P. (2014), Être électeur en Wallonie: Le comportement électoral des Wallons lors des élections législatives de 2007 et de 2010 (Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain).Google Scholar
Bogaards, M. (1998), ‘The Favourable Factors for Consociational Democracy: A Review’, European Journal of Political Research, 33: 475–496.Google Scholar
Brancati, D. (2006), ‘Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?’, International Organization, 60: 651–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, D. (2007), ‘The Origins and Strengths of Regional Parties’, British Journal of Political Science, 38: 135–159.Google Scholar
Burgess, M. and Pinder, J. (2007), Multinational Federations (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caluwaerts, D. and Reuchamps, M. (2015), ‘Combining Federalism with Consociationalism: Is Belgian Consociational Federalism Digging its Own Grave?’, Ethnopolitics, 14: 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, K. (2012), The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society (London: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Deschouwer, K. (2013), ‘Party Strategies, Voter Demands and Territorial Reform in Belgium’, West European Politics, 36: 338–358.Google Scholar
Deschouwer, K. and Reuchamps, M. (2013), ‘The Belgian Federation at a Crossroad’, Regional and Federal Studies, 23: 261–270.Google Scholar
Devos, C. and Sinardet, D. (2012), ‘Governing without a Government: The Belgian Experiment’, Governance, 25: 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodeigne, J., Gramme, P., Reuchamps, M. and Sinardet, D. (2015), ‘Beyond Linguistic and Party Homogeneity: Determinants of Belgian MPs’ Preferences on Federalism and State Reform’, Party Politics, published early online, September, doi: 10.1177/1354068814550429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, D.J. (1985), ‘Federalism and Consociational Regimes’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 15: 7–34.Google Scholar
Erk, J. (2003), ‘“Wat We Zelf Doen, Doen We Beter”: Belgian Substate Nationalisms, Congruence and Public Policy’, Journal of Public Policy, 23: 201–224.Google Scholar
Erk, J. (2008), Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany and Switzerland (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Horowitz, D.L. (1985), Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Huyse, L. (1981), ‘Political Conflict in Bicultural Belgium’, in A. Lijphart (ed.), Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium: The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California): 107–126.Google Scholar
Jeffery, C. and Schakel, A.H. (2012), ‘Editorial: Towards a Regional Political Science’, Regional Studies, 47: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1979), ‘Religious vs. Linguistic vs. Class Voting: The “Crucial Experiment” of Comparing Belgium, Canada, South Africa, and Switzerland’, American Political Science Review, 73: 442–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1981), ‘Introduction: The Belgian Example of Cultural Coexistence in Comparative Perspective’, in A. Lijphart (ed.), Conflict and Coexistence in Belgium: The Dynamics of a Culturally Divided Society (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California): 1–12.Google Scholar
Livingston, W.S. (1952), ‘A Note on the Nature of Federalism’, Political Science Quarterly, 67: 81–95.Google Scholar
Luther, K.R. (1999), ‘A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Political Parties and Party Systems in Consociational Democracy’, in K. Deschouwer and K.R. Luther (eds), Party Elites in Divided Societies: Political Parties in Consociational Democracy (London: Routledge): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massetti, E. and Schakel, A.H. (2013), ‘Ideology Matters: Why Decentralisation Has a Differentiated Effect on Regionalist Parties’ Fortunes in Western Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 52: 797–821.Google Scholar
Massetti, E. and Toubeau, S. (2013), ‘Sailing with Northern Winds: Party Politics and Federal Reforms in Italy’, West European Politics, 36: 359–381.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, M. (2009), ‘The Saliency of Regionalization in Party Systems’, Party Politics, 15: 199–218.Google Scholar
Meguid, B. (2008), Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Michels, R. (1971), Les partis politiques: Essai sur les tendances oligarchiques des démocraties (Paris: Flamarion).Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. (1998), ‘The Evolution of Devolution: Labour’s Home Rule Strategy in Opposition’, Government and Opposition, 33: 479–496.Google Scholar
Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (1999), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. (2003), ‘Decentralization as an Electoral Strategy’, Comparative Political Studies, 36: 1068–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuchamps, M. (2013), ‘The Future of Belgian Federalism Through the Eyes of the Citizens’, Regional and Federal Studies, 23: 353–368.Google Scholar
Reuchamps, M. (ed.) (2015), Minority Nations in Multinational Federations: A Comparative Study of Quebec and Wallonia (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
Sinardet, D. (2010), ‘From Consociational Consciousness to Majoritarian Myth: Consociational Democracy, Multi-level Politics and the Belgian Case of Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde’, Acta Politica, 45: 346–369.Google Scholar
Sinardet, D. (2012), ‘Federal Reform and Party Politics: The Case of the Fifth Belgian State Reform’, in A. Benz and F. Knuepling (eds), Changing Federal Constitutions: Lessons from International Comparison (Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers): 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. (1995), Federalism: The Multiethnic Challenge (London: Longman).Google Scholar
Sorens, J. (2009), ‘The Partisan Logic of Decentralization in Europe’, Regional and Federal Studies, 19: 255–272.Google Scholar
Swenden, W. (2002), ‘Asymmetric Federalism and Coalition-making in Belgium’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32: 67–87.Google Scholar
Swenden, W. and Jans, M.T. (2006), ‘“Will it Stay or Will it Go?” Federalism and the Sustainability of Belgium’, West European Politics, 29: 877–894.Google Scholar
Tierney, S. (2009), ‘Federalism in a Unitary State: A Paradox too Far?’, Regional and Federal Studies, 19: 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toubeau, S. and Massetti, E. (2013), ‘The Party Politics of Territorial Reforms in Europe’, West European Politics, 36: 297–316.Google Scholar
Toubeau, S. and Wagner, M. (2015), ‘Explaining Party Positions on Decentralization’, British Journal of Political Science, 45: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed