Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:01:08.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Competition in the 2013 Italian Elections: Evidence from an Expert Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Aldo Di Virgilio ,
Daniela Giannetti ,
Andrea Pedrazzani  and
Luca Pinto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we examine the structure of party competition in Italy in the February 2013 elections. We rely on the spatial approach to party competition to analyse the most salient dimensions of the policy space in the Italian context. Our analysis is based on quantitative estimates from expert survey data. These data highlight the salience of the socioeconomic policy dimension and capture the change in the importance of the EU dimension. Finally, this study provides an analysis of potential coalition governments in the aftermath of the 2013 general election that is grounded on the spatial approach to coalition formation.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 50 , Supplement 1 , January 2015 , pp. 65 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Aldo Di Virgilio is an Associate Professor in Political Science in the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the University of Bologna. Contact email: [email protected].

Daniela Giannetti is Professor in Political Science in the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the University of Bologna. Contact email: [email protected].

Andrea Pedrazzani is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the University of Bologna. Contact email: [email protected].

Luca Pinto is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the University of Bologna. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Bellucci, P., Sanders, D. and Serricchio, F. (2012), ‘Explaining European Identity’, in P. Bellucci, D. Sanders, G. Toka and M. Torcal (eds), The Europeanization of National Politics? Citizenship and Support in a Post-Enlargement Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 61–90.Google Scholar
Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Budge, I., Robertson, D. and Hearl, D. (1987) (eds), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. A Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001) (eds), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Curini, L. (2011), ‘Government Survival the Italian Way: The Core and the Advantages of Policy Immobilism during the First Republic’, European Journal of Political Research, 50(1): 110–142.Google Scholar
Curini, L. and Iacus, S. (2008), ‘Italian Spatial Competition between 2006 and 2008: A Changing Party System?’, paper presented at the XXII Congress of the Italian Political Science Society (SISP), Pavia, 5–8 September.Google Scholar
Curini, L. and Pinto, L. (2013), ‘Government Formation under the Shadow of a Core Party: The Case of the First Italian Republic’, Party Politics, 19(3): 502–522.Google Scholar
Debus, M. (2008), ‘Office and Policy Payoffs in Coalition Governments’, Party Politics, 14(5): 515–538.Google Scholar
Debus, M. (2009), ‘Pre-Electoral Commitments and Government Formation’, Public Choice, 138(1): 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehousse, R. (2013), ‘Negative Europeanisation: European Issues in the Italian Elections’, Contemporary Italian Politcs, 5(2): 166–178.Google Scholar
Di Virgilio, A. and Giannetti, D. (2014), ‘The General Election in Italy, February 2013’, Electoral Studies, 34(2): 369–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Virgilio, A. and Radaelli, C.M. (2013) (eds), Italian Politics: Technocrats in Office (New York: Berghahn Books).Google Scholar
Gabel, M. (1998), Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion and European Union (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, M. and Huber, J. (2000), ‘Putting Parties in their Place: Inferring Party Left–Right Ideological Positions from Manifestos Data’, American Journal of Political Science, 44(1): 94–103.Google Scholar
Giannetti, D. and Benoit, K. (2009) (eds), Intra-party Politics and Coalition Governments (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Giannetti, D. and Sened, I. (2004), ‘Party Competition and Coalition Formation: Italy 1994–1996’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(4): 483–515.Google Scholar
Golder, S.N. (2006), The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005), ‘Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 6(4): 419–443.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2002), ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 965–989.Google Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. (2006) (eds), Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Laver, M. (2001) (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Laver, M. and Hunt, W.B. (1992), Policy and Party Competition (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990), Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1996), Making and Breaking Governments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiserson, M. (1966), ‘Coalitions in Politics: A Theoretical and Empirical Study’, unpublished PhD thesis (New Haven, CT: Yale University).Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2001), ‘Searching for the Positions of Political Actors: A Review of Approaches and a Critical Evaluation of Expert Surveys’, in M. Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors (London: Routledge): 10–30.Google Scholar
Martin, L.W. and Stevenson, R.T. (2001), ‘Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 45(1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M.D. and Mendes, S.M. (2001), ‘The Policy Space of Party Manifestos’, in M. Laver (ed.), Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors (London: Routledge): 90–114.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944), Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Pedrazzani, A. and Pinto, L. (2013), ‘Gli elettori del Movimento 5 stelle’, in P. Corbetta and E. Gualmini (eds), Il partito di Grillo (Bologna: il Mulino): 89–122.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1962), The Theory of Political Coalitions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1982), Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice (San Francisco: Freeman).Google Scholar
Schofield, N. (1993), ‘Political Competition and Multiparty Coalition Governments’, European Journal of Political Research, 23(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Schofield, N. (1995), ‘Coalition Politics: A Formal Model and Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7(3): 245–281.Google Scholar
Schofield, N. (1996), ‘The Heart of a Polity’, in N. Schofield (ed.), Collective Decision-making: Social Choice and Political Economy (Boston, MA: Kluwer): 183–220.Google Scholar
Strøm, K., Budge, I. and Laver, M.J. (1994), ‘Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 38(2): 303–335.Google Scholar
de Swaan, A. (1973), Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formation (Amsterdam: Elsevier).Google Scholar
Volkens, A., Bara, J., Best, R.E. and Budge, I. (2013) (eds), Mapping Policy Preferences III: Measurement Solutions for Manifesto Analyses: 54 Democracies, 1945–2012 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Di Virgilio Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Di Virgilio Supplementary Material(File)
File 30.7 KB