Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T12:53:27.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reading Notes, Winter 1995

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Ghiţa Ionescu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1995 , pp. 101 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 But in the next issue the correspondence pages were deluged with unanimously angry letters of protest.

2 Paris, 1815.

3 Peter Hennessy, in an article ‘by invitation’ in The Economist of 24 December 1994 tries to prove, against Bagehot, how influential the modern British monarchs have been when it comes to calling elections and appointing prime ministers.

4 London, Heinemann, 1993.

5 London, Jonathan Cape, 1993.